Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Novak Exception Journalists abandon their principles in the Plame kerfuffle.
WSJ.com ^ | 2/20/04 | N/A

Posted on 02/20/2004 3:13:59 PM PST by swilhelm73

Edited on 04/23/2004 12:06:29 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Here's one scoop we never thought we'd live to hear: "Journalists Call on Newsman to Disclose Confidential Sources." To understand this sudden pang of press conscience, it helps to know that the journalist in question is columnist Robert Novak.

At issue is his July 14 column explaining why the Bush Administration would entrust an investigation into the alleged Iraqi attempt to buy uranium yellowcake from Niger to Joe Wilson--a high-ranking National Security Council member from the Clinton years. The answer Mr. Novak reported receiving from Administration sources was that Mr. Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, worked at the CIA and had put her husband forward for the job.


(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cialeak; mediabias; murraywaas; novak; plame; pressbias; waas; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 02/20/2004 3:14:00 PM PST by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
A CIA operative married to an Ambassador is a bad match, and it will unnecessarily raise suspicions about our other diplomats. One of them should have changed careers.

But it's too late now. The damage is done.

2 posted on 02/20/2004 3:37:24 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
Breathtaking hypocrisy, really.
3 posted on 02/20/2004 3:38:47 PM PST by BartMan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
An excellent dissertation on but one example of the breathtaking media hypocrisy.

And just as they knew damn well that it wasn't "Ken Starr" leaking grand jury testimony, yet they pushed and prodded that as a "scandal", they all know it was not somebody in the WH or someone associated with the president or VP who "leaked" Plame's name. But they enjoy creating a mock scandal in order to taint an honorable administration.
4 posted on 02/20/2004 3:43:40 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: HAL9000
The complete damage may not be done.
Agents and assets with whom she worked, and their plans, WERE ENDANGERED by Traitor Novak.

Two government officials told Robert Novak
specifically not to publish the name of undercover CIA operative Valerie Plame
in his July 14 newspaper column.

6 posted on 02/20/2004 3:53:39 PM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
I do not believe Waas for one minute.

I am no huge Novak fan, but he would not lie about that aspect. Plus knowing the intracies of this story it does not ring true at all.

Also note: As the WSJ points out above, it is STILL not clear Plame was "undercover".
7 posted on 02/20/2004 3:53:51 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
I remember posting on that thread pointing out just a few, uh, "flaws", in that story.

8 posted on 02/20/2004 3:54:48 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
"Q.E.D. Robert Novak is a traitor to the USA and its people"

Rubbish. Novak is a patriot and a damn good reporter.

Plame is the one who endangered agents and assets when she tasked her husband with an intelligence mission that he had no business performing. She should be dismissed from the agency for her appalling lack of judgement.

9 posted on 02/20/2004 4:01:14 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
There is a lot of Plame blame to go around.
But a choice was made by Novak AFTER an explicit warning or two.
Bad choice; like Benedict Arnold, late in his career.
10 posted on 02/20/2004 4:05:07 PM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
But a choice was made by Novak AFTER an explicit warning or two.

Wrong. He was NOT given warnings, explicit or implicit.

11 posted on 02/20/2004 4:07:58 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
And you know ... how?
And those who warned him are "liars", why?
12 posted on 02/20/2004 4:09:25 PM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
I know every bit of this story and I have sensibly assessed the credibility of the parties.

Your Waas article is trash, with all due respect. I am mystified why you have glommed onto it. It is an error-ridden piece that strips it of any merit.

13 posted on 02/20/2004 4:12:38 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
And those who warned him are "liars", why?

And let me be clear: Tenet has stated a sub-group in the CIA sent Wilson on their own initiative. It was not at his own behest and it was not done on behalf of the president or VP, who were not even briefed on this tea-sipping sojourn. As I pointed out on the other thread, the former CIA official is clearly Alan Foley, Plame's former boss. They had an agenda for sending her husband to Niger and yes, I say they are liars.

14 posted on 02/20/2004 4:16:08 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
One of Bush's major blunders continues to be his refusals to purge all the people in his administration who were appointed by Willie and the filth of his sewer dwellers. This ambassador was a Willie appointee and is surrouned by the stench of Willie's corruption. Why he was used for any government purpose by the Bush administration is a security breach of the worst kind.
15 posted on 02/20/2004 4:19:23 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
THIS IS NEWS!


"At issue is his July 14 column explaining why the Bush Administration would entrust an investigation into the alleged Iraqi attempt to buy uranium yellowcake from Niger to Joe Wilson--a "high-ranking National Security Council member from the Clinton years."

This is the first time I have read that JOE WILSON was a "high ranking National Security Council member from the Clinton years.

Joe Wilson has always been referred to as former ambassador.

Maybe clintons sent him to gather "INTEL" or JFKerry, since he join his campaign.
16 posted on 02/20/2004 4:30:43 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I am not so sure that this was soley an inside CIA assignment. Considering who JOE WILSON sent his report to -- NYTimes.
17 posted on 02/20/2004 4:39:36 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Indeed...

And don't forget, before the NY Times piece there were articles both here and over in the liberal UK media citing an anonymous "CIA official" putting out the Wilson version of things.

Oh, yes indeedy.
18 posted on 02/20/2004 4:41:17 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
This ambassador was a Willie appointee and is surrouned by the stench of Willie's corruption. Why he was used for any government purpose by the Bush administration is a security breach of the worst kind.

Ack, as I've outlined, he wasn't.

It was done by an anti-Bush sub-group for their own purposes.

19 posted on 02/20/2004 4:42:34 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Joe Wilson was the planner of that infamous African journey Bongo Bill made. Remember that? Couple thousand people went on that jaunt if memory serves.
20 posted on 02/20/2004 4:43:38 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson