[MeekOneGOP]

From the article:

Critics of same-sex unions say those rights can be afforded through other means, and homosexual couples don't need a marriage certificate to validate them.

Genevieve Wood, vice president of the Communications Family Research Council, said that redefining marriage might be a slippery slope.

"There are people out there ... who want to engage in polygamy, they think that's a good family structure. There are others who think that group marriages are a family structure," Wood added.

Yeah, and not ONLY THAT, but what about the other perverts in this country that will claim they have a right to marry their pet aligators, dogs, cats, turtles, snakes, etc., etc., etc. ?? They're out there too, I bet !

[Happy2BMe]

"Yeah, and not ONLY THAT, but what about the other perverts in this country that will claim they have a right to marry their pet aligators, dogs, cats, turtles, snakes, etc., etc., etc. ?? They're out there too, I bet !"

You are on to something here . .

I heard the other day that legalizing gay (mairrage) was not the end objective.

The end objective is to legalize MULTIPLE PARTNERS - READ: MORE THAN ONE LEGAL QUEER PARTNER!