Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
Are you intentionally ignoring the connection between banning AP ammunition and starting a study to determine what "AP" ammunition is?

Right now, yes. Later on, no.

Because there has to be a seperate bill to ban them.

108 posted on 02/27/2004 8:30:35 AM PST by Dan from Michigan ("You know it don't come easy, the road of the gypsy" - Iron Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: Dan from Michigan
Right now, yes. Later on, no. Because there has to be a seperate bill to ban them.

No. That is exactly wrong. The law is being made now to ban "armor piercing" ammo. The study creates new parameters to define ammo as "armor piercing." No new law is then necessary to ban additional types of ammunition. A bureaucrat simply adds new types of ammunition to the list of banned "armor piercing" ammo as defined by Congressional study and that's it.

Who will even say how heavy the body-armor used in the study has to be? No one will vote on a law about that.

110 posted on 02/27/2004 8:40:14 AM PST by TigersEye (Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson