Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texasforever
Well it is a 2+2=4 thing. You see when you argue against tariffs you are in effect arguing in favor of income taxes. Oh No Mr Bill. Yup, in 191x the US passed the 17th amendment to the Constitution and revenue from income taxes started to replace revenue from tariffs. So constitutionally speaking we have two ways to fund government income tax or tariffs, so when one argues against tariffs they are in effect argueing in favor of income taxes. Understand? Yes Mr Bill, thank you for the history lesson.
116 posted on 02/22/2004 10:05:05 PM PST by jpsb (Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: jpsb
You see when you argue against tariffs you are in effect arguing in favor of income taxes.

I argue against all forms of protectionism, that is why I am a conservative not a populist. See the difference?

119 posted on 02/22/2004 10:07:45 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson