If Nichols can prove that to the judge, what would be the point in having a jury? Supposing he did prove it to the judge and was assassinated before the jury heard the testimony. What would the judge be required to do with the information?
Makes one wonder what happened to whatever Oswald might have said to anyone before he was assassinated.
Oh crap man!
Read something authoratative on Oswald or the JFK assassination instead of that conspiracy crap -
- or at LEAST an account of that messed-up boy's early life and existence as told by his brother Robert! It's NOT like there is *no* verifiable, first-hand information on Oswald you know ...
Also, to help get you started on your Kennedy assassination 12-step program see:
Michael Beck -- Reformed Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Buff