Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PBS/FRONTLINE: Invasion of Iraq
PBS/FRONTLINE ^ | 02/26/04 9pm | PBS/FRONTLINE

Posted on 02/26/2004 8:25:37 AM PST by FilmCutter

THE INVASION OF IRAQ

PBS Airdate: Thursday, February 26, at 9 P.M. (check local listings)

As the first anniversary of the war in Iraq approaches, FRONTLINE® presents a special two-hour documentary investigation recounting the key strategies, battles, and turning points of the war from both sides of the battlefield.

In “The Invasion of Iraq,” airing Thursday, February 26, at 9 P.M. on PBS (check local listings), FRONTLINE takes viewers behind the scenes of the allied invasion and advance on Baghdad. Through first-hand accounts from key commanders, frontline soldiers, and civilians on both sides of the conflict, the documentary offers a rare battlefield perspective of the war as seen through the eyes of those who lived it.

“To date, most attempts to understand the war have focused on pre-war intelligence and the political process that led to war,” producer Richard Sanders says. “‘The Invasion of Iraq’ takes a different route, chronicling the experiences of the troops on the front line. It also shows how the false assessment of Saddam Hussein’s alleged weapons of mass destruction was just the first in a series of intelligence failures that shaped the course of the war and the unstable occupation America is now mired in.”

In an exclusive, wide-ranging interview, Republican Guard General Raad Al-Hamdani—who turned himself in to the U.S. military but is now free to speak—offers accounts of key Iraqi strategy meetings that paint a portrait of Saddam as a confused leader who misjudged America’s military strategy. For example, as the main elements of U.S. forces approached Baghdad, Al-Hamdani says he was shocked to receive a new message from Saddam Hussein.

“The new message was, all that happened in the last two weeks was a strategic deception,” Al-Hamdani recalls being told. “The main enemy will come from north of Baghdad. Therefore, we should minimize the troops south of Baghdad.” But in reality, there were only a handful of U.S. troops north of Baghdad and a week later the capital fell—conquered by troops from the south.

U.S. commanders, meanwhile, reveal that much of the intelligence they received prior to the war regarding how the Iraqi people would react once the invasion began was shockingly inaccurate.

“We thought once we had crossed the Euphrates River, that might be the trigger for Shia resistance or Shia opposition to the regime to take overt forms,” says Allied Ground Command Lt. General David McKiernon. “Well, it didn’t happen.”

U.S. soldiers also recall learning the hard way that intelligence reports about the level of enemy resistance were often incorrect. “It was useless,” says Lieutenant Jason King of the 5th Army’s 11th Aviation Regiment. “It really was useless. There was definitely something wrong with the intelligence flow.”

“The Invasion of Iraq” offers eyewitness accounts of some of the fiercest, bloodiest fighting to occur during the allied assault. The 11th Aviation Regiment’s Captain Andrew Tapscott, for example, says his fears of accidentally firing upon innocent civilians lost out to the instinct for self-preservation when his unit came under a blistering attack.

“Fire was coming from the houses, the waterways, trees, shrubs, vehicles,” he says. “It became fairly evident that in order to survive you were going to have to return fire. I was on the radio when I got hit—I was pretty sure I was done for.”

When the Iraqi people failed to rise up and rally to the allied cause, insiders say, some U.S. military leaders began to doubt whether there were sufficient troops to continue the attack on Baghdad.

“I wasn’t real comfortable with the troop levels,” admits Lt. General William Wallace, commander of the V Corps. “I wanted to make damn sure that when we did it we were gonna be decisive and successful.”

General McKiernon, however, disagreed. “I said that we’re going to have to accept some risk, and I want you to continue your attack rapidly to the north. Fast is better than slower. Fast is more lethal than slower. Fast is more final.”

Ultimately, the film reveals, Iraqi resistance crumbled under the allied onslaught, as many Iraqi soldiers simply put down their guns, abandoned their tanks, and went home.

“I don’t have the exact figures, but I don’t think more than 15 percent of the [Iraqi] armed forces actually fought,” General Al-Hamdani tells FRONTLINE.

Iraqi Lt. Colonel Mahmood Sharhan Mohamed agrees. “There was a tank commander in our brigade [who] told the president he wanted to change the name of his unit to the Al Samood—the unit which struggles,” Mohamed says. “In the end, he didn’t fire a single shot at the Americans and all his tanks were captured.”

The swift and sudden end of major hostilities didn’t make the allies’ job much easier, however. Once again, officials say, U.S. planning for what would happen after the war didn’t match up to the actual situation in which American soldiers and military commanders found themselves.

“We expected there to be some degree of infrastructure left in [Baghdad] in terms of intellectual infrastructure, in terms of running the government,” Lt. General Wallace says. “What in fact happened is that when you decapitated the regime, everything below it fell apart.”

General McKiernan agrees. “You had no Iraq institutions to co-op,” he says. “No Iraqi army, no Iraqi police, the prisoners let out of prison. No local or national governmental organization. Ministries didn’t exist. “A vacuum was created,” McKiernan says. “And into this vacuum flowed first chaos and then a violent insurgency.”

The program also dissects a bitter backstage bureaucratic battle between Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and the leadership of the Army—its chief of staff General Eric Shinseki and the Secretary of the Army Thomas White. Before the invasion, White and Shinseki had argued it would take about 400,000 ground troops to control the potential chaos after the Iraqi regime fell.

“We were very concerned that there wouldn’t be sufficient boots on the ground after the operation to provide for security,” says White. But Rumsfeld and his deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, moved forcefully to dismiss the Army’s concerns, calling their projections “wildly off the mark.” They believed the post-war situation would not require more than the 200,000 troops they had committed to the invasion.

“Our view was that they were going to be terribly wrong,” says White. “And their response, publicly and privately, was basically that Shinseki and I didn’t know what we were talking about.”

But after the fall of Baghdad, the failure of U.S. troops to control the massive looting and prevent the violent insurgency against the U.S. occupation seemed to bear out the Army’s pre-war assessment that they would not have enough troops.

“Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz and Secretary Rumsfeld…Neither man is a man that I would say was burdened by a great deal of self doubt,” concludes White. “It is hard to believe that rational people looking at that situation before the combat operation could have thought it was going to come out in any other way than it in fact did.”

“The Invasion of Iraq” is a Mentorn production for WGBH/FRONTLINE and Channel 4. The producers are Richard Sanders and Jeff Goldberg. The executive producer for Mentorn is Eamonn Matthews. The executive producer for special projects for FRONTLINE is Michael Sullivan.

FRONTLINE is produced by WGBH Boston and is broadcast nationwide on PBS. Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers. Additional support is provided by U.S. News & World Report. FRONTLINE is closed-captioned for deaf and hard-of-hearing viewers.FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation. The executive producer for FRONTLINE is David Fanning.

FRONTLINE XXII/February 2004


TOPICS: Announcements; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: documentary; frontline; invasionofiraq; iraq; iraqifreedom; pbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Press release for my latest editing effort. I hope you all can watch. Some good battle scenes and wonderful Rumsfeld moments.

I hope you all get a chance to watch tonight at 9pm on PBS (check local listings)

1 posted on 02/26/2004 8:25:38 AM PST by FilmCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
Re: As the first anniversary of the war in Iraq approaches

I like the sound of that.

2 posted on 02/26/2004 8:26:43 AM PST by ChadGore ("Maybe they thought Saddam would lose the next Iraqi election")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
"Occupation we are mired in"..is that like quag"mired" in?I would love the progtam if they have the good things spotlighted and not the just the "mired".
3 posted on 02/26/2004 8:32:36 AM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
Thanks for the notice, but watching Frontline is never an easy proposition.
4 posted on 02/26/2004 8:33:27 AM PST by Naspino (HTTP://NASPINO.BLOGSPOT.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
Thanks for the heads up
5 posted on 02/26/2004 8:42:08 AM PST by UB355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
PBS 8 Feb 26 09:00pm  Add to My Calendar
Series/Documentary, 120 Mins.

"The Invasion of Iraq", Episode #2209.
An investigation recounts strategies, battles and turning points of the war in Iraq.

Original Airdate: February 26, 2004.


Future Airings:
Frontline, KAET Feb 27 12:00am
Frontline, KAET Mar 04 09:00pm
Frontline, KAET Mar 05 12:00am

6 posted on 02/26/2004 8:52:49 AM PST by wolficatZ (___><))))*>____)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Just be thankful you're not in Germany to watch this program.
http://www.journalism.co.uk/news/story823.shtml

"German broadcaster NDR will air a TV documentary this Thursday that investigates two video clips of US military action in Iraq that have been widely circulated on the web.

Both clips show US soldiers shooting apparently unarmed and injured Iraqis. According to military and legal experts interviewed by the Panorama programme, they show US troops breaking international law by shooting unarmed people.

As reported by this site on 14 January, a video of footage from a US Apache helicopter had been widely circulated on the web following its broadcast on ABC News. Aerial footage shows Iraqis apparently abandoning something - which soldiers assumed to be a weapon - and running for cover.

Soldiers receive instructions to 'shoot it' and kill all three men, including one wounded person already lying on the ground.

A second incident was recorded in April 2003 by a CNN crew and broadcast in October that year. Soldiers are seen shooting unarmed and seriously injured Iraqis during a search of an industrial area. Immediately after the shooting, one soldier describes the situation as 'awesome' and says he 'wants to do it all over again'.

During the Panorama documentary, US Viet Nam veteran General Robert G Gard, describes both events as 'inexcusable murders'. Professor Stefan Oeter, an expert in international law, confirms that the shooting of a wounded person is a war crime.

Panorama producer Volker Steinhoff began investigating the two stories after an email tip from a colleague.

"Without the internet, I might not have done the story since watching the video is the central argument for the story."

Mr Steinhoff told dotJournalism he was surprised that neither story had been pursued by the mainstream media.

"It's my impression that CNN and ABC deliberately hid the story - ABC never mentioned the crucial point. The US mainstream media have been extremely unco-operative.

"This issue of shooting wounded people - a possible war crime - hasn't had enough public attention either in Germany or the US."

The programme will be broadcast on German channel ARD at 20.15, central European time, on 26 February.

The full transcript of the Panorama documentary will be available online from noon on 27 February and the two video files will be on the ARD site for Friday only, subject to final permission from CNN.

The US Ministry of Defence has refused to comment on the Panorama investigation."
7 posted on 02/26/2004 9:01:17 AM PST by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
Thanks for the heads-up!
8 posted on 02/26/2004 9:05:16 AM PST by Molly Pitcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Naspino; FilmCutter
Frontline did a magnificent job with "The Farmer's Wife."

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/farmerswife/

I need to get that on tape.
9 posted on 02/26/2004 9:09:17 AM PST by TSgt (I am proudly featured on U.S. Rep Rob Portman's homepage: http://www.house.gov/portman/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
... to control the massive looting ...

Eyewitness accounts tell a different story - only the media tells of "massive looting" - in actuality, according to observers other than media, there was less looting than in Los Angeles during their famous riots!

PBS is run by Liberal Socialist Pondscum (LSP), and it is necessary to put anything seen or heard on any PBS station through a very stringent LSP filter......

10 posted on 02/26/2004 9:12:14 AM PST by mil-vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
I'll watch this for the war footage and interviews with combatants, not the political insights of Messrs. Goldberg and Sanders.
11 posted on 02/26/2004 9:30:54 AM PST by BushMeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saquin
Right the helicopter should have taken them prisoner - oh wait - can't. Well then they should just let them live to kill us another day. I don't think the same rules that apply to uniformed soldiers in military combat can be used against suicidal terrorists. And....
I really don't want any lectures on human rights from Germany. Not at least until they can go a century w/o A) starting a world war and b) committing genocide.
12 posted on 02/26/2004 10:10:38 AM PST by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
Airing now in Dallas
13 posted on 02/26/2004 5:59:03 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bump for Filmcutters latest work
14 posted on 02/26/2004 6:00:49 PM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
Logging off to watch.........yea, I know. It's PBS.

Bttt

15 posted on 02/26/2004 6:03:21 PM PST by DoctorMichael (Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
Yep, I guess we lost that war. Those Iraqis were too clever for us, our armed forces weren't ready, our political leadership didn't know what it was talking about, we didn't have enough troops on the ground, we should have listened to Shinseki, blah, blah, blah.... This is an election year, and the Democrats want back in power. Don't expect objective reporting from PBS.
16 posted on 02/26/2004 6:49:40 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
Yep, another PBS hit piece on Bush. Predictable.
17 posted on 02/26/2004 7:57:30 PM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2
This is an election year, and the Democrats want back in power. Don't expect objective reporting from PBS.

I didn't expect it and I didn't get it. Its an absolute BARF piece, consumed more with the lives of Iraqis too stupid to get out of the way of an American advance than the American's themselves.

18 posted on 02/26/2004 7:58:17 PM PST by Naspino (HTTP://NASPINO.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
Don't watch PBS.
19 posted on 02/26/2004 8:01:01 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FilmCutter
Sorry but I saw this Frontline and it was absolutely horrid & biased - basically a condensed version of "everything that went wrong in the war" with Tom Ricks and other of the biggest fools in the Pentagon correspondents pool.
20 posted on 02/26/2004 8:44:30 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson