Posted on 02/20/2004 11:46:05 AM PST by ElkGroveDan
At NASA's Thursday JPL briefing on the Mars rovers, the issue of an unusual object in one of the photos from the microscopic imager at the Opportunity landing site was discussed.
On SOL 19, several images taken with the microscopic imager of the soil and the "mars berries" appear to show a hair-like object. Steve Squires with NASA has speculated that the airbags bouncing around that crater may have shed a whole lot of fabric and this could simply be a stray thread. Squires also suggested that as they move away from the bounce-down sites they will continue to look for these objects. He noted that if we continue to see them, well then we'll have to reconsider what we are looking at here.
For your interest, here is one of the pictures that shows a thread (or hair, or root, or beastie). You probably can't see it in this smaller shot, but if you click on the photo it will take you to an even larger image. Look in the upper right hand corner, immediately below the largest pebble in that corner.
Anyone care to speculate? Is this a thread from the airbag fabric? Is it something else?
Yep, if threads broke loose from the air bags, I assume that the winds would scatter them far and wide.
Wacky theory - not threads but some type of hyphae being "unearthed" (unmars-ed??). There's a fungus among us!
I don't buy the airbag theory for several reasons. Occam is not on the side of the airbag.
Some facts to consider: the airbags are incredibly rugged, designed to take a tremendous amount of abuse. Then, consider that even if they did take enough abuse to cause them to shed their materials, you'd likely see tufts, patches, etc., not the occasional thread here and there.
But that's just the logical assumption part of the "occamization of the threads". Let's move on to the observed facts.
They don't look like textile threads. They are of unequal width(diameter). Thinner at the end, thicker in the middle. The only way this would make sense would be if they used organic, rather than synthetic materials to construct the airbags. I rather suspect they used something like Kevlar, not cotton in the construction.
Then there's the fact that they're not even "threads" at all, but fibers.
Go find an old shirt or pair of pants, and work at removing a thread. It's not that easy to remove a single thread from a piece of woven cloth, and when you do, what do you have? You have a thread, made of a series of twisted fibers.
Now, work at removing a single fiber from that thread. Again, not so easy -- and when you do extract it, it's not a nice, straight, smooth fiber. It's kinked, corkscrewed, etc., from being twisted into a thread, which was then woven into a fabric.
I can't think of a scenario that would be on the one hand suffiently brutal to rip the airbags apart so violently as to break the fabric's threads down to their individual component fibers, while on the other hand, leave the fibers in such relatively pristine condition (smooth, straight, unkinked, untwisted, unfrayed, and otherwise unmolested).
The "airbag theory" is flawed on many different levels, with the only thing to support the idea being the fact that the lander had airbags.
Nope, I don't buy it. They look to me like fungal threads. I think it's entirely possible that "the big one" that hit the Yuccatan region may very well have thrown a lot of "stuff" into the sky, some of which may have reached Mars, just as the Mars rocks hit Earth when something hit that planet.
This could also explain the "conch-shell rocks" I've seen in several images so far. (Past Master Councilor pinged because he asked me to provide the pics, which I'll so shortly (a day or two) after I catch up with some "real life" issues. I've gotta dig around a Great Heaping Pile of shortcuts and archived material to locate them. I think I've seen 3,4, maybe 5 of 'em so far.)
I am wondering if there are different algorithms for rendering jpegs.
IMO/IME PS has better resampling/resizing algorithms (it has several options available) than MSPE. "Normal" pics I've resized with MSPE are not nearly as sharp as those I've done via PS.
Any time you do anything other than a straight multiplication of the image (i.e., 2x, 4x, 8x), it's necessary to interpolate the actual pixels, in order to "create" the "missing" pixels. Different algorithms vary in their quality. PS has more elegant resampling/interpolation logic IMO. IIRC, "bicubic" is supposed to give the best results. Also, you may have better results if you resize in smaller increments rather than all at once when making a major change in image size. (And, the closer you can stay to exact multiples of the original (or intermediate) size, the better the final results are likely to be.)
No, not so wacky at all IMO.
I just read your post #42 - I guess I beat ya' by 1. :-)
Somewhere about three or four years ago, I remember reading a speculative article on possibilities of life in a Mars type environment, what we knew of it then, and the suppositions tended toward lichen or fungal life types, if that advanced.
If the thread or fiber is not from the airbag, what is the possibility of other material in the lander apparatus - is there another source of fibers, say insulation materials that might be more likely to shed threads or fibers?
Really good post. I have seen fungal threads that look exactly like that. And they show up in the strangest places (on earth).
Excellent analysis, Don Joe. I do like the fungal theory myself because that's what the Spirit picture looks like. But remember we did see a tuft or a patch (the "rabbit") at the Opportunity site that was variously attributed to fabric or insulation. One press briefing I saw mentioned that Spirit experienced 40g's on it's first bounce. Given how sharp the rocks are, I can believe the airbags were chewed up pretty good during landing.
What I can't buy is the ridiculously super cautious claim that, no matter how far we move away from the landers, any observed "threads" we see are most likely to be from the landers themselves, blown there by Martian breezes. Anybody who says that doesn't know beans about probability. And NASA knows plenty about probability.
But we can bet our bottom dollar there are some people at NASA who are going to be making that argument on the very last day we get the last bit of data from the rovers, and it's silly. I mean, we've known for a long time how to model contaminant dispersal. I did it myself for my master's thesis (not fibers, but groundwater contaminants). And if NASA didn't plan for it, somebody's head needs to roll.
It's funny to me that "Mars" looks just like Northwest Mexico.....
Think about it......
The rover itself may be carrying fibers with it.
Nice, very nice.
Only after I make a shiny, new tin-foil hat.
Nice, very nice.
Fungi spores are quite robust, and, due to their incredible lack of mass, would float gently to the ground rather than burn up during descent. As to being freeze-dried in space before landing, I doubt that would be too much of an issue for at least some spores of some fungi types.
Finally, they are ubiquitous in earth soil. Any impact of sufficient ferocity to send them into space would doubless succeed, since they're everywhere it might have struck.
Since you challenge this relatively common-sense theory, please let me know what type of "thread" that "came frome man made" sources would have the same appearance of a fungal thread (varying taper, not "corkscrewed" due to having been a single fiber twisted into a thread and woven into fabric), and, the process that would present them on the surface where they've been found -- without also leaving more obvious fabric artifacts visible (i.e., tattered threads (made of groups of fibers), torn patches of fabric, etc.)
Ball's in your court. Before you answer, you might want to look at some photomicrographs of various fungal threads, and do some reseach on the durability of fungi spores.
The first question is, if these are actually fungal "somethings" (fruiting bodies or intermediate forms), why don't we see them in other stages too? The answer would likely be (presuming for the moment the theory) the same as why we don't see orange oranges in a grove early in the season, or why we don't see 17 year locusts for years at a stretch.
They could be waiting for the next rainstorm (even if it's never coming), or for some other conditions (unknown) to be just right for them to leave the dormant state.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.