Skip to comments.
Same-sex marriage threatens real marriage
Manchester Union Leader ^
| February 22, 2004
| Bernadette Malone
Posted on 02/22/2004 6:54:58 AM PST by billorites
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 341-352 next last
To: sauropod
Use your CO2 credits on me! I got your credits.
241
posted on
02/22/2004 3:35:02 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: georgette
Why are you posting to me? I haven't posted in this thread...get your threads straight!
242
posted on
02/22/2004 3:41:36 PM PST
by
goresalooza
(Is that enbalming fluid leaking from Lurch's tear ducts or is he just glad to see us?)
To: SJackson
She likes me too!
To: VRWC_minion
It's national troll day.
244
posted on
02/22/2004 3:44:59 PM PST
by
Valin
(America is the land mine between barbarism and civilization.)
To: goresalooza
See reply 244
245
posted on
02/22/2004 3:45:56 PM PST
by
Valin
(America is the land mine between barbarism and civilization.)
To: MizSterious
A fair number of them are likely pedophiles because otherwise a sane person could not, would not, buy into the radical gay agenda.
See post #144, later paragraphs, which outlines how the radicals and pedophiles think a "little" sex is okay for our children!!
Only pedophiles believe that.
246
posted on
02/22/2004 4:14:44 PM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: billorites
Heterosexuals have done more to debase the institution of marriage than any attempt by homosexuals to emulate same. If marriage meant what it used to, then homosexuals would want no part or parcel of it.
They only want it because it's easy and meaningless now. And now can offer monetary benefits to them without the inconvenient injunction to honor one's vows. If they had to maintain a vow, as heterosexuals used to have to, they'd do without the bennies.
Marriage hasn't meant much to many for years upon years now. And you can thank the worthless hets out there who divorced their spouses for myriad 'irreconcilable differences.' The blame for the dissolution of marriage and the family lies with their weak and wretched kind.
247
posted on
02/22/2004 4:22:32 PM PST
by
AlbionGirl
("Ha cambiato occhi per la coda.")
To: georgette
*Zzzzzzzzz.....*
248
posted on
02/22/2004 4:23:56 PM PST
by
Viking2002
(I think; therefore, I Freep............)
Heterosexuals have done more to debase the institution of marriage than any attempt by homosexuals to emulate same. If marriage meant what it used to, then homosexuals would want no part or parcel of it.
They only want it because it's easy and meaningless now. And now can offer monetary benefits to them without the inconvenient injunction to honor one's vows. If they had to maintain a vow, as heterosexuals used to have to, they'd do without the bennies.
Marriage hasn't meant much to many for years upon years now. And you can thank the worthless hets out there who divorced their spouses for myriad 'irreconcilable differences.' The blame for the dissolution of marriage and the family lies with their weak and wretched kind.
249
posted on
02/22/2004 4:24:17 PM PST
by
AlbionGirl
("Ha cambiato occhi per la coda.")
To: catherine miller
Ooooooo, now didn't I get your panties in a bunch?!? LOL
250
posted on
02/22/2004 4:26:07 PM PST
by
Viking2002
(I think; therefore, I Freep............)
To: rintense
She likes me too! Excellent!
From your page, you're a younger woman.
I'm an older guy.
She like's us both, we can graciously describe her as eclectic.
251
posted on
02/22/2004 4:33:29 PM PST
by
SJackson
(Visit http://www.JewPoint.blogspot.com)
To: BigBobber
The primary goal of gay marriage activists is to break down traditional standards for sexuality....Gay marriage is not about hospital visitation rights. It is about cultural approval of their sexual practices. No, it's not. It's about money.
It's about spousal benefits for insurance, retirement, social security, and other entitlement/benefit programs.
Government and society grant certain benefits to married couples because, as stated earlier, most cultures and religions have recognized marriage to be the best method of perpetuating the society. (Even though not all marriages result in children, odds are that many or most will.)
Homosexuality by definition does not perpetuate the society, which is one reason most religions and societies have prohibitions against it. Homosexuals want the benefits married couples get, but they don't benefit society in return.
Actually, I don't believe they would even be able to demand marriage or civil unions if not for the current cultural decline, and the fact that "the joining of one man and one woman and the binding force of the nuclear family" is much weaker than it used to be.
Many couples now choose not to have children. Where I teach, very few of the children live with both parents, and some don't even have fathers listed on their birth certificates. We can't really claim that marriage perpetuates the society, because so many of those who are perpetuating the society aren't remaining married.
252
posted on
02/22/2004 4:39:05 PM PST
by
Amelia
(I have trouble taking some people seriously.)
To: SJackson
I've gotten 5 freepmails from her under 3 names now. And I was not on this thread to begin with. Wasn't it Kerry that mentioned hitting us back on our sites?
253
posted on
02/22/2004 4:40:14 PM PST
by
Ingtar
(Understanding is a three-edged sword : your side, my side, and the truth in between ." -- Kosh)
To: sruleoflaw
But what does gay marriage do to real children??? It doesn't produce them, which is one reason most societies and religions have prohibitions against it.
I've only had one student I know of who was being raised by a homosexual (lesbian) couple, and he was unhappy and rebellious; however, I don't know if that was cause-and-result or if there were other factors involved.
254
posted on
02/22/2004 4:42:12 PM PST
by
Amelia
(I have trouble taking some people seriously.)
To: hellinahandcart
That mass post from zara must have taken some time to write, even with cut and paste. This new form of troll, who seems to have an almost normal attention span is worrying. :)
255
posted on
02/22/2004 4:47:19 PM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Just once I'd like to get by on my looks.)
To: Dog
Who the hell is georgette.. These trolls are nutz!
256
posted on
02/22/2004 5:14:11 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(Lord, If I can't be skinny, please let all my friends be fat.)
To: Elle Bee
A crowd of more than 200 people... Whoopee $hit!
257
posted on
02/22/2004 5:15:50 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(Lord, If I can't be skinny, please let all my friends be fat.)
To: b4its2late; Brad's Gramma; ohioWfan
I just got one from liza minelli......poor liza first her husband dumps her......and now trolls are dissing her.
258
posted on
02/22/2004 5:20:21 PM PST
by
Dog
(Bin Laden your account to America is past due......time to pay up.)
To: Dog
I had one or two from her too. Too bad I can't post what reply I gave her/it...
259
posted on
02/22/2004 5:21:20 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(Lord, If I can't be skinny, please let all my friends be fat.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Ooooooh Ernie --- a special invite just to you. Are all trolls ugly?
260
posted on
02/22/2004 5:22:58 PM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 341-352 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson