Skip to comments.
Gay Rights Groups Quiet on Marriage Issue
AJC ^
Posted on 02/25/2004 2:01:48 PM PST by GulliverSwift
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Al Gore got 75 percent of the votes cast by self-identified gays and lesbians in 2000, compared to 25 percent for Bush.
Shame on you, Bush. Get that down to .5 percent.
But even so, Patrick Guerriero, the executive director of the pro-gay Log Cabin Republicans, said the president's support of the amendment could prove politically costly. Guerriero said Bush could rekindle past political cultural wars and give independent voters cause to wonder ``whether or not the president and the party have embraced a creepy social agenda.''
These insidious people. How dare these perverts use the name "Republican." This reminds me of Russian spies who come to America and pretend to be Americans. They are RINO's except they're the kind of rhino who stays out of the mud to not look "icky" and for some reason doesn't like rhinos of the opposite sex.
``It's always disappointing when we find elected officials or candidates who do not support us 100 percent,'' said Winnie Stachelberg, political director of the Human Rights Campaign.
Setting your expectations a little high, aren't you ma'am/sir?
To: GulliverSwift
"Prominent gay rights groups are ready to issue an election-year pass to Democratic presidential front-runner John Kerry even though he opposes same-sex marriage"
First of all, every special interest group is ready to give a pass to any democratic presidential candidate on ANY issue.
Second of all... John Kerry does NOT OPPOSE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE!!! The fact that AP is spreading that lie is infuriating to me. He has supported gay marriage every time it has come to a vote. I hear he also wrote a letter opposing the massachussets state defense of marriage act.
2
posted on
02/25/2004 2:05:02 PM PST
by
Betaille
(Seeing through moral relativism since 2002)
To: GulliverSwift; All
Does anyone know how many "homosexuals" there are in America. Are we talking about in the millions or what? Talk about the "tail wagging the dog." I bet there are less than one percent in the entire population.
3
posted on
02/25/2004 2:05:35 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITIONS 55-58)
To: GulliverSwift
``But we understand that people are on a journey of becoming more understanding and more supportive of all that affects the gay and lesbian community.''READ: Very soon we will have your children convinced. In fact, we'll be bearing your grandchildren through surrogates. No matter what, we're gonna beat you down.
To: Betaille
What makes you think Kerry is in favor of pervert weddings?
5
posted on
02/25/2004 2:12:48 PM PST
by
GulliverSwift
(Keep the <a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/">gigolo</a> out of the White House!)
To: kellynla
My understanding is that queers and fagots make up about 2-4% of the population. Can't cite a source. Something I read somewhere.
6
posted on
02/25/2004 2:26:37 PM PST
by
upchuck
(Ta-ray-za now gets to execute her "maiming of choice." I'm hoping for eye gouging, how 'bout you?)
To: upchuck
The mayor of San Fag said it was "ten-plus" percent. Of course he's basing that on the Kinsey research, of prisoners, no less.
7
posted on
02/25/2004 2:28:36 PM PST
by
GulliverSwift
(Keep the <a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/">gigolo</a> out of the White House!)
To: GulliverSwift; little jeremiah
``But we understand that people are on a journey of becoming more understanding and more supportive of all that affects the gay and lesbian community.'' People? What people? Not THIS people, that's fer damn sure!!!
Y'all can just keep your sick, twisted, perverted "lifestyle" to yourselves.
Ping to ya lj.
8
posted on
02/25/2004 2:29:37 PM PST
by
upchuck
(Ta-ray-za now gets to execute her "maiming of choice." I'm hoping for eye gouging, how 'bout you?)
To: GulliverSwift
``The mortal danger that our community faces right now is not the battle to win the freedom to marry,'' Foreman said. ``It's having the battle shut down by a constitutional amendment.''I'd have thought a terrorist attack on a major American city might register a little higher on their "mortal danger" scale...but that's just me...what do I know?
9
posted on
02/25/2004 2:34:10 PM PST
by
GSWarrior
(If Debbie Schlussel wed John Stossel she'd be Debbie Schlussel-Stossel.)
To: GulliverSwift
The degenderization of America continues....as Leftist judges sneakily bring about a
de facto Equal Rights Amendment.
I'd love to have a bird's eye view of all the liberal webmasters busily changing webpages that define marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
I'll bet that they are in a hurry to get rid of any references to the millennia-old definition
For example:
Legaldefinitions.com has a table of "M" legal terms...which currently "happens" to omit the word marriage.
You have to do a google search of "marriage" and "definition" to get legaldefinitions' page with the definition of marriage,
marriage is the legal union of a man and woman as a husband and wife, though the definition might be evolving.
10
posted on
02/25/2004 2:39:01 PM PST
by
syriacus
(Lib courts get rid of gender in marriage = Courts get rid of any legal consideration of gender = ERA)
To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
People please note: The Log Cabin Republicans chose that name to promote the idea that Abraham Lincoln was a fellow homosexual. And the reason they call themselves "Republicans" is solely to get the GOP to veer towards the left, especially in the realm of "gay rights". They are insiduous and duplicitous.
Thanks to all for alerting me to useful articles.
And the number of homosexuals is very small, you can read about the various dependable studies that have been done over the last several years in the Categorical Index the EdReform always posts. The numbers I've seen are between 1.5 - 3%, mostly towards the smaller number.
11
posted on
02/25/2004 2:42:07 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
To: GulliverSwift
Gay Rights Groups Quiet on Marriage IssueNow this is news!
Homosexuals and lesbians are going to keep their mouths shut!
12
posted on
02/25/2004 2:44:57 PM PST
by
N. Theknow
(John Kerry is nothing more than Ted Kennedy without a dead girl in the car.)
To: GulliverSwift
``The mortal danger that our community faces right now is not the battle to win the freedom to marry,'' Foreman said.Just curious - who decided that being able to marry is a right? Why wouldn't it be considered a priviledge, like driving?
13
posted on
02/25/2004 2:45:52 PM PST
by
MEGoody
To: GulliverSwift
14
posted on
02/25/2004 2:45:52 PM PST
by
Tempest
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">)
To: GulliverSwift
The mayor of San Fag said it was "ten-plus" percent. Maybe if we were just talking that corner of California. If S.F. were to fall into the sea, the population percentage of same-gender sex folks would plummet.
15
posted on
02/25/2004 2:46:15 PM PST
by
mollynme
(cogito, ergo freepum)
To: kellynla
Talk about the "tail wagging the dog." Are you sure that's the tail?
16
posted on
02/25/2004 2:47:22 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: GulliverSwift
a creepy social agendaHow is preserving the definition of marriage that has existed in almost all times and cultures a "creepy social agenda"? An agenda implies one is changing something. It is the gay activists who have a creepy social agenda -- and it's working out beautifully for them.
To: GulliverSwift
Democratic presidential front-runner John Kerry even though he opposes same-sex marriage This is a lie. He is saying he opposes it, but he would be for it if he were President. I believe this issue is going to hurt the Democrats and I think they know it. So they'll try their best to lie out of it.
18
posted on
02/25/2004 2:51:54 PM PST
by
swampfox98
(Beyond 2004 - Chaos! 200 million illegals waiting in the wings)
To: GulliverSwift
"settling for less than they want in hopes of avoiding a constitutional amendment they fear"
Good! If they fear the amendment .. then that is exactly what we should do!!
19
posted on
02/25/2004 3:11:45 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: All; Betaille
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson