Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

County to issue same-sex marriage licenses (NEW MEXICO TODAY 2/20/04)
AP via News Channel 15 wane.com ^ | 2/20/2004

Posted on 02/20/2004 9:55:00 AM PST by cyncooper

Bernalillo, New Mexico-AP -- A county clerk in New Mexico says it has nothing to do with "politics or morals."

Sandoval County Clerk Victoria Dunlap says the county plans to issue marriage licenses for same-sex couples.

She made the decision after asking for an opinion from the county attorney, who said New Mexico law isn't clear on the issue. He also says refusing to issue marriage licenses to gay couples could open the county to legal action.

State law defines marriage as a civil contract between contracting parties. It doesn't mention gender.

The issue of gay marriage has stirred controversy in other states. San Francisco granted hundreds of same-sex marriage licenses in defiance of California state law.

And lawmakers in Massachusetts expect to resume a debate on a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: anarchy; anarchyinamerica; attackonthefamily; civilizationattacked; civilunion; culturalsuicide; culturewar; democratsagenda; genderneutralsociety; homosexual; homosexualagenda; hysteria; lawlessness; leftsagenda; marriage; marriageunderassault; newmexico; pandorasbox; prisoners; romans1; ruleoflaw; samesexmarriage; spiritualbattle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last
To: Howlin
Bush needs to take a firm stand for a nationwide ban on gay marriage. He needs to explain that these little outbreaks of lawlessness by courts (Mass.) and officials (San Fran. & N.M.) are setting up a judicial showdown which eventually will reach the Supreme Court. He needs to endorse the Federal Marriage Amendment, explain why it is needed, and challenge John Kerry to either endorse "gay marriage" or oppose it. Kerry can't be allowed to say he's against "gay marriage" while at the same time standing in the way of any proposal which would block radical courts and renegade officials from imposing such marriages on all fifty states.
121 posted on 02/20/2004 1:04:37 PM PST by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: dougherty
Another who cries and carries on about Bush "not doing anything" but can't name for us what you expect him to do.

122 posted on 02/20/2004 1:16:45 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
Exactly! If President Bush went on national TV and explained this in plain and firm language, the public would rally around him. All he has to do is say that marriage is an institution which is older than government, which celebrates the uniting of the opposite sexes in a natural bond which is also the ideal for raising children.

Then, he should explain how a few unelected judges and publicity-seeking politicians in aberrant precincts are trying to force gay marriage on the whole nation.

Finally, he should endorse the Federal Marriage Amendment

He has done all of that. And as I keep pointing out, he did it before Massachussetts acted and before San Francisco, and now New Mexico, started issuing licenses.

I know this will not satisfy you as I'm sure unless he follows your precise "script" he will fail you. Too bad for you.

123 posted on 02/20/2004 1:19:53 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping - did I mention the word "deluge" a few days ago?

Let me know if you want on or off this ping list!
124 posted on 02/20/2004 1:27:59 PM PST by little jeremiah (everyone is entitled to their opinion, but everyone isn't entitled to be right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Yes, you did. If the only reason for banning incestuous marriages is because of the possibility of genetical impaired offspring, then what reason is there to ban marriages between brothers, or between a mother and her daughter?
125 posted on 02/20/2004 1:31:27 PM PST by Wordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Look, I'm a Bush supporter. I voted for him in 2000 and will do so again this year.

All I'm saying is that he needs to rally the public. I don't mean a soundbite given to reporters. I mean he needs to do a nationally televised address on this subject alone, and explain the issue thoroughly to the American people. He needs to directly challenge Kerry by name to either put up or shut up. Right now, the press is telling the public that Kerry and Bush have the same position on "gay marriage". Kerry needs to be put in a position where he has to either endorse "gay marriage", or endorse some workable proposal to block "gay marriage". Bush can't let him get away with claiming to oppose "gay marriage" while at the same time blocking efforts to prevent it from being imposed on us.

Bush should follow the Clarence Thomas example, not the usual "stupid party" example of some lip service and lots of inaction.
126 posted on 02/20/2004 1:32:05 PM PST by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
Walker said a marriage certificate from Sandoval County “would give us a lot of rights and benefits that have been denied us as a couple, including the rights associated with property ownership and the rights associated with medical decisions.”

“Look at the sincerity here,” pointing to a pair of women holding hands and exchanging vows, said the Rev. Pearl Gabaldon, who was conducting ceremonies.

County Clerk Victoria Dunlap, a Republican, said Thursday that she knew of no laws prohibiting licenses from being issued for same-sex couples. She said she sought an opinion from her county attorney after she got a call earlier this week from someone asking about same-sex ceremonies.

“This has nothing to do with politics or morals,” she told the Albuquerque Journal. “If there are no legal grounds that say this should be prohibited, I can’t withhold it ... This office won’t say no until shown it’s not permissible.”

She said County Attorney David Mathews told her that New Mexico law is unclear on the issue.

http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~11676~1968558,00.html
127 posted on 02/20/2004 1:36:05 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
"This nation is descending into anarchy. We are going down, and there may be no recovery. "

I am so concerned that our elected officials stand on the sideline and do nothing. As I mentioned in other thread, there is nothing like a cancer that kills from the inside.
128 posted on 02/20/2004 1:36:26 PM PST by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
This nation is descending into anarchy.

The more I read this response, the more I agree with it. The Mayor of San Francisco is treading on dangerous ground. The first real test, however, will be if government agencies provide "marriage" benefits to these people in spite of Gov. Schwarzenegger declaring the licenses effectively toilet paper. If these "married" couples start receiving benefits, then we're in deep trouble. If the governor cannot enforce the laws of the state, then no one can.

It's going to get ugly. If Newsom wants to make this a public showdown with Sacramento, he is underestimating Arnold's willingness to meet him on the field of battle.

129 posted on 02/20/2004 1:45:28 PM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
And the lawlessness spreads....
130 posted on 02/20/2004 1:53:49 PM PST by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: devane617
Wait until these 'couples' that are flocking to SF to get 'married' go back to their home states. They will sue the state in order to get their sham contract recognized.

This a fight of biblical proportions.

And our President can't do anything about it. It is beyond his Constitutional power.

We have to take this fight to the streets. Make your signs, and get the permits to protest.

Let the politicians hear us, and fear for their sorry careers.
131 posted on 02/20/2004 1:54:08 PM PST by ex 98C MI Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: puroresu

132 posted on 02/20/2004 2:02:09 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Santa Fe and Albuquerque are the Massachusetts of the west.
133 posted on 02/20/2004 2:32:26 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tiki
Santa Fe and Albuquerque are the Massachusetts of the west.

But not Tijeras!

134 posted on 02/20/2004 2:33:20 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Just once I'd like to get by on my looks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: tiki
I don't think they're that bad - especially if you consider California part of the "west"! And even if you're only talking mountain west, I'd argue that Phoenix and Tucson and Boulder and maybe even Denver are worse.

Of course, I'm somewhat biased. We do all our shopping in Santa Fe and go to church there, and most of the folks we've met since moving to the area are fairly conservative. The old Catholic influence helps some, I think.

135 posted on 02/20/2004 2:39:23 PM PST by Wordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit
Sorry, but Bernalillo is not Albuquerque.

Bernalillo is in Sandoval County, north of Bernalillo County, where resides Albuquerque. Bernalillo is not in Bernalillo County.
136 posted on 02/20/2004 3:00:36 PM PST by Jerry_M (I can only say that I am a poor sinner, trusting in Christ alone for salvation. -- Gen. Robt E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
Jerry, I was referring to Bernalillo county. Sorry you missed that subtle reference.
137 posted on 02/20/2004 3:09:08 PM PST by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Wordsmith
I would put Boulder above Albuquerque, but not Santa Fe or Taos.
138 posted on 02/20/2004 3:10:05 PM PST by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit
However, it is not the Bernalillo County Clerk who is issuing these licenses.

It is one nut case in Sandoval County, home of "New York West" (Rio Rancho). The vast majority of Albuqerqueans oppose this sham.
139 posted on 02/20/2004 3:12:50 PM PST by Jerry_M (I can only say that I am a poor sinner, trusting in Christ alone for salvation. -- Gen. Robt E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
They seem to think it's time to make the leap on this one, and anyone who disagrees is so very, very deeply evil.

Some may think it's time, but it's not the shakers and movers at the top. Barbara Boxer and Barney Frank, ones who would normally be dependable supporters of these moves, are running like crazy from this. Not that they are at the top, but I'll bet they are getting directives from the top that they don't want this issue to come to a head in a crucial election year.

140 posted on 02/20/2004 3:38:58 PM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson