Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan from Michigan
Right now, yes. Later on, no. Because there has to be a seperate bill to ban them.

No. That is exactly wrong. The law is being made now to ban "armor piercing" ammo. The study creates new parameters to define ammo as "armor piercing." No new law is then necessary to ban additional types of ammunition. A bureaucrat simply adds new types of ammunition to the list of banned "armor piercing" ammo as defined by Congressional study and that's it.

Who will even say how heavy the body-armor used in the study has to be? No one will vote on a law about that.

110 posted on 02/27/2004 8:40:14 AM PST by TigersEye (Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
Who will even say how heavy the body-armor used in the study has to be?

I think that one's a no-brainer. They'll spec it for the body armor commonly used by LEOs, i.e., soft armor, designed to stop most pistol bullets.

IOW, all centerfire rifle ammunition will be prohibited. The USA will become a shotgun-only zone for big game hunting. That ought to scare the crap out of the complancent "they'll never come for my deer rifle" folks. No, they're not coming for your rifles, they're coming for your ammunition.

Good luck filling the freezer with venison when you're only allowed to load blanks into your Winchester.

162 posted on 02/27/2004 2:29:50 PM PST by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson