To: jerseygirl
Here's my theory
They are denying it vehemently ONLY because they wanted to 'spring; it when they choose to
{{{U.S. military officials have said they are planning a spring offensive in Afghanistan in the hopes of capturing bin Laden, former Taliban leader Mullah Omar and their associates. }}}
1,611 posted on
02/28/2004 9:56:24 PM PST by
JustPiper
(The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)
To: JustPiper
Ok, here's my theory:
Is it possible we would NEVER announce the capture of OBL? Even if he is in hand? Just get all the intel we could and then vaporize him? They (AQ) seem to know we have him, some in our Military seem to know we have him, but no official word.
The reason I suggest this would be AQ has it planned to detonate nukes and such WHEN OBL is captured.
The story of OBL's capture originated in Iran. Iran is in some serious deeeeeeeep doodoo right now.
The IEAE is even on their case! (/sarcasm)
With the announcement in Worlnet Daily that Iran could produce an atomic bomb within days, how long will Isreal allow Iran to maintain this capability?
And Isreal with those nice shiny new F-16's!
Iran may be very anxious for AQ to play their trump card.
Link that with the just finished terrorist conference that was held in Terhan. It certainly would have been a good time to orchestrate events.
So Terhan wants us to announce OBL's capture to initiate the AQ strikes against the US, but we don't play that game?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson