[jerseygirl]

Here is what Calpernia (thank you Calpernia) posted on the other thread:

My friend translated this:

http://64.246.51.45/vb/showthread.php?s=e8cd9271cf964b321472b598ade9961e&threadid=102891

After the end of February º you will be on the receiving end of Al Qaeda

And it will appear that the attack will be a surprise and without previous warning.
The first preemtive attack will be outside of America

America digs its grave from the north; Osama has sworn this in a solumn oath

The images that accompany this message are one of Osama sitting at a desk, two of the WTC in flames,
one of a flyover of NYC, and one of Osama over a blackboard.
The text on the blackboard says
basically that the dates on the message are not correct and the unexpected should be expected;
what is here is there and what is there is here.

My interpretation is that the attack will be before the end
of February and will probably not be outside the US. I suspect CA or Hawaii, but most likely something
from the south, not the north. I may be completely wrong on this - but that's my take on the message.

Please read this in conjunction with the message in the same forum regarding the 100 staircases for
100 militants who will need them in the coming three days. Basically - I'm interpreting this to be something within the next 72 hours.

This would be consistent with the release of the Zawahiri tape today. Historically Zawahiri tapes have preceded an attack on a civilian target by 1-3 days. The list below isn't complete but I think there's enough to discern a pattern. I am still looking for some dates to fill in - i.e. Mombasa.

I also think that there is substantial reason here to believe that something major was averted in December.
Notice all the shoulder taps from Bin Laden and Company but no major attacks.


10 posted on 02/24/2004 12:39:18 PM PST by Calpernia (http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)

[freeperfromnj]

Thanks for reposting, I completely missed it.

[rickylc]

but most likely something from the south, not the north.

This is a scary development then. What if the sinking of this ship in the Mississippi is to cause confusion so that an AQ attack ship can slip through easily when the channel is re-openned? (Thanks to NW_Arizona_Granny for bringing this up several times, it stuck in my mind)

I'm sure there are captain's screaming to be let in with as little delay as possible once the channel is re-opened.

The confusion would be a perfect opportunity to slip in with less scrutiny.

I hope our DHS guys are on this possibility!!!

Workers concentrate on moving boat blocking Mississippi River

[Velveeta]

Thanks for reposting Jerseygirl. I wasn't watching the other thread and would have missed it completely.

Calpernia, thank you to your friend for the translation.

[freeperfromnj]

The first preemtive attack will be outside of America

America digs its grave from the north

If we were to give any credence to this at all, could they be planning on hitting Canada first?

[JustPiper]

Why is Cal not posting this here?

From the North to me would mean Alaska?

[JustPiper]

By the way JG link did not work?

[Try2Discern]

>>>http://64.246.51.45/vb/showthread.php?s=e8cd9271cf964b321472b598ade9961e&threadid=102891

>>>After the end of February º you will be on the receiving end of Al Qaeda

>>>And it will appear that the attack will be a surprise and without previous warning.

---

I am way behind on this thread, so I have no idea how seriously this info is being taken. A few things I noticed:

1) The date on the web page itself is April 2003.

2) A time of "after the end" of February.

3) 100 staircases for 100 militants in the coming three days

4) There is a "confused" smiley at the top. Maybe someone
was evaluating some bogus threat that never came to
pass...in 2003?