Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
What you say, though, is profoundly strong evidence that the Shroud is not a purposeful fraud. But it does not prove that it was Christ's shroud.
25 posted on 02/20/2004 10:29:47 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude
You're right. That's just one piece of evidence.

In my opinion, the piece of evidence that is even more compelling than just the location of the nail wounds is the "four-finger" phenomenon on the Shroud. If you look closely at the image, it appears from the configuration of the hands that the person who was wrapped in the Shroud is missing both thumbs.

This in fact is the result of a reflexive action of the human body when one of the three major nerves in the wrist (I believe it is the ulnar nerve) is damaged -- in effect, the thumb is drawn across the palm of the hand in such a way that from the "back" side of the hand it is no longer visible.

Again, this does not "prove" that the Shroud is authentic -- but the notion that someone in the 12th century would have been able to account for this kind of detail borders on preposterous.

33 posted on 02/20/2004 10:38:42 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: AmishDude
It's Christ's Shroud. Believe me on this. I know.
55 posted on 02/20/2004 12:50:26 PM PST by johnb838 (Phoney Medals, Phoney Ribbons, Phoney Political Hack. J. Effing Kerry, Esq., Traitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson