Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DVD copying software ruled illegal
Newscientist.com ^ | 2/24/2004 | Celeste Biever

Posted on 02/24/2004 6:25:20 AM PST by Born Conservative

DVD copying software ruled illegal

11:10 24 February 04

NewScientist.com news service

Selling software bypassing copyright protection mechanisms on DVDs is illegal - even if the purpose is to make back-up copies for personal use, a California court has ruled.

The ruling clarifies ambiguities in the controversial Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA), but is a blow to consumers who rely on back-up copies of DVDs to safeguard against damage to the original.

Ruling in favour of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) on Friday, Judge Susan Illston said that within the next seven days, the software company 321 Studios of St Louis, Missouri must stop selling their software suite called DVD X Copy.

The software allows users to copy a DVD movie to a hard drive or to another blank DVD, even though the compressed MPEG code on the disc is usually digitally encrypted using the Content Scrambling System (CSS). CSS makes conventional copies unplayable.

The case was widely viewed as a test of the scope of the 1998 DMCA, which until now was ambiguous. Although the Act states that any "device" designed to "circumvent" a copy-protection mechanism is illegal - it also includes a get-out clause for "fair use". 321 Studios had hoped this clause would include making back-up copies of DVDs for personal use.

However, the court did not agree. "It is the technology itself at issue, not the uses to which the copyrighted material may be put," writes Illston.

Unscrambled code

But some lawyers disagree with this interpretation of the DMCA. "We don't think Congress intended to de facto eliminate fair use," says Cindy Cohn, legal director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco.

She points out that the ruling does not make sense: "Under the DMCA, you have a theoretical right to fair use. But this ruling shows that if you provide a tool for fair use you can't use it."

Jonathan Band, an intellectual property lawyer at Morrison and Foerster in Washington, DC, agrees: "It's bad public policy and it makes no sense."

321 has been selling its DVD X Copy software since the end of 2002, for $100. X Copy uses a conventional DVD ROM player to unscramble the MPEG code for legitimate playback, and then sends it to a temporary cache file on the PC's hard drive. From there X Copy copies the unscrambled MPEG code onto a blank DVD using a conventional DVD burner.

Well-priced product

321 had hoped that the recent increase in the popularity of DVDs combined with their obvious fragility would persuade the court that this was a case of fair use. "The MPAA has not brought any real evidence to light that anyone has used our software in an illegal way," says 321 Studios spokesperson Julia Bishop-Cross.

For unlike the music industry, which is lashing out at file-sharers because of a plunge in sales, DVD sales are on the rise. "This is the clearest example of a complete lack of any need" to outlaw the 321 product, says Band. "DVDs are a good-product, well-priced so people are willing to spend the money."

321 will appeal the ruling. Because the decision was based on the interpretation of a murky section of the DMCA, Band says it is possible that it will be reversed. "It's conceivable that court will look at it and construe it differently," he told New Scientist.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 321studios; dmca; dvdxcopy; mpaa

1 posted on 02/24/2004 6:25:20 AM PST by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Ha! A California court ruled in favor of the motion picture industry - what a shock! I hope they take this to the Supremes.
2 posted on 02/24/2004 6:29:17 AM PST by prion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
So much for the concept of Fair Use.
3 posted on 02/24/2004 6:30:25 AM PST by FreedomPoster (This space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Will Windows soon be illegal? It can copy cd's
4 posted on 02/24/2004 6:33:48 AM PST by Rams82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Can't you just go to the command line (or file browser) and copy the files to your hard drive and then, in the trusty CD/DVD - RW device do the same thing? Or are they going to make that illegal? In any event it doesn't sound like brain surgery (not that I've ever done such a thing, mind you).
5 posted on 02/24/2004 6:34:43 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay
I believe the problem is the actual video track is encrypted and can only be unlocked for playing or copying using firmware keys built into the DVD player. X-Copy uses those same firmware keys to unlock the file for copying.

I may be wrong, but that's my understanding.

6 posted on 02/24/2004 6:41:23 AM PST by Jonah Hex (Another day, another DU troll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
The motion picture industry needs to learn, I am not purchasing a medium but rather the data itself. In the future, new standards and hardware for playing things are going to be developed every couple of years or less (similar to Moore's law). What are they going to ask us to do- purchase a new video player every two years and buy a whole new video library every time?

Eventually, they're going to have to work out a compromise or some sort. I am not going to keep buying the same movies over and over again just because a new player comes out that makes the old one obsolete. I want the ability to use my old (but good) data in a new format. How many times am I supposed to buy Casablanca?

For Pete's sake.
7 posted on 02/24/2004 7:32:58 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
These Hollywood jackasses fought Sony on videotape in the 80's and screamed when they lost...without videotape, most movies would never get made. Idiots keep fighting and losing the same war...
8 posted on 02/24/2004 7:43:11 AM PST by Keith (IT'S ABOUT THE JUDGES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
This is garbage: I can make a copy of an audio tape, or a photocopy of a page in a book, or a VHS copy for my *own* personal use - but not a DVD?
9 posted on 02/24/2004 9:23:30 AM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
precisely! Why stop at software? Why don't they make copy machines illegal, since they can be used to copy sheet music for illegal distribution?
10 posted on 02/24/2004 12:21:39 PM PST by TheMightyQuinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Let 'um rule it illegal.
I just checked Gnutella.
There's close to 200 copies of it available for download.
11 posted on 02/24/2004 12:38:03 PM PST by Freebird Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
There's close to 200 copies of it available for download.

Good Luck. I have the program (paid for it) and I can tell you that it is an act of congress to get it to work. You have to call the company to get release codes and often that does not even do the trick. You have to recall and hopefully by the third time it works. It is a series of release codes that require the first the release the second to release the third ect...

I would quickly buy the program while you still could and make backup copies. It does work great btw...I have made about 5 or 6 DVD's myself, but it is time consuming and often the longer movies take 2 disks instead of one because the multi-layered originals can not be duplicated on just one single layer dvd-r. I use the DVD-R format, but have a Sony that will do most other version (ex. Dvd+R) too.

Smile
LowOiL

12 posted on 02/24/2004 12:46:03 PM PST by LowOiL (Christian and proud of it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
I would quickly buy the program while you still could

Unless the program has a version for Mac's, I'll have to pass.

13 posted on 02/24/2004 1:38:47 PM PST by Freebird Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
Unless the program has a version for Mac's, I'll have to pass.


14 posted on 02/24/2004 3:54:24 PM PST by LowOiL (Christian and proud of it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson