Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SEN. JOHN KERRY’S KERRYMANDERING VOL. 2, ISSUE 1 Kerry Evasive And Confusing On Gay Marriage
RNC ^ | Feb 19 2004 | N/A

Posted on 02/24/2004 11:22:38 AM PST by Dog

SEN. JOHN KERRY’S KERRYMANDERING

VOL. 2, ISSUE 1

Kerry Evasive And Confusing On Gay Marriage

_________________________________________________________

FACING POLITICAL PRESSURE, KERRY SAYS HE MIGHT

SUPPORT AMENDMENT BANNING GAY MARRIAGE

Kerry Won’t Rule Out Supporting Amendment To Massachusetts Constitution Banning Gay Marriage. “Asked if he would support a state constitutional amendment barring gay and lesbian marriages, Kerry didn’t rule out the possibility. ‘I’ll have to see what language there is,’ he said.” (Susan Milligan, “Kerry Says GOP May Target Him On ‘Wedge Issue,’” The Boston Globe, 2/6/04)

BUT IN 2003, KERRY SUGGESTED HE MIGHT SUPPORT GAY MARRIAGE IF IT BECAME PUBLICLY ACCEPTABLE

On Question Of Gay Marriage, Kerry Said, “We Need To Achieve What We Can, And Then We Will See Where We Are.” Kerry believes civil unions “would be more acceptable to the public than marriage for homosexual couples. Kerry indicated he might eventually back gay marriages if a public consensus developed for them. ‘We need to achieve what we can, and then we will see where we are,’ he said.” (Ronald Brownstein, “Gay Issues Get Democratic Field’s Backing,” Los Angeles Times, 7/16/03)

IN 2002, HE SIGNED LETTER REJECTING MASSACHUSETTS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT BANNING GAY MARRIAGE

Kerry Said It Would Be “Grave Error” For Massachusetts To Adopt Amendment Banning Gay Marriage. “We believe it would be a grave error for Massachusetts to enshrine in our Constitution a provision which would have such a negative effect on so many of our fellow residents. … We are therefore united in urging you to reject this Constitutional amendment and avoid stigmatizing so many of our fellow citizens who do not deserve to be treated in such a manner.” (Sen. John Kerry, et al, Letter To Members Of The Massachusetts Legislature, 7/12/02)

AND IN 1996, HE VOTED AGAINST DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT

Kerry Was One Of Only 14 Senators To Vote Against 1996 Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA), Which Banned Federal Recognition Of Gay Marriage And Same-Sex Partner Benefits. (H.R. 3396, CQ Vote #280: Passed 85-14: R 53-0; D 32-14, 9/10/96, Kerry Voted Nay)

Kerry Called DOMA “Unconstitutional, Unprecedented And Unnecessary,” And “Politics At Its Worst.” “DOMA is unconstitutional, unprecedented and unnecessary. Again, I return to the original questions: What is its legislative purpose? What is its motivation? What does passage of this bill mean for the country? It is hard to believe that this bill is anything other than a thinly veiled attempt to score political debating points by scapegoating gay and lesbian Americans. That is politics at its worst …” (Sen. John Kerry [D-MA], Congressional Record, 9/10/96, p. 10108)

… Confused? We Are, Too.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; civilunion; kerry; marriage; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Peach
Julius Kerry: “Veni Vidi Flippi
21 posted on 02/24/2004 2:21:19 PM PST by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dog
BTW .. Since Kerry and Edwards think it's up to the states to decide on gay marriage ... I wonder what they think about the Courts taking that right away and deciding what they think states rights should or shouldn't be?

22 posted on 02/24/2004 3:10:42 PM PST by Mo1 (" Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commish; Mo1
Can you point me to that thread..
23 posted on 02/24/2004 3:21:21 PM PST by Dog (Bin Laden your account to America is past due......time to pay up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Kerry says he doesn't support gay marriage, but he also doesn't support restrictions on it. He then can claim he is opposed to gay marriage while he holds open the backdoor (no pun intended) so that it can become legal.

Wow, that's Orwellian double-think at its very best. He says he does not support gay marriage, but he also doesn't think we should 'tamper with the Constitution,' leaving the opening for activist judges to declare it a civil right, much like in Roe Vs. Wade. He therefore gets to have his waffle, and eat it too.

24 posted on 02/24/2004 6:15:19 PM PST by atomicpossum (Only Hillary Will Lick Bush in '04!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
bump!!! Go get him !!!
25 posted on 02/24/2004 6:17:57 PM PST by BobFromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dog

26 posted on 02/24/2004 6:32:00 PM PST by atomicpossum (Only Hillary Will Lick Bush in '04!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert
@
27 posted on 02/28/2004 11:44:59 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson