Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Did the ADL protest any of this?

From the Catholic League:

Release Date: Sept 20, 2002

Miramax is at it again.

For Immediate Release: Miramax, a film distribution arm of Disney, has a history of antagonizing Catholic audiences with the distribution of movies like "Butcher Boy" and "40 Days and 40 Nights," as well as the notoriously anti-Catholic films: "Priest" and "Dogma."

Now Miramax is at it again. They have chosen to distribute "The Magdalene Sisters." A film by director Peter Mullan that has been described as a "scathing attack" on the Catholic Church, and more specifically, one order of Irish nuns.

The subject of this film is 19th and 20th century religious institutions, derisively know as "Magdalene Laundries." These institutions worked with homeless women and prostitutes, long before modern social programs were developed. Exploiting the fact that by today's standards the conditions of such institution were harsh, the film depicts the Catholic nuns as particularly cruel, heartless women. We wonder what purpose is served by maligning the nuns who selflessly cared for troubled women at a time when society dismissed them as outcasts. The reality that such institutions were run by a variety of denominations, also leads one to question why the ire of the director, and the distributor, is aimed solely at Catholics

Catholic Civil Rights League president Thomas Langan stated:

"Until such time as a film is made depicting the egotistical brothers who co-own a Disney affiliated, anti-Catholic film house, we will join the US Catholic League's boycott of Miramax. We too are petitioning Disney's CEO Michael Eisner to act responsibly and dump this house of film disrepute. Let Miramax distribute what it wants, but not with the backing of the family friendly Disney.

"Disney sees fit to post on its website a 'Code of Conduct' to which its partners must comply. The code clearly offers a 'nondiscrimination' clause and also declares a "respect for the right of all individuals." Miramax however, has seen fit to consistently target Catholics in its films, which is an egregious violation of the Disney Code of Conduct. It is time for Disney to extend and enforce this code over its entire company. Dumping Miramax would fulfill this promise to shareholders."

1 posted on 02/21/2004 7:52:56 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: churchillbuff
Bill Donohoe is kind of the Catholic's version of Ann Coulter...brash, outspoken, often controversial...and he's correct most of the time too.
2 posted on 02/21/2004 7:56:43 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (<a href="http://moveon.org" target="blank">Communist front group</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
With Christians being persecuted today in China and some Muslum countries, why can't we protest against anti-christian messages in movies? Also, the two murderers at Columbine shot at christians - - do you think they might have been influenced by any of Hollywood's anti-christian fare? Eh, Messrs Foxman, Eisner and Weinstein?
3 posted on 02/21/2004 7:57:27 PM PST by churchillbuff (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
bump for later
4 posted on 02/21/2004 8:01:28 PM PST by goodnesswins (If you're Voting Dem/Constitution Party/Libertarian/Not - I guess it's easier than using your brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
...But wouldn’t it have been just as cute to portray the character as a Muslim who gives up sex from sundown to sunset during Ramadan and is tempted during the day?

The spokespersons from CAIR and AIM would go ape over that one. Disney would be forced to put it on the shelf and give a generous donation to a Islamic charity outfit whose funds would be funneled to a terrorist, er, freedom-fighter organization.

7 posted on 02/21/2004 8:42:28 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
I hadn't supported Abe Foxman's campaign against Gibson's movie ... BUT it is clear to me that the Catholic League (source of the lead article) just doesn't get it.

Foxman, et al., didn't criticize Gibson's movie as sacrilege .... heck, I've seen dozens of movies that made light of Jewish religious ceremonies and nobody bitched about that aspect of them .... Gibson's movie is being criticized because of fears it will provoke ethnic hatreds.

Nobody feared that 40 Days - 40 Nights , a rather pointless sex comedy, would do that much damage. And frankly Jewish organizations are hardly the authorities for what is or isn't an acceptably solemn view of Lent.

26 posted on 02/22/2004 3:32:02 AM PST by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
The 40 Days/Nights thing is a bit of a canard and poor comparison to the complaints about "Passion" since "Passion" critics are not upset about the content as much as what it could inspire... blah, blah.

Any two-faced activities on Hollywood's part (financing anti-religous but not religious films perhaps) and specifically any Jewish leaders is more likely attributable to their backgrounds rather than their particular religious faith.

Maybe they should be called Semetic-Americans or something instead of Jews to separate those of the Jewish faith from those simply of the ethnic grouping.
27 posted on 02/22/2004 3:51:23 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Where is Bill Donohoe to condemn the remarks of Hutton Gibson?
33 posted on 02/22/2004 4:47:55 AM PST by veronica ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson