Skip to comments.
New Film May Harm Gibson's Career [H'wood Bigs vow revenge]
NY Times ^
| 2/26/2004
| SHARON WAXMAN
Posted on 02/25/2004 3:29:59 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
New Film May Harm Gibson's Career
By SHARON WAXMAN
![](http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/misc/spacer.gif)
LOS ANGELES, Feb. 25 Mel Gibson's provocative new film, "The Passion of the Christ," is making some of Hollywood's most prominent executives uncomfortable in ways that may damage Mr. Gibson's career.
Hollywood is a close-knit world, and friendships and social contact are critical in the making of deals and the casting of movies. Many of Hollywood's most prominent figures are also Jewish. So with a furor arising around the film, along with Mr. Gibson's reluctance to distance himself from his father, who calls the Holocaust mostly fiction, it is no surprise that Hollywood Jewish and non-Jewish has been talking about little else, at least when it's not talking about the Oscars.
Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen, the principals of DreamWorks, have privately expressed anger over the film, said an executive close to the two men.
The chairmen of two other major studios said they would avoid working with Mr. Gibson because of "The Passion of the Christ" and the star's remarks surrounding its release.
Neither of the chairmen would speak for attribution, but as one explained: "It doesn't matter what I say. It'll matter what I do. I will do something. I won't hire him. I won't support anything he's part of. Personally that's all I can do."
The chairman said he was angry not just because of what he had read about the film and its portrayal of Jews in relation to the death of Jesus, but because of Mr. Gibson's remarks defending his father, Hutton Gibson. Last week in a radio interview the elder Mr. Gibson repeated his contention that the Holocaust was "all maybe not all fiction but most of it is." Asked about his father's Holocaust denial in an interview with Diane Sawyer on ABC, the movie star told her to "leave it alone."
The other studio chairman, whose family fled European anti-Semitism before the Holocaust, was less emphatic but said, "I think I can live without him." But others said there would be no lasting backlash against Mel Gibson. "If the movie works, I don't think it will hurt him," said John Lesher, an agent with Endeavor. "People here will work with the anti-Christ if he'll put butts in seats." Mr. Lesher added, "He put his own money where his mouth is. He invested in himself."
As Mr. Lesher implied, Hollywood is also a place of businesspeople, and Mr. Gibson is a proven movie star, popular with audiences. There are few actors with that kind of bankability, no matter their personal views. Mr. Gibson is also a capable director. So some of the initial reactions to his film may fade over time.
Mr. Gibson not only directed and helped write the $30 million film, but he also paid for it, including production and marketing costs, out of his own pocket, which Hollywood has filled.
As an actor and successful director, from "Mad Max" (1979) through "Lethal Weapon" (1987) and its sequels to the Oscar-winning "Braveheart" (1995), Mr. Gibson has long been a Hollywood pet. But he has also been known as a prankster and a self-confessed abuser of various substances. Many in the relentlessly secular movie industry see his recent religious conversion he practices a traditionalist version of Roman Catholicism as another form of addiction.
Last Friday the media billionaire Haim Saban, former owner of the Fox Family Channel, sent a concerned e-mail message to friends about Mr. Gibson and his father.
The message forwarded an article by the journalist Mitch Albom calling on Mr. Gibson to repudiate his father's denial of the Holocaust. Mr. Saban sent the article to, among others, Roger Ailes, who heads Fox News; Norman Pattiz, who runs the Westwood One radio network; and Michael R. Milken, the securities felon turned philanthropist.
Amid the daily dealings of Hollywood, the film and the star have been fodder for unfavorable gossip. Dustin Hoffman has talked to friends about what he called Mr. Gibson's "strangeness" during the ABC interview. The producer Mike Medavoy said Mr. Gibson's religious zealotry made him feel uncomfortable. Mr. Hoffman is Jewish; Mr. Medavoy is the child of Holocaust survivors.
"One question is, `What propelled him to make the movie about the passion of Christ?' " Mr. Medavoy said. "It makes me a little squeamish. What makes me squeamish about religion in general is that people think they have the answer: `I think my God is the right God.' How do you argue against that?"
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: censorship; christ; gibson; hollywood; mediabias; mel; passion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-279 next last
To: dansangel
I haven't seen the film yet, but what do you think the odds are of The Passion receiving Oscar nominations next year?
41
posted on
02/25/2004 3:48:47 PM PST
by
Weimdog
To: Rutles4Ever; cmsgop
God willing, Mel will one day be in Lucas's financial bracket.
But Lucas counts his cash in the billions; Mel's still stuck in the paltry millions.
42
posted on
02/25/2004 3:49:39 PM PST
by
Dr. Eckleburg
(There are very few shades of gray.)
To: SauronOfMordor
Sounds a lot like black-listing. Didn't that used to be a nasty word in Hollywood?
To: cmsgop
I thought Braveheart and Signs were phenomenal enough to put him in their category....this one puts him beyond their reach.
To: SauronOfMordor
Mr. Gibson not only directed and helped write the $30 million film, but he also paid for it, including production and marketing costs, out of his own pocket A guy who can make and pay for his own successful films isn't dependent on other for his career. The Passion would not be in the theaters today if he depended on others in the business.
45
posted on
02/25/2004 3:50:48 PM PST
by
thackney
(Life is Fragile, Handle with Prayer)
To: SauronOfMordor
I don't think he'll be too concerned about it...we'll see more of Mel than any other actor/producer/director currently working.
To: Weimdog
I will totally withdraw from the human race if James Caviezel is not nominated for Best Actor.
