Please get your facts straight before you make an ill-informed flame.
First off, if drugs were legal, the father would not have needed to prostitute his daughter to buy them. The drugs would be readily available and cheap.
Secondly, Legalize prostitition has no bearing on this. This girl was FORCED (ie. raped) and was not an adult. Which leads to point #3.
I'm unaware of any Libertarian who wants to see children sexually abused. This is just a flat out lie, intended so smear and degrade those who do not think as you do. A little knowlege about Libertarians may be benefitial to you. You apparently have a woefully poor information source on them. I'm also unaware of Libertarians who would give whiskey to 4 year olds. The bottom line is that mankind has for thousands of years managed to live their lives without the gov't dictating what you can eat, drink, smoke, chew; and how old you must be before you partake in these things. Libertarians want to take responsibility for themselves, not shirk responsibility by placing the burden on a gov't agency.
Get Gov't out of our lives is a mantra of just about all Republicans and Libertarians. This does not mean we are against police forces, medical services, roads, sewage, power and defense. Again, a little common sense and courtesy is expected.
What this monster did is inexcuseable, and I doubt you'll find any Republican, Conservative, Libertarian or any 'normal' person who would defend this type of behavior. By the same token, I doubt anyone else would accuse another group of defending this behavior without some basis.
That is just false.
No Judeo-Christian moral absolutes.
We have that now?!?!
Headline would have read, "15 year old girl shoots attempted rapists. Files lawsuite against father for violation of her sovereign Rights. Father killed during duel with a concerned bystander."
Legalize drugs.
Legalize prostitution.
Legal age of consent is voided.
No gov't intervention in any activity.
No Judeo-Christian moral absolutes.
OK, well I'll go ahead and answer this: Legalize drugs.
Instead of needing $100 for his cocaine or heroin habit Junkie Dad can buy a weeks supply for $10 at the pharmacy, just like generic aspirin. He gets his $10 bucks recycling cans, like most winos today.
Legalize prostitution.
Mr. Freak Dealer, now in another line of work, goes to the local licensed brothel to have sex with a willing seller.
Legal age of consent is voided.
I've never heard this suggested by any libertarian think tank, the LP, or any candidate for Pres. running as a L. So this is a weak straw man. However, even so it is meaningless. The victim was not consenting, thus even if this were changed the act described would be rape.
No Judeo-Christian moral absolutes.
Again, not a part of any Libertarian platform I've ever seen. And again, what does it have to do with the story. I bet you $10 if you asked the three perps involved what their religion is they would all say "Christian". In Portland we are in the death penalty phase trial of a rapist / killer. His dad is a minister. Adherence to Judeo-Christian moral absolutes usually doesn't work for criminals, despite the fact that most of them claim to. Libertarianism is a political philosophy, not a religous ones. Libertarians strongly agree with many Judeo Christian absolutes such as "though shalt not kill" and "though shalt not steal". They would not agree with laws supporting "though shalt keep the sabath holy". I believe one can reasonably argue how much of a specific moral code should be turned into law in a secular republic without throwing laws against rape, kidnapping and murder out the window. I believe one can be a strong a Christian and a Libertarian at the same time, I know some.
In summary your characature is just that.
Legalize drugs.
Legalize prostitution.
Legal age of consent is voided.
No gov't intervention in any activity.
No Judeo-Christian moral absolutes.
OK, well I'll go ahead and answer this: Legalize drugs.
Instead of needing $100 for his cocaine or heroin habit Junkie Dad can buy a weeks supply for $10 at the pharmacy, just like generic aspirin. He gets his $10 bucks recycling cans, like most winos today.
Legalize prostitution.
Mr. Freak Dealer, now in another line of work, goes to the local licensed brothel to have sex with a willing seller.
Legal age of consent is voided.
I've never heard this suggested by any libertarian think tank, the LP, or any candidate for Pres. running as a L. So this is a weak straw man. However, even so it is meaningless. The victim was not consenting, thus even if this were changed the act described would be rape.
No Judeo-Christian moral absolutes.
Again, not a part of any Libertarian platform I've ever seen. And again, what does it have to do with the story. I bet you $10 if you asked the three perps involved what their religion is they would all say "Christian". In Portland we are in the death penalty phase trial of a rapist / killer. His dad is a minister. Adherence to Judeo-Christian moral absolutes usually doesn't work for criminals, despite the fact that most of them claim to. Libertarianism is a political philosophy, not a religous ones. Libertarians strongly agree with many Judeo Christian absolutes such as "though shalt not kill" and "though shalt not steal". They would not agree with laws supporting "though shalt keep the sabath holy". I believe one can reasonably argue how much of a specific moral code should be turned into law in a secular republic without throwing laws against rape, kidnapping and murder out the window. I believe one can be a strong a Christian and a Libertarian at the same time, I know some.
In summary your characature is just that.
Legalize drugs.
Legalize prostitution.
Legal age of consent is voided.
No gov't intervention in any activity.
No Judeo-Christian moral absolutes.
OK, well I'll go ahead and answer this: Legalize drugs.
Instead of needing $100 for his cocaine or heroin habit Junkie Dad can buy a weeks supply for $10 at the pharmacy, just like generic aspirin. He gets his $10 bucks recycling cans, like most winos today.
Legalize prostitution.
Mr. Freak Dealer, now in another line of work, goes to the local licensed brothel to have sex with a willing seller.
Legal age of consent is voided.
I've never heard this suggested by any libertarian think tank, the LP, or any candidate for Pres. running as a L. So this is a weak straw man. However, even so it is meaningless. The victim was not consenting, thus even if this were changed the act described would be rape.
No Judeo-Christian moral absolutes.
Again, not a part of any Libertarian platform I've ever seen. And again, what does it have to do with the story. I bet you $10 if you asked the three perps involved what their religion is they would all say "Christian". In Portland we are in the death penalty phase trial of a rapist / killer. His dad is a minister. Adherence to Judeo-Christian moral absolutes usually doesn't work for criminals, despite the fact that most of them claim to. Libertarianism is a political philosophy, not a religous ones. Libertarians strongly agree with many Judeo Christian absolutes such as "though shalt not kill" and "though shalt not steal". They would not agree with laws supporting "though shalt keep the sabath holy". I believe one can reasonably argue how much of a specific moral code should be turned into law in a secular republic without throwing laws against rape, kidnapping and murder out the window. I believe one can be a strong a Christian and a Libertarian at the same time, I know some.
In summary your characature is just that.