To: Indy Pendance
.
To: Indy Pendance
The US Constitution is a document in place to place limits on government. Would banning gay marriage limit government or restrict freedoms on the citizenry?
3 posted on
02/26/2004 9:59:21 PM PST by
xrp
To: Indy Pendance
To: Indy Pendance
"By circumventing the legislative process, overriding long-standing majority opinion and excluding the people from so fundamental a decision as marriage, these judges threaten our democracy and the rule of law."
I think we must first protect marriage with the constitutional amendment and then do something about the judges - they have entirely too much influence without enough "checks".
Great article!
To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda ping. Let me know if you want on or off this very busy ping list!
11 posted on
02/26/2004 11:50:08 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
To: Indy Pendance
If the options are to allow a few activist judges to redefine marriage by judicial fiat, or amend the Constitution to reflect the settled will of the people, the conservative choice is clear. Amen, brother!
12 posted on
02/26/2004 11:55:57 PM PST by
SuziQ
To: Indy Pendance
16 posted on
02/27/2004 8:00:32 AM PST by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: Indy Pendance
There is a crisis in the Juducial branch today, and we must rise to challenge this before much more damage is done. Besides the threat of Islamic terror, this needs to be the issue of the day.
17 posted on
02/27/2004 8:06:07 AM PST by
ilgipper
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
