Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sounds about right.
1 posted on 02/24/2004 4:20:02 PM PST by AZLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AZLiberty
tag to watch ...
2 posted on 02/24/2004 4:26:58 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
We are all dead...in the long haul.
3 posted on 02/24/2004 4:27:21 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
14. National/global protection of intellectual capital-property is imperative.

I must not understand. Does this mean that, for example, American intellectual capital must be protected all around the world? Or does it mean that American intellectual capital is now "Global?"

4 posted on 02/24/2004 4:29:56 PM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
in the long haul

That's a neat rhetorical trick, since "in the long haul" noone's going to remember your rosy predictions and noone's going to hold you responsible for them.

6 posted on 02/24/2004 4:42:51 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
Big companies are not "built to last;" they almost inexorably are "built to decline."

Without big companies would there be a Tom Peters?
8 posted on 02/24/2004 4:50:17 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
I read y-day that off-shoring service jobs (customer service and coding) is basically limited to 4 countries, Ireland, Canada, Great Britain, and India. Of those 4, India is limited to 3,000,000 people with sufficient english skills to be effective customer service representatives.
11 posted on 02/24/2004 5:04:40 PM PST by Lokibob (All typos and spelling errors are mine and copyrighted!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
Now the globaloons admit it. America is selling itself out (the so called "unearned wage advantage") in the relentless pursuit of bargains which in the long haul aren't bargains at all.
13 posted on 02/24/2004 5:08:21 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
6. Americans' "unearned wage advantage" (Born in the U.S.A.) could be erased ... permanently.

Looks like the author forgot a quote "worth noting/quoting":

"People vote their pocketbooks"

The idiot politician who thinks that Americans recieve an "unearned wage advantage" is doomed.

15 posted on 02/24/2004 5:22:49 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
"The new organization of society implied by the triumph of individual autonomy and the true equalization of opportunity based upon merit will lead to very great rewards for merit and great individual autonomy. This will leave individuals far more responsible for themselves that they have been accustomed to being during the industrial period. It will also reduce the unearned advantage in living standards that has been enjoyed by residents of advanced industrial societies throughout the twentieth century." (Governor, Bank of England)

It's ironic that people who support "free trade" use quotes like this. I don't think freedom is what is giving places like China a wage advantage. I imagine the later part of the quote is true in that we may all be living in the third world. Except, of course for our masters.

16 posted on 02/24/2004 5:46:08 PM PST by briant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
That sounds like the kind of logic which could get John Kerry elected president...
20 posted on 02/24/2004 6:11:35 PM PST by greenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
Crap, Tom Peters kind of resembles Teddy Ruxpin Dick "miserable failure" Gephardt.
26 posted on 02/24/2004 6:38:38 PM PST by LowCountryJoe (Shameless way to get you to view my FR homepage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
True and salient point commentators like Ralph Peters are consistently missing - at least in terms of significance:

"In the long term" may refer to 20-50 years down the road. And the intervening years are politically unsustainable under our current political system.

40 posted on 02/24/2004 7:21:01 PM PST by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AZLiberty
The proper role of a healthily functioning economy is to destroy jobs and put labor to use elsewhere.
Sounds like they only got one half of the equation figured out. In a healthy economy, people are pulled into new jobs, not pushed out.

46 posted on 02/24/2004 8:09:06 PM PST by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson