To: Texasforever
Well it is a 2+2=4 thing. You see when you argue against tariffs you are in effect arguing in favor of income taxes. Oh No Mr Bill. Yup, in 191x the US passed the 17th amendment to the Constitution and revenue from income taxes started to replace revenue from tariffs. So constitutionally speaking we have two ways to fund government income tax or tariffs, so when one argues against tariffs they are in effect argueing in favor of income taxes. Understand? Yes Mr Bill, thank you for the history lesson.
116 posted on
02/22/2004 10:05:05 PM PST by
jpsb
(Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: jpsb
You see when you argue against tariffs you are in effect arguing in favor of income taxes. I argue against all forms of protectionism, that is why I am a conservative not a populist. See the difference?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson