Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: looscnnn
If some disagree with Bush, that's fine. Constructive criticism is great. You said "there are those on the site that will flame you for disagreeing with the President." I doubt anyone will get flamed for disagreeing with the President. Now, more realistic, there are those on this site that will flame you for not voting for him. That was my point in my original comment.

Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything. - William of Ockham

157 posted on 02/25/2004 12:30:37 PM PST by m1-lightning (God, Guns, and Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: m1-lightning
"I doubt anyone will get flamed for disagreeing with the President. Now, more realistic, there are those on this site that will flame you for not voting for him."

Got news for you, I and others have been flamed for complaining about the illegal immigrants proposal. Not once did I say how I was going to vote nor did I say to vote for anyone. I was told (incorrectly) how I had voted in the past and how I would vote in this election by those that try to be Miss Cleo. They end up the same as her, wrong. Which was the point of MY original comment.
158 posted on 02/25/2004 12:37:16 PM PST by looscnnn (Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson