Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dearth Of Information About Christ's Crucifixion Makes It Impossible To Render Accurate Account
WSVN ^

Posted on 02/20/2004 9:37:29 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: johnb838

Flavius Josephus was a Jewish historian who lived circa 37-100 AD.

Christ was crucified around 30 or 33 AD. Josephus wasn't even born yet.
61 posted on 02/20/2004 1:23:32 PM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Remole
...how historically reliable is Gibson's film, especially in matters of detail?

Probably not the snake.
62 posted on 02/20/2004 1:23:55 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
I saw a documentary a while back that presented the following argument against the S of T. If you take a sheet and drape it over your face and leave a print, when the sheet is laid flat the face wouldn't look like a face at all.
63 posted on 02/20/2004 1:26:43 PM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
It's Christ's Shroud. Believe me on this. I know.

Whew! Thanks. It just goes to show: You can't take it with you, even if you manage to come back for it.

64 posted on 02/20/2004 1:29:15 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
If you take a sheet and drape it over your face and leave a print, when the sheet is laid flat the face wouldn't look like a face at all.

Oh, I'll bet if I did that, it would look like Helen Thomas.

65 posted on 02/20/2004 1:30:21 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Or jabba the Hut!
66 posted on 02/20/2004 1:44:47 PM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I saw a bumper sticker the other day that stuck in my mind -- 1 cross, 3 nails, 4 given.
67 posted on 02/20/2004 2:14:32 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic (Re-elect Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jnarcus
Most of which was written almost a thousand years after his death....

If you are referring to the Gospels, the oldest dates to about 70 AD and the other three somewhat after that. It was probably written down as a record of the oral history told by the Apostles and other wittnesses to the Crucifixion. I think 1000 years is exagerating quite a bit.

68 posted on 02/20/2004 2:23:22 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic (Re-elect Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ffusco; Chris Talk
"You are right, term HJ is used to discredit Christian theology"

Then there is also the "Jesus Seminar" Crowd that do pretty much the same. I see them on PBS. And NBC is going to use them tonight on a "special" two-hour Dateline NBC with Stoned Phillips about the "Last Days of Jesus" and ABC with Peter Jennings about the Apostle Paul. Look for the "Jesus Seminar" Biblical scholars (some with their collars) to make Jesus out to be more a political figure or some "cult figure" more than the anointed Son of God.

Also, do a Google on "The Jesus Seminar" to get an idea what this crowd is all about. The liberal media like to use them a lot.

Here are a couple goo sites:

Link to information on the Jesus Seminar

Link to Stand To Reason Org

69 posted on 02/20/2004 2:37:03 PM PST by KriegerGeist ("The weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty though God for pulling down of strongholds")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Geist Krieger; Quix
You are SO right, especially that awful apostate Dominic Crossan, what a louse.

For a real barfer, read his book WHO KILLED JESUS!
70 posted on 02/20/2004 2:45:43 PM PST by Chris Talk (What Earth now is, Mars once was. What Mars now is, Earth will become.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Zias criticized "The Passion of The Christ" for accepting the standard version of three nails being used. He said experiments on cadavers carried out by the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages have shown that people hanging with nails through their hands will fall to the ground within a relatively short time, pulled by gravity.

Not if you nail them through the WRISTS, which was what they did during crucifixions.

71 posted on 02/20/2004 4:37:16 PM PST by MegaSilver (Coulter/Harris 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chris Talk
Thanks for the alert!
72 posted on 02/20/2004 5:27:15 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Read the context of my response. It is in reagrds to Julius Ceasar not the Nazarene. One of the arguments for the historicity of Jesus is in fact that the stories of Him are so close in time to His existence. Julius on the other hand (contrary to a previous poster) is not mentioned by anyone until almost 1000 years after his rule. We do not have the actual books that Julius wrote only reference to them and quotation of them by other authors ( yes even his Gaul)...
73 posted on 02/20/2004 10:58:08 PM PST by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jnarcus
Julius was not mentioned by anyone until almost 1000 years after his death.

Pure BS. The First Citizen of Rome was celebrated for centuries after his death. Also please cite evidence that his writings were in fact not his.
74 posted on 02/21/2004 2:09:54 PM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
I did not say that his writings were not his only that we have them thru secondary sources. I suspect you are not much versed in history to think that Julius is mentioned so early after his death. We have stories from later years of what was said before but not the current reports which you allude to
75 posted on 02/21/2004 10:51:09 PM PST by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: jnarcus
Your premise that Julius was forgotten after his death is completely false.There are 2 months in the calander named after him. His life and times are well documented by his contemporaries and successors. The period where he was forgotten by history was limited to the 500 year period called the dark ages when people also forgot to bathe, read or write.
76 posted on 02/23/2004 8:31:10 AM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
I never said he was forgotten....you have an interesting manner of putting words into my mouth...I shall now cease conversing with you
77 posted on 02/23/2004 11:02:18 PM PST by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson