To: 2banana
It may be a disconnect but its a win, win for the queers...And the governor doesn't have the balls to tell the CA AG to have the SF mayor arrested...
4 posted on
02/20/2004 12:21:43 PM PST by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITIONS 55-58)
To: kellynla
And the governor doesn't have the balls to tell the CA AG to have the SF mayor arrested... You reveal your ignorance about the California constitution. In CA, the AG is not an appointed position, but an elected constitutional officer. Thus, Lockyer (a Democrat who wants to be governor in 2006), does not work for the governor, and the governor cannot demand that the AG do anything. The only remedies if Lockyer refuses to do his job would be impeachment (not likely with the Dem majorities in both legislative bodies), or another recall election.
To: kellynla
If the City of San Fracisco is going to defy state law why
doesn't the Govenor halt all state monies to the city of
San Francisco until the Mayor complies with the law. This way the Mayor does not become a martyr and the Govenor is helping to alleviate the state budget crisis.
To: kellynla
Lockyer expressed sympathy...That's all we need to know about the State AG. I have no doubt that the vermin are going to get away with it; that the Cal SC will find faggot marriage "legal" and binding. Its the 'binding' part that many of these "couples" are going to rue when they find out how difficult and expensive it is to get a legal divorce in California! Gay Divorce Court - what a circus it will be!
19 posted on
02/20/2004 2:01:11 PM PST by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson