Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/15/2004 4:19:46 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

locked



Skip to comments.

Jesus Was Black, Not White, Group Says
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 2/24/04 | Melanie Hunter

Posted on 02/24/2004 10:06:43 PM PST by kattracks

(1st Add: Includes comments by Rev. Jesse Peterson, president of B.O.N.D.)

(CNSNews.com) - One day before it debuts in theaters, a black activist group is protesting the Mel Gibson-written, directed and produced "The Passion of the Christ" film, not because of the film's violent depiction of Jesus Christ's final hours. Instead, they say the film is historically inaccurate because Jesus is portrayed as a white man, not a black man.

"Strangely absent from the debate is one very basic inaccuracy which has been long promoted in order to bolster white supremacy and maintain a revisionist history that is beneficial to only people of European descent," said Malik Z. Shabazz, national chairman of the New Black Panther Party in a statement Tuesday.

"This purposely omitted fact is that Jesus was not a European white man. Jesus Christ was a black man - a dark skinned Hebrew Israelite from Northern Africa and even the only Biblical physical description confirms this (Rev. 13:20)," said Shabazz.

"Not only does this film wrongfully depict Christ as white but all the disciples and Israelites are people of European descent, which presents a historical and physical impossibility," he added.

The New Black Panther Party and other black activists plan to stage protests nationwide over the controversy. Not only does the group claim the movie is "false," but also "harmful and racist."

The Anti-Defamation League recently expressed to Gibson its concern that the film would drum up anti-Semetism. Shabazz said his group disagrees with the ADL's claims that the film is "anti-semetic" and challenged the ADL to "deny the historical accuracy of the Jews' attack on Christ."

But Shabazz says, the "true controversy" surrounding the film "lies in the maligned history of African people through the world and the continual inaccuracies presented in every Hollywood production to date of any Biblical story from the 10 Commandments to the Christmas Story."

"These false images presented are 'anti-black' and these false images and interpretations only seek to further the racist and white supremist idea that God and Jesus Christ 'The Messiah' or 'Savior' is European and white," he added.

"This is clearly one more example of how black people in this country are treated unfairly. Black/African history has and continues to be misrepresented, black people worldwide are subjected to the psychologically abusive images of white supremacy and have no collective voice to defend or promote a Black agenda," Shabazz concluded.

Movie 'not racist,' says black conservative

But Rev. Jesse Peterson, president of the black conservative group, B.O.N.D. (Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny) said claims that Jesus is black takes away from the overall message.

Peterson said he saw the movie last weekend and "there's nothing in this movie that is racist at all."

"It was inspiring spiritually," he said. "I think that it's gonna reconfirm the faith in many Christians and it's gonna encourage those who had doubt about Christ. There will be many, I believe, that will believe in him. I knew that this thing would come out that 'he wasn't black' and that 'it's racist.' It's not."

Peterson explained that "the Bible clearly states that Christ was in Israel and that he was a Jew." The movie, he said "clearly points that out as well."

Peterson said to "cry racism is a non-issue. This is an attempt for attention. It's shameful to make that kind of assertion about this movie."

When asked specifically whether Shabazz's physical description of Jesus and his birthplace of Northern Africa was accurate, Peterson said, "I've heard that over and over again, and at one point when I resented white Americans, I believed that too."

But, he said, "in all honesty there is no, I think, perfect description of what Christ looked like anyway, and I think that each race…the white race at one point said that he looked white [with] blue eyes and blond hair. That wasn't true. The blacks are trying to claim him…Hispanics, everybody are trying to claim him as their own."

Peterson said that's why the Scripture clearly states "'do not create a graven image of him, because it will divide and cause confusion.'

"The most important thing is that he was a spirit. It's the spirit of the man, not necessarily what he looked like. And that's the focus that this movie brings out," Peterson said, adding that he thinks blacks and white are likely to focus on Jesus' "spirit rather than the color."

He said the Bible does point out that Jesus was "born in that area, but still he was a Jew, and at that time, maybe they didn't have the straight hair, but it doesn't mean he was…a black, African man."

Peterson said in the movie, Jesus is a dark-skinned man, not white with blue eyes, but a dark-skinned man. "He's not black, but he's not white either," he said.

Race not an issue

Peterson took the New Black Panther Party to task for making Jesus' race an issue.

"It's a shame that you have racist organizations like the New Black Panther Party that will come out and allow the devil or darkness to use them, because that's what's happening," he said. "It's a distraction. It's a trick of the devil to come out and call this movie racist…that he was black, he had nappy hair. That's a distraction."

Peterson believes the group is taking away from the spiritual message of the movie, a message, he said that can possibly help people that are hurting spiritually.

"I think that when people go to this movie, they need to look beyond the color. And I think most will, whether they want to or not…look at the spirit and the suffering that Christ went through," Peterson said.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.




TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blackpanthers; christ; christians; jessepeterson; newblackpantherparty; racebaiting; racialdivision; racism; thepassion; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last
To: dead
*LOL* that's right! What I meant to say is that since none of these people who say Jesus was white,black,etc. were alive back then who really cares? These DUmmies think skin tone is equaled to culture, and if Jesus is black that means he likes crappy Louie Farrakhan speeches like me.
41 posted on 02/24/2004 10:28:42 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming
"Did Jesus have DNA?"

Good question. Did Adam and Eve have belly buttons?
42 posted on 02/24/2004 10:29:15 PM PST by abishai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: abishai
A ruddy complexion is reddish, but not necessarily including the hair.
43 posted on 02/24/2004 10:29:42 PM PST by luvbach1 (In the know on the border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: txzman
Then there is always Kinky Friedman and the Texas Jewboy's song "They Ain't Makin' Jews LiKe Jesus Anymore"
44 posted on 02/24/2004 10:29:42 PM PST by woofie ( If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
One problem here. There is no Rev 13:20
45 posted on 02/24/2004 10:30:41 PM PST by Texboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper; Iberian
Revelations 13:20....Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me

LOL. someone is adding things to the bible... BTW- this one makes no mention of color.

46 posted on 02/24/2004 10:30:43 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Founda that here http://www.planetlightworker.com/articles/judybeebe/article1.htm
47 posted on 02/24/2004 10:31:29 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Black guy and a white guy were arguing whether God is a black man or a white man.

As fate would have it, they both die in the same car accident

They hit heaven together and meet their Maker, who greets them with with
" buenos dias, amigos"
48 posted on 02/24/2004 10:32:25 PM PST by stylin19a (Is it vietnam yet ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Rev.Peterson always says the right thing. What a wonderful man.
49 posted on 02/24/2004 10:32:27 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming
I've never heard it posited that Jesus on earth was not human in every way, which of course would include DNA.
50 posted on 02/24/2004 10:32:29 PM PST by luvbach1 (In the know on the border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I fired off a letter to CNSNews at the link provided.

Here's the text:

"Concerning the article Jesus Was Black, Not White, Group Says, by Melanie Hunter, dated 02/24/04...

"I believe Ms. Hunter may have been a touch negligent in her research. This group claims that Revelations 13:20 claims that Jesus was black. There IS no Revelations 13:20. Chapter 13 of Revelations ends with Verse 18. I have asked around and no one can find any version of a Bible that has a Revelations Chapter 13 with more than 18 verses.

"I'm not even a practicing Christian, I'm agnostic. For all I know or care, maybe Jesus -was- black, but don't you think it would be rather incumbent upon a reporter to fact-check something that would be so unbelievably easy to check?

"Ms. Hunter has given the legitimacy of press coverage to this group who are making completely unfounded claims on not just misinterpreted but actively non-existent Bible verses.

I don't want the story pulled. I want a follow-up story where Ms. Hunter goes back to the group and asks them precisely -why- they misled her by citing a fictional Bible verse, and displays as much outrage at the deception as this group claims against Mel Gibson. I would like to hear not just about "purposefully ommitted facts", but purposefully fabricated facts. I would think she'd be pretty angry about it... assuming she didn't know at the time the story was published........ and wasn't in on it........ which is quite an assumption to make actually........"

Qwinn
51 posted on 02/24/2004 10:32:43 PM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Maybe he should pay more attention to Revelation 22:18.
52 posted on 02/24/2004 10:32:57 PM PST by abishai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: abishai
LOL! Nice catch!

Here's 22:18, for those who don't have a Bible handy:

"I warn every one who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plauges described in this book".

Too funny. This couldn't have been any more specifically addressed. Man. Talk about literally playing with fire...

Qwinn
53 posted on 02/24/2004 10:36:23 PM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MCH
""Everyone knows JFK was black!""

Now I am confused. I thought Clinton was the first black president.

Blessings, Bobo
54 posted on 02/24/2004 10:36:26 PM PST by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
[ Instead, they say the film is historically inaccurate because Jesus is portrayed as a white man, not a black man. ]

Are we talkin Micheal Jackson white, Julian Bond white, or Tony Brown white.. ?

55 posted on 02/24/2004 10:37:17 PM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Maybe Mel should just answer that he was Bill Clinton black.

Qwinn
56 posted on 02/24/2004 10:38:16 PM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: bogdanPolska12
OK to all. When you read this article I made a mistake
I notice later some problems. I would like to apologize. It is my fault. Please Moderator remove this it is no suitable for this thread.

57 posted on 02/24/2004 10:38:28 PM PST by bogdanPolska12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
That looks like Bobby DeNiro.
58 posted on 02/24/2004 10:38:52 PM PST by luvbach1 (In the know on the border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
How does one answer this kind of lunacy? Just walk away, shaking your head. These people are insane.
59 posted on 02/24/2004 10:38:54 PM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abishai
LMAO at your joke.
Very good!
60 posted on 02/24/2004 10:39:06 PM PST by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson