This is a bit of a silly story, but it shows that the movement is beginning in New York--through the courts! (Maybe no surprise there). What is interesting is that the movement gays seem to want to have it as an issue, not to seek a result through changing laws.
I want to be sympathetic, but I'm afraid I still don't understand what marriage gives gays--at a practical level--that civil unions don't. Does anybody?
1 posted on
02/22/2004 3:57:53 AM PST by
publius1
To: publius1
This is not about protection this is about destruction.
Do you really think Hillary wants this an issue in New York, as first and foremost? She wants to be president and this issue is not her ticket.
To: publius1
The census counts 46,490 same-sex-partner householdsDid the 2000 census ask for sexual preference? How do they know the difference between a homosexual household and heterosexual college roommates or flight attendants sharing an apartment?
3 posted on
02/22/2004 4:02:24 AM PST by
NautiNurse
(Missing Iraqi botulinum toxin? Look at John Kerry's face)
To: publius1
I still don't understand what marriage gives gays--at a practical level--that civil unions don't.A sense of accomplishment and victory.
4 posted on
02/22/2004 4:03:41 AM PST by
NautiNurse
(Missing Iraqi botulinum toxin? Look at John Kerry's face)
To: publius1
Here is your answer:
New York gays don't believe in marriage, period.
BUMP
7 posted on
02/22/2004 5:26:40 AM PST by
tm22721
(May the UN rest in peace)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
How long until the powers that be in the City of Evil start handing out licenses?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson