Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/20/2004 1:08:21 AM PST by Ronzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Coleus
While attention is focused on gay marriages, legal action is threatening Roe v. Wade...
2 posted on 02/20/2004 1:09:55 AM PST by Ronzo (Check out my web site: www.theodicy.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo
Amazing they're even hearing the case... the NOW NAGs and Planned Parenthood pro-choice zealots are having the fax machines humming in overdrive!
3 posted on 02/20/2004 1:11:00 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo
Do you suppose we might get a little clarification of Wm. O. Douglas' principle of "penumbras and emanations" as a valid method of Constitutional interpretation?
4 posted on 02/20/2004 1:16:44 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo
02/20/2004 09:17 AM ID: 37186

1973 Landmark US Abortion Case Appeal To Be Heard
The Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed to listen to the request from "Jane Roe" to reconsider the landmark 1973 Roe versus Wade case which saw abortions become legal.

"Jane Roe", real name Norma McCorvey, is claiming that 30 years of evidence has now accumulated which proves abortions are psychologically harmful to women.

The 1973 Roe versus Wade case decision came after "Roe" gave birth to a third child released for adoption. McCorvey wants the 1973 ruling overturned.
10 posted on 02/20/2004 5:37:25 AM PST by kcvl (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo
BTTT !
14 posted on 02/20/2004 7:15:49 AM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo; american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; CAtholic Family Association; narses; ...
Norma McCorvey, who joined with anti-abortion activists nearly 10 years ago, is seeking to have the decision overturned

Blessings to you in 2004! I pray you and your family had a very joyous and blessed Christmas. Thank you very much for your thoughtful words and prayers these past few months as I begin this new challenge in our fight to tell the world the truth about Roe v. Wade and abortion on demand. Good news has come our way with regard to my recent filing against Roe v. Wade; for more information click here

Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list


17 posted on 02/20/2004 8:42:46 AM PST by NYer (Ad Jesum per Mariam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback
Pro-life ping!
18 posted on 02/20/2004 8:44:19 AM PST by NYer (Ad Jesum per Mariam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo
Here's a thread I started on the baby in Tomball and the Houston Chronicle article on the 5th Circuit hearing. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1082093/posts
21 posted on 02/20/2004 9:32:46 AM PST by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN; Coleus; nickcarraway; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Federal appeals court to hear request to reopen Roe v. Wade

Please let me know if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

P.S. Have you heard about National Christian Voter Registration Sundays ?

22 posted on 02/20/2004 9:54:54 AM PST by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of the Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo
What a waste of time. Why don't conservative mayors around the country just simply outlaw abortion? Isn't that how we do things now in America?
23 posted on 02/20/2004 10:08:06 AM PST by Tricorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo
Thanks for the post ? Why the excerpt? I didn't see it on THIS list.

Anyway, here is the unexcerpted report from The Dallas Morning News so folks can actually read about the story here on FR without having to go off site.


Roe vs. Wade hearing set in March

Appeals court to rule on Dallas woman's request to revisit abortion case

08:57 PM CST on Thursday, February 19, 2004

By MATT STILES / The Dallas Morning News

A federal appeals court in New Orleans will hear arguments next month on whether to grant a Dallas woman's request to have the landmark Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion reconsidered.

The appeal came after U.S. District Judge David Godbey in June rejected an attempt by Norma McCorvey, "Jane Roe" in the 1973 decision, to have her case re-examined.

Ms. McCorvey, 56, now opposes abortion and argues that new evidence shows that the procedure is harmful to women. But the judge ruled that three decades later was too long for a plaintiff to wait before asking for relief from the original judgment – a decision applauded by some legal experts.

After it hears arguments March 2, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals could ask Judge Godbey to consider rehearing the case.

"There's always time for justice to be re-examined by the courts," said Ms. McCorvey's attorney, Allen Parker of San Antonio. Mr. Parker heads the Texas Justice Foundation, an anti-abortion legal group.

Dallas County District Attorney Bill Hill now presides over the office once held by Henry Wade, who defended the old Texas statute outlawing abortion.

Mr. Hill has not responded to Ms. McCorvey's appeal, even though his name is on the docket, because he has decided that, unlike Mr. Wade in the 1970s, his office has no criminal statute to defend because abortion is legal.

"He's not the proper legal party," said Dolena Westergard, a Dallas County assistant district attorney. "It's a strange legal event that he's even named as a party."

On Wednesday, a group of 20 Texas law professors asked the New Orleans appeals court for the chance to argue that Judge Godbey's decision was the correct one. They are likely to hear a reply next week, said David Schenck, a partner at the Hughes & Luce law firm in Dallas who represents the professors.

Mr. Schenck, who once was a law clerk for a 5th Circuit judge, said his group's decision to oppose Ms. McCorvey's effort is based on a concern over judicial process – not over political or moral beliefs regarding abortion.

He said it simply would be improper to start the case over.

"The case to me and the professor is not al all about the merits of this issue. Reasonable people on both sides have different opinions on it," he said. "The issue now, in this case, is whether a litigant who decides that they disagree with the Supreme Court can reverse the decision."

From her Dallas home Thursday, Ms. McCorvey said she is pleased the court will hear her appeal.

Her attorney in the original case 30 years ago, Sarah Weddington, said Thursday that she feels there's no reason to reopen the case. She said the Supreme Court has passed on several opportunities since the 1973 case to reverse itself.

"It's such a mystery that the 5th Circuit would agree to hear it," she said. "This is so out of character. Who knows what they will do?"

E-mail mstiles@dallasnews.com


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/022004dnmetroevshill.58b3e.html

24 posted on 02/20/2004 11:50:11 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (The Democrats believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo
This could be one hell of an election if the 5th Circuit Court Agrees to hear this case.

We could have Gay Marraiges (Fed Marraige Amendment), Roe V Wade, and Constitutional Restoration Act (Religious displays) as the three BIGGEST issues in this election.

This November could be shaping up as the election where America either flushes itself all the way down the drain or stands up and says NO MORE!

26 posted on 02/20/2004 12:00:19 PM PST by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ronzo
Good luck to Norma!
28 posted on 02/20/2004 12:16:03 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah ("We already have a beacon of moral clarity; the Living Magisterium."--Catholicguy 2/19/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Agitate; Alouette; Annie03; aposiopetic; attagirl; axel f; Balto_Boy; ...
ProLife Ping!

If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

33 posted on 02/21/2004 6:37:41 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Pre-empt the third murder attempt-- Pray for Terry Schiavo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson