To: looscnnn
If some disagree with Bush, that's fine. Constructive criticism is great. You said "there are those on the site that will flame you for disagreeing with the President." I doubt anyone will get flamed for disagreeing with the President. Now, more realistic, there are those on this site that will flame you for not voting for him. That was my point in my original comment.
Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything. - William of Ockham
157 posted on
02/25/2004 12:30:37 PM PST by
m1-lightning
(God, Guns, and Country!)
To: m1-lightning
"I doubt anyone will get flamed for disagreeing with the President. Now, more realistic, there are those on this site that will flame you for not voting for him."
Got news for you, I and others have been flamed for complaining about the illegal immigrants proposal. Not once did I say how I was going to vote nor did I say to vote for anyone. I was told (incorrectly) how I had voted in the past and how I would vote in this election by those that try to be Miss Cleo. They end up the same as her, wrong. Which was the point of MY original comment.
158 posted on
02/25/2004 12:37:16 PM PST by
looscnnn
(Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson