Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/20/2004 7:19:33 AM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Pikamax
Believe I heard last night that the licenses issued this week aren't worth the paper they're written on; hence the lawsuit against the state. Arnold has responded. This will get interesting.
2 posted on 02/20/2004 7:21:27 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
This can't be true -- after all, Arnold is a RINO who will just cave-in. At least that's what I'm supposed to believe based on many comments I read here at FR.
3 posted on 02/20/2004 7:21:42 AM PST by kevkrom (Ask your Congresscritter about his or her stance on HR 25 -- the NRST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Schwarzenegger...chuckle...
4 posted on 02/20/2004 7:21:45 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
While gay "marrages" must be defeated, this means that California is now in play for 55 electoral college votes.
5 posted on 02/20/2004 7:24:32 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
I heard on the radio yesterday that judge who throw out a request to 'cease and desist' because of a misplaced punctuation was Earl Warren's grandson and he was gay.

Is this true?

6 posted on 02/20/2004 7:26:12 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Almost two-thirds of Americans do not think same-sex marriages should be recognized as legally valid, according to a new CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll.

That's nothing new.

But the 1,006 people polled on Monday and Tuesday were almost split over whether individual states or the federal government should determine laws regarding marriages between gays or lesbians.

What does that have to do with the rest of this article? Was that just included so that they could say people are "almost split" over something -- anything?
7 posted on 02/20/2004 7:29:16 AM PST by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Sheesh, I can just visualize this getting appealed to the 9th Circus Court and getting all screwed up by this bunch of clowns.
10 posted on 02/20/2004 7:35:24 AM PST by el_texicano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Gays dont abort children...they just convert them....Arnie is a RINO.....
who must pick his battles carefully and co-ordinate them with Washington....

This is an election year after all...and Cali is important...(to some people that is)

(I do like to see him giving those arrogant sodomites some grief though....he has some goodness in him...no doubt about it)

imo
11 posted on 02/20/2004 7:39:22 AM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
What Mayor Newsom and his buddies are proposing is anarchy. Their arguments apply to legalizing marrying ones small child or pet and polygamy. This would set the stage to destroying marriage and family as can be deduced from the Russian experiment of the late thirties and early forties.

BTW, is Newsom bisexual? His prosecutor wife, a Court TV anchor providing analysis of laws and court procedures, reminds me of a transsexual with her masculine forehead and mouth.

12 posted on 02/20/2004 7:44:06 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax; Barnacle; MeekOneGOP; Salem; Dubya; Geist Krieger
Unlsess something along the lines of a Constitutional Amendment outlawing homosexual (mairrages), these sites will become common throughout a very (perverted) United States of America . . Inside San Francisco's City Hall, a lesbian couple embrace after being married.
Inside San Francisco's City Hall, a lesbian couple embrace after being married.

Schwarzenegger: Same-sex marriages illegal
Same-sex couples in line Thursday to get marriage licenses

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger says the marriage licenses San Francisco is issuing to same-sex couples are illegal. Meanwhile, the city yesterday filed suit against the state challenging the law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

24 posted on 02/20/2004 9:41:28 AM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax

"I left the comforts of Hollywood for This???"

31 posted on 02/20/2004 10:26:35 AM PST by Tall_Texan ((Tagline withheld pending notification of next of kin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
Ping


What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda


Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)

32 posted on 02/20/2004 10:28:17 AM PST by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
"The marriage certificates submitted to the Department of Health Services by the city and county of San Francisco fail to meet legal standards," Schwarzenegger said in a statement on his Web site.


In a related story, lawmakers in Sacramento are proposing a new law that would issue illegal aliens a similar gay marriage certificate that looks strikingly similar to the certificates issued in San Fransisco. Spokeshuman for LatinGLAD, Ben Dover hailed the move as positive, noting the bill will help alleviate the shortage of latino gays. "Assimilating latino gays into the US homosexual community due to the large following of Ricky Martin, Enrique Iglesias, and Charo will be a plus," Rep. R. Ranger (D) stated.
34 posted on 02/20/2004 10:34:11 AM PST by sully777 (Our descendants will be enslaved by political expediency and expenditure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Herrera said the city's case will assert that the state law banning same-sex marriage goes against California's constitution because it violates the equal protection and due process clauses.

The equal protection clause is not intended to provide "equality" among individuals or classes, but only "equal application" of the laws. In other words, if the law says that homosexual men can't marry each, then that law applies to all homosexual men with no exceptions being made for any homosexual men who want to marry each other.

45 posted on 02/20/2004 12:01:31 PM PST by judgeandjury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
gays and lesbians from inside and outside the state hurried to get their relationships validated in the eyes of the law.

Persons protecting themselves by rationalizing are interested not in finding the truth, but in maintaining the illusion that allows them to continue their behavior. For them to succeed in this, everyone must accede to their rationalization. This is why revolutionary change is required. Culture of Vice

46 posted on 02/20/2004 12:05:22 PM PST by tuesday afternoon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Arnold is walking a tightrope - trying to be politically correct and follow the law at the same time. He's going to have be a leader, and follow the law and the will of the people of California, pc zealots be damned.
48 posted on 02/20/2004 12:23:01 PM PST by dougherty (I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free. -Michelangelo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
"The marriage certificates submitted to the Department of Health Services by the city and county of San Francisco fail to meet legal standards," Schwarzenegger said in a statement on his Web site.

So much for the little Tea Party in Frisco. Well, the lucky couples can sell their "marriage" certificates on eBay, and perhaps make back their license fee.

50 posted on 02/20/2004 12:30:18 PM PST by Ronzo (Check out my web site: www.theodicy.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
"We're talking about state inheritance, we're talking about state property issues, we're talking about children's issues, we're talking about power of attorney," Ralph Neas, president of the group People for the American Way, said.

Ever heard of a Will?

54 posted on 02/20/2004 1:25:51 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
"Mayor Newsom took a bold step last week, and we fully agree with him that his position is justified,"


He BROKE the LAW. As Mayor, a function he is explicitly charged with executing is the enforcement of said law. He should be impeached and removed from office.

And if the lavender brigade that runs San Francisco wants to play this game for the next century, Sacramento should also.
58 posted on 02/20/2004 1:41:22 PM PST by ZULU (GOD BLESS SENATOR McCARTHY!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homsosexual Agenda Ping -
Let me know if anyone wants on/off this list.
59 posted on 02/20/2004 1:42:02 PM PST by little jeremiah (everyone is entitled to their opinion, but everyone isn't entitled to be right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson