To: CSM
If this "marriage" thing is allowed, I will no longer provide medical insurance to my employees. I would be opening myself up to law suits by fruits who come out of the closet and demand that I pay for insurance for their sexual partners. I would of course refuse, then they would try to get my house.
That is only one area, you can think of many more if you try.
13 posted on
02/20/2004 9:32:52 AM PST by
Protagoras
(When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
To: Protagoras
That is private sector decisions. What does the government provide? You chose not to offer same sex insurance, my employer does offer it. If you have gay employees that aren't happy, they can try to get a job at a company that satisfies them. The bennie packages often cause people to change employment. A gay person has this freedom, as do I.
14 posted on
02/20/2004 9:39:37 AM PST by
CSM
(My Senator is so stupid he'd have to get naked to count to 21 and my Governor wouldn't be able to!)
To: Protagoras
If this "marriage" thing is allowed, I will no longer provide medical insurance to my employees.
Well, if you're in Michigan and purchase through Blue Cross/Blue Shield, it's too late. In fact, they will issue policies (if you, the employer want one) to unmarried same sex couples, but NOT to unmarried opposite sex couples. Talk about discrimination!
39 posted on
02/20/2004 5:05:44 PM PST by
ClintonBeGone
(Hey . . . hey JFK, who's a better comander in chief? GWB or LBJ?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson