Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Boxer Plans to Confound Republicans
Yahoo News ^ | 2/19/04 | ERICA WERNER

Posted on 02/21/2004 7:00:56 AM PST by Libloather

Sen. Boxer Plans to Confound Republicans
Thu Feb 19, 3:59 AM ET
By ERICA WERNER, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Democrats across the country are fond of saying "anybody but Bush" for president. In the California race for the U.S. Senate, Republicans have a saying of their own: "anybody but Boxer."

She's too liberal, they complain of Sen. Barbara Boxer. She's an extremist, they charge. In the words of California Republican Party Chairman Duf Sundheim, Boxer is "out of synch."

Yet the GOP twice has failed to find that somebody who could defeat Boxer. This time, with Democrat Gray Davis recalled as governor and replaced by Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger, they hope Californians might be more accepting of a Republican challenger.

Boxer has heard it all before, even when she first campaigned for the Senate in 1992. She says she fully expects to confound her opponents again when she asks voters for a third term in November.

"They predicted that they would be able to beat me easily. They kept saying in each of those races that I was an easy one," Boxer said in an interview.

"I just think that the right wing, particularly, in the state, they don't understand what elections are about. They're really about where the people are, what are the values of the people, what are the needs of the people and who's going to fight for the people," she said. "And when all is said and done, they come to the conclusion that I'm there for them."

Competing for the opportunity to vanquish Boxer are four major Republican candidates. Former California Secretary of State Bill Jones is seen as the front-runner for the March 2 primary.

Jones, a Fresno farmer, was the GOP's only statewide officeholder at the time term limits sent him home. He has been endorsed by Schwarzenegger, House Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier, R-Calif., and other party leaders.

Jones ran unsuccessfully for the Republican nomination for governor in 2002, hampered in part by a strained relationship with the Bush administration over his prior support of Arizona Sen. John McCain for president. Dreier and other Jones backers insist that rift has healed.

The other leading candidates are former U.S. Treasurer Rosario Marin, former Los Altos Hills Mayor Toni Casey, and former state Assemblyman Howard Kaloogian.

Marin is campaigning on the argument that a Hispanic woman with moderate social views — including support for abortion rights — offers a new face for the GOP and the best chance against Boxer. A Mexican immigrant who was the highest-ranking Hispanic in the current Bush administration before stepping down, she has never before attempted a statewide run.

Casey has some backing in Silicon Valley but is a virtual unknown elsewhere. Kaloogian, an anti-tax activist who was an early backer of the gubernatorial recall, is appealing to the most conservative of Republicans.

Jones' campaign strategists said they would try to link homeland security and defense to economic security and jobs. They plan to cast Boxer as weak on all counts.

"Security issues are paramount in the public's mind right now ... and when you look at Barbara Boxer it's not simply that she's too liberal, it's that she in her voting record and her public comments is one of the most partisan Democrats in the country," said Sean Walsh, a Jones consultant.

Boxer has a ready response. She notes that she wrote bills to arm pilots and protect commercial aircraft from shoulder-fired missiles and pushed for more air marshals on planes.

"If you were to look at who's one of the leaders on homeland defense, I would be right up there," she said.

Boxer is widely regarded as one of the Senate's most liberal voices — and not just by Republicans. She led fights against the ban on what opponents call partial-birth abortion and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and she voted against the Iraq war resolution and President Bush's $87 billion funding request for Iraq and Afghanistan.

Boxer's stances have won her many allies, but she's never enjoyed the widespread popularity of California's senior senator, Dianne Feinstein, who takes more centrist positions. That makes Boxer's seat the more vulnerable of the two.

"The landscape is changing. We have the president with over 50 percent approval ratings in California. Governor Schwarzenegger is extremely popular. We have an effective Republican organization, which we haven't had in the past," Sundheim said. "All these things — they're different points, but they all add up to something that leads in the direction that we have a realistic shot."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2004; billjones; boxer; cally; confound; electionussenate; kaloogian; rats; republicans; rosariomarin; senator; tonicasey
This story came out the very same day Babs said she does not believe in changing state law to allow for the recognition of same-sex marriage.
1 posted on 02/21/2004 7:01:03 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I'm disappointed, I was hoping Tom McClintock would run against her. Instead, we'll probably get a RINO.
2 posted on 02/21/2004 7:04:19 AM PST by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
A little bias in the headline?

"Boxer Plans to Confound Republicans"

Watch for the Bush headlines in the coming months...

"Bush Tries to Stay Ahead of Opponents"

"Bush Battles for His Political Life"

"President Trying To Save Campaign"
3 posted on 02/21/2004 7:25:21 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek
Instead, we'll probably get a RINO.

I'd take a RINO if the RINO could get elected in CA. If the Senate were less closely divided with a Republican majority, conservative republicans would be in a stronger position.

4 posted on 02/21/2004 7:26:20 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Oh, I agree, however, it is still disheartening.
5 posted on 02/21/2004 7:29:10 AM PST by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: 11th Earl of Mar
"Bush avoids political free fall, for now." - An actual WP headline soon after his election.
7 posted on 02/21/2004 7:49:48 AM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
For the most part you just described Retired Congressman Robert (Bob) Michael of Illinois....In my opinion one of the most do nothing hubris filled Republican MODERATES ever to disgrace the office....Dennis Hastert( Democrats love him)is about worthless.In fact Illinois has some of the most Liberal Republicans of any state other than California.All of them kiss Chicago Mayor Daly's rear every chance they get in the hope of getting reelected to their lie and plunder seats.Will a third party change things?....Yes ,for a short time,until it is taken over by socialists and we will be back to where we are right now....We might as well have a 110% tax rate as we are hammered from cradle to grave to keep these people in a luxurious life style that they deem they are entitled to....American ROYALTY....
8 posted on 02/21/2004 7:52:12 AM PST by Papabear47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar; coloradan
A little bias in the headline?

"Boxer Plans to Confound Republicans"

Watch for the Bush headlines in the coming months...

"Bush Tries to Stay Ahead of Opponents"

"Bush Battles for His Political Life"

"President Trying To Save Campaign"

I noticed that too, and your observation is right on the money.

How come Democrats are never confounded? Their positions are the ones filled with internal contradictions. Their constituency is the one composed of different factions, with separate, contradictory positions (environmentalists want no more oil drilling, unions want more, gay people want full marriage rights, blacks and hispanics want no part of it).

How come Democrats are never fighting for their political life? How come Democrats are never on the defensive?

The answer is easy: because in the minds of the liberals who populate the media, Republicans are always on the defensive, and should be. The fact that media liberals don't see this illustrates their bias. After all, it's called bias because they don't realize it affects them.

(steely)

9 posted on 02/21/2004 8:09:44 AM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"I just think that the right wing, particularly, in the state, they don't understand what elections are about. They're really about where the people are ... Translation: Getting elected as a democrat is all about 'wet-finger-in-the-wind' style leadership ... go in the direction the sqeaking wheels want to go and manipulate/intimidate the moderate majority to shutup and take it. I wonder if the moderate majority will ever awaken to the reality that they are held in vast dnc contempt?
10 posted on 02/21/2004 8:11:38 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
I just read that Rep. Barney Frank will try for Kerry's seante seat in Massachusetts if Kerry wins. I am afraid Barney is in for a surprise.
11 posted on 02/21/2004 8:27:39 AM PST by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oldironsides
I am afraid Barney is in for a surprise.

Not if he backs into the position - eh?

12 posted on 02/21/2004 8:31:48 AM PST by Libloather (Charter member - VRWC - # EIB-04151982)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
Or, how about "Bush landslide smaller than predicted".
13 posted on 02/21/2004 9:15:32 AM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek
"I'm disappointed, I was hoping Tom McClintock would run against her. Instead, we'll probably get a RINO."

Yeah..and another Senate seat and a nail in the rats coffin.

14 posted on 02/21/2004 9:16:46 AM PST by spokeshave (She said one of the men yelled after the retreating burglar: "And that's just our womenfolk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Reason 1: She's an incumbent. The only two way incumbents get unseated is 1) by alienating or neglecting the constituency that they've cultivated during their tenure or 2) angering enough apathetic voters to overwhelm their loyal constituents. Due to the fact that few people follow or understand politics, neither one happens too often. So if you're going to be the next challenger, the odds are simply against you. If you're a Republican, you're more likely to take your chances with the private sector than waste a lot of time and money charging at windmills.

Reason 2: Experienced politicians have a head start on inexperienced politicians, and this includes politicians making the move from the state government to the federal government. California is rather lacking in office-holding Republicans.
15 posted on 02/21/2004 9:25:26 AM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TatooChick; Impeach98
kaloogian ping
16 posted on 02/21/2004 9:57:34 AM PST by calcowgirl (No on Propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Finestein a centrist............riiight.
17 posted on 02/21/2004 9:59:27 AM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Boxer has confounded this Republican for a long time now. Her radical leftist leanings aside, I still have a difficult time understanding how someone that moronic could be a U.S. Senator. .....and then I moved up to Washinton State and found a Senator that makes Boxer appear brilliant by comparison-- Patty Murray.
18 posted on 02/21/2004 10:02:14 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek
"The landscape is changing. We have the president with over 50 percent approval ratings in California"

Can anyone verify this???

As for the RINO statement, youll get a RINO, cuz it is at absolutely best a RINO state. You have to be realistic.

I was on DU one day and they were hoping for Marcy Kapture to beat Voininvich in 2004. Some people just dont get it.
19 posted on 02/21/2004 10:23:02 AM PST by raloxk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Maybe Californians will realize their state is going too far and would like to rejoin the rest of America. Not holding my breath but you never know. I think sometimes radicals go so far they even scare themselves. Hence, Arnold. Can't spell his last name. LOL
20 posted on 02/21/2004 12:21:13 PM PST by beckysueb (Lady Liberty is in danger! Bush/Cheney 04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson