No, it is rather a fluke caused by the one sex inheritance of Y chromosome (or mitochondria in case of women). To transmit Y chr. you need to have uninterrupted succession of male descendents - you get only daughters and your Y is gone (even if your other genes pass through). To transmit mitochondrial genetic material you need to have uninterrupted succession of women.
So after number of generations you have one prevailing mitochondrial female ancestor and one prevailing Y male ancestor (in two different places and generations).
Granted. But it would be a bit unusual for that to happen with one of the natives to this extent and not with those who migrated in who would have had superior numbers as a general rule.