Skip to comments.
Another "NO COMPROMISE" Gun "Group".
H & K brochure
| February 21, 2004
| Shooter 2.5
Posted on 02/21/2004 6:57:13 AM PST by Shooter 2.5
It appears that "no compromising" can get you in trouble. Perhaps positive results should be the goal.
TOPICS: Germany; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: backward; bang; banglist; hk; photograph
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: Shooter 2.5
I see that Sig is out with a slicked-up version of the 1911.
2
posted on
02/21/2004 6:59:05 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(Life Member, NRA. But, you knew that.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Yes, but that's not nearly as interesting as the egregious error in this photograph. You can tell their marketing people aren't gun people, or they would never have let this pic out of the studio!
3
posted on
02/21/2004 7:00:47 AM PST
by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
To: Shooter 2.5
Maybe it's me, but that magazine on the cover looks odd.
4
posted on
02/21/2004 7:01:07 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Just once I'd like to get by on my looks.)
To: *bang_list; Joe Brower; Squantos; Travis McGee
There's a gunshow today and I'm going to see if I can find some of these pamphlets. The ironic thing is most photographers I have met know a thing or two about firearms.
5
posted on
02/21/2004 7:04:47 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Oberon
I noticed the error, too. That's what happens when you let the art department handle guns!
6
posted on
02/21/2004 7:06:45 AM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
To: Tijeras_Slim
It's not you.
And there's nothing wrong with the actual magazine per say.
7
posted on
02/21/2004 7:06:50 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Shooter 2.5
Some folks ARE backwards!
8
posted on
02/21/2004 7:10:00 AM PST
by
litehaus
To: Shooter 2.5
And there's nothing wrong with the actual magazine per say.But it would provide terminal embarassment during a fast reload.
9
posted on
02/21/2004 7:10:23 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Just once I'd like to get by on my looks.)
To: litehaus
I am so embarrassed.....I needed your hint. I just kept looking right past it.
10
posted on
02/21/2004 7:15:44 AM PST
by
SC Swamp Fox
(Aim small, miss small.)
To: Shooter 2.5
Are the bullets loaded backwards in the clip?
11
posted on
02/21/2004 7:17:53 AM PST
by
ikka
To: ikka
"Are the bullets loaded backwards in the clip?" A-yep!
12
posted on
02/21/2004 7:26:11 AM PST
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: ikka
BTW, it's a "magazine", not a "clip".
13
posted on
02/21/2004 7:26:41 AM PST
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: Shooter 2.5
That has to be the most ignorant thing I have ever seen.
If HK paid a dime for that add, they paid 10 cents too much!
14
posted on
02/21/2004 7:30:00 AM PST
by
American_Centurion
(Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime - Nicole Gelinas)
To: American_Centurion
The most common mistake is the reversal of the negative. There was an American Rifleman magazine cover that did that. The designers admitted they did it because the title of the magazine would have covered part of the painting. Oops.
Movie posters are notorious for that. A "Beverly Hills Cop" poster was reversed.
15
posted on
02/21/2004 7:41:56 AM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Joe Brower; Shooter 2.5
BRAWAWAWAWAWAWAWHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH !!!!
Who says old guys ain't sharp ! Well done good eye Shooter !
Stay Safe !
16
posted on
02/21/2004 7:48:17 AM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
To: Shooter 2.5
I don't possibly see how a reversed negative can make the rounds point to the wrong end of the magazine.
Yes, in a reversed negative the entire magazine would orient in a different direction, but the relationship to which way the rounds were loaded to the magazine would remain the same.
Or am I just seeing things?
17
posted on
02/21/2004 7:49:05 AM PST
by
American_Centurion
(Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime - Nicole Gelinas)
To: Shooter 2.5
Reversal of the negative would have reversed everything, it would not look the same as bullets loaded backward in the magazine.
18
posted on
02/21/2004 7:51:34 AM PST
by
RipSawyer
(Mercy on a pore boy lemme have a dollar bill!)
To: Joe Brower
Guns ARE dangerous! lol
19
posted on
02/21/2004 7:51:47 AM PST
by
verity
To: AdamSelene235
Check out the picture. LOL!
20
posted on
02/21/2004 7:52:19 AM PST
by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson