To: jerseygirl
Miami was the only one I questioned. IMHO Seattle or Chicago seemed more likely targets.
1,932 posted on
03/01/2004 5:14:27 PM PST by
MamaDearest
(If you could tell a terrorist, you couldn't tell him much!)
To: MamaDearest
I wish we knew the truth. I'm figuring that they wouldn't have continued repeating for Muslims to leave NY,DC, and LA if those cities weren't on the hit list.
However, if they could sabotage the Indian Point reactor, and cause a meltdown, they wouldn't need any "nukes" in the NY metro area.
Do we have any more information about the validity of their threats?
One thing that Sean said that really troubled me was that these initial threats were only to set the stage for the use of the nukes.
One nuke plant melting would cause incredible devastation. If it were Indian Point, there would simply be no way to evacuate all the people affected.
It leads me to wonder if our leaders are under trememdous pressure to initiate pre-emptive action. But where could they direct it?
I do think the speedy Haiti move is a cover for handling Cuba.
And I think the forces in Pakistan aren't there to find OBL- they are there to secure the Paki nukes from extremists.
Just a thought. What do you think?
To: MamaDearest
"Miami was the only one I questioned"
Demographics... it's long been the NYers playground.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson