Replies

I have mentioned law suits several times, I guess you just want to ignore it. Oh well.

I'll try one more time, discrimination against certain married couples would be the basis. And it would certainly work.

33 posted on 02/20/2004 12:43:05 PM PST by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)

I agree that the gay population would file lawsuits, and I agree with your ability to remove HC from the compensation package. I wasn't ignoring that comment. I was however confused by "they" in your statement. I thought you were referring to the government, not to the gay population.

I would prefer to see all benefit packages with flexibility. A normal employee making $50K per year will cost the employer $114. I would prefer to reduce government interference and bennies to end up with more options. I would like to see something like, $65K pay, $10K for the option to spend on bennies or take home, and reduce the government grab to $15K. Employee and employer both win with this type of package.

35 posted on 02/20/2004 12:51:34 PM PST by CSM (My Senator is so stupid he'd have to get naked to count to 21 and my Governor wouldn't be able to!)

I'll try one more time, discrimination against certain married couples would be the basis. And it would certainly work.

Actually, I think the better point is discrimination against unmarried heterosexual couples.