47
posted on
02/25/2004 3:51:21 PM PST
by
dansangel
(*PROUD to be a knuckle-dragging, toothless, inbred, right-wing, Southern, gun-toting Neanderthal *)
To: SauronOfMordor
Hollywood wouldn't back him when he needed their help. He sure as hell doesn't need their help now.
48
posted on
02/25/2004 3:51:29 PM PST
by
dc-zoo
To: MJY1288
I am going to see if I can get tickets now I'm going to give $2.50 to my stewardess friends this afternoon to get me a DVD copy in Hong Kong or Eastern Europe!
49
posted on
02/25/2004 3:51:42 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: Rome2000
I don't think what he offered was a defense of his father, but an admonishment to Diane Sawyer that she shouldn't tread onto the turf of a father and son. Let's be honest. The left wants the son to denounce his father. No good son would ever do that.
50
posted on
02/25/2004 3:51:53 PM PST
by
Trust but Verify
(Charter member Broken Glass Republicans (2000))
To: SauronOfMordor
LOL! Hollywood isn't going to believe the backlash they're going to get from their persecution of Mel Gibson.
To: SauronOfMordor
Hollywood can tell little guys "you will never work in this town again!" Thay can't tell that to a guy that not only acts, but writes his own movies, directs them and finances them.
By the way, most of the movies I have really enjoyed never received an oscar.
52
posted on
02/25/2004 3:52:18 PM PST
by
passionfruit
(passionate about my politics, and from the land of fruits and nuts)
To: SauronOfMordor
You mean they plan to blacklist him? What a bunch of McCarthyites.
53
posted on
02/25/2004 3:52:23 PM PST
by
King Black Robe
(With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
To: fish hawk
Pontius Pilate: So, youw fawtha was a Woman. Who was he?
Brian: He was a Centurion, in the Jeruselem Garrison.
Pontius Pilate: What was his name?
Brian: Nottius Maximus, sir.
Centurion: [giggle]
Pontius Pilate: Centuwion do you have anyone in your gawwison by that name?
Centurion: No, sir.
Pontius Pilate: Well you seem awfully sure, have you checked?
Centurion: I think its a joke, sir. Sort of like...uh...Sillius Sodus, or Biggus Dickus. (guards giggle)
Pontius Pilate: What's so funny about "Biggus Dickus?"
Centurion: Its a joke name, sir.
Pontius Pilate: I have a vewy good fwiend in Wome named "Biggus Dickus."
[guard laughs]
Pontius Pilate: WIGHT! THATS IT!
Centurion: Oh, but sir...
Pontius Pilate: No, no, no. I want him fighting weally, wild, wavish animals by the mowning!
54
posted on
02/25/2004 3:52:45 PM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Principles, not blind loyalty)
To: Nick Danger
Good for him. Who needs Hollywierd any more? The only movies I've seen in the last four months are RotK and a special screening of
Army of Darkness.... "Come get some!"
COYDOG
![UNA Frontiers - an online graphic novel](http://members.rogers.com/coydog-arts/unaf20x40.gif)
55
posted on
02/25/2004 3:53:13 PM PST
by
coydog
(I love my country, I loathe its government. I AM Canadian.)
To: Petronski
![](http://members.shaw.ca/victoriausa/SaberCrouch.jpg)
Prior to DreamWorks, at least, these two clowns shoveled more crap into the American psyche than anyone I know. A pox on them if their 'power' seems threatened.
Katzenberg and Geffen are also both homosexuals. Think they might be biased against a powerful, sympathetic portrayal of Jesus, especially this month?
|
56
posted on
02/25/2004 3:53:21 PM PST
by
Sabertooth
(Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
To: SauronOfMordor
If the left boycotts Mel we can certainly boycott them. For the left, free speech is a one way street.
57
posted on
02/25/2004 3:53:45 PM PST
by
maggief
To: SauronOfMordor
Gee... Hollywood has a blacklist? Who would've thought!
McCarthy actually never started a "blacklist"... he was accused of leaking names, but that was never proven, and the evidence I've seen suggests to me that it was a staffer. The rest of the blacklist issue was people who obtained that list of names that was leaked and refused to hire them -of their own volition-, just as these producers are claiming. No blacklist was imposed by the government in any civilian position.
You know what even Ann Coulter missed in her book Treason? Jack Warner of Warner Brothers -privately requested- that McCarthy investigate and find the communists working for him in Hollywood. He was quoted as saying "they're everywhere".
But apparently, Hollywood's outrage over McCarthy is a total fabrication (what a surprise). Hollywood feels blacklists over a person's personal beliefs are entirely and completely appropriate. There is no difference between McCarthy and these people except that for Hollywood, it's Christianity that must be blacklisted.
The Left nauseates me.
Qwinn
58
posted on
02/25/2004 3:54:12 PM PST
by
Qwinn
To: Celtjew Libertarian
Yeah, he souds surprised at the most natural concept of belief.
As if this guy goes around thinking to hmself "Hey, my own world-view is completely wrong!". Not.
59
posted on
02/25/2004 3:54:19 PM PST
by
WOSG
(If we call Republicans the "Grand Old Party" lets call Democrats the Corrupt Radical Activist Party.)
To: Rutles4Ever
That is true. I hate violent movies. I wasn't going to see this one. But the more the left, who never complains about other violent movies, protests over the violence in this one, the more I know I have to see this.
60
posted on
02/25/2004 3:54:26 PM PST
by
jwalburg
(We CAN Question their Patriotism!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-279 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson