Don't like the law, change it! :-/
1 posted on
02/19/2004 2:01:22 PM PST by
Simmy2.5
To: Simmy2.5
Time to start arresting people.
2 posted on
02/19/2004 2:02:39 PM PST by
Glenn
(What were you thinking, Al?)
To: Simmy2.5
See, now San Fran should have done this FIRST, and married AFTER (yeah right) the law had been changed.
3 posted on
02/19/2004 2:04:28 PM PST by
Crazieman
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
Time to round up the usual suspects...
![](http://www.lovedungeon.net/gallery/usual/lineup-big.jpg)
Just damn.
If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
4 posted on
02/19/2004 2:05:47 PM PST by
mhking
To: Simmy2.5
Well, looks like Prop 22 is about to go the way of Prop 187. Because the Leftists can't get their way at the ballot box, they once again use the courts as their personal special interest trump card.
But at the heart of it all, I'm left with just one burning question: Why isn't Governor Schwarzenegger upholding state LAW in this matter??
7 posted on
02/19/2004 2:09:15 PM PST by
Prime Choice
(I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
To: Simmy2.5
Now they are going to use CITY funds to sue the state for something that only a small percentage of the the residents want. San Francisco is singing the budget woes, and yet they spend money on this. This suit should be brought by private parties, not the city.
To: Simmy2.5
Herrea appraently is in the pocket of Newsom. This must be another pay off, just as the
slush fund non investigation.
The politics of SF continues to reek.
9 posted on
02/19/2004 2:10:53 PM PST by
Michael.SF.
(We found Saddam faster then Hillary found the Rose Law firms billing records.)
To: Simmy2.5
Well, it's a good thing a real Republican is Governor of CA instead of that liberal-RINO McClintock.
10 posted on
02/19/2004 2:12:45 PM PST by
ServesURight
(FReecerely Yours,)
To: Simmy2.5
Don't like the law, change it! :-/They are. But you mean through the legislature? Naw, why go to so much trouble when you own the judiciary of your state. Heck, Judges there can't even be supportive the Boy Scouts because it might prejudice them against the queers. No question which side will win. And all the legislators can wash their hands of it. It's pretty handy. I just wonder why the legislators are still receiving paychecks now that the judiciary has taken over their job.
11 posted on
02/19/2004 2:14:47 PM PST by
King Black Robe
(With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
To: Simmy2.5; Liz; Howlin; ALOHA RONNIE; RonDog
...same-sex marriages on constitutional grounds.My question - can a married couple, consisting of a man and woman, obtain 'gay' status - along with all the perks of having gay rights? If not, there maybe discrimination - no?
13 posted on
02/19/2004 2:45:07 PM PST by
Libloather
(Charter member - VRWC - # EIB-04151982)
To: little jeremiah
14 posted on
02/19/2004 2:45:44 PM PST by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: Simmy2.5
15 posted on
02/19/2004 3:08:06 PM PST by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda ping.
More bad news from the bad news city. I think San Francisco can be the sister city of evil.
Let me know if you want on/off this ping list.
16 posted on
02/19/2004 5:44:01 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(everyone is entitled to their opinion, but everyone isn't entitled to be right.)
To: Simmy2.5
So nice to see that SF has so much extra money left over after paying its bills that it can afford to file lawsuits against the state.
The mayor and all other officials involved should be thrown in jail over this.
18 posted on
02/20/2004 6:05:46 AM PST by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
To: Simmy2.5
Hmmmmm. A new liberal technique. Break the law, then sue the authority who passed it.
Can we do this with anti-gun laws??
They should burn San Francisco (St. Francis must be turning in his grave) to the ground, fumigate the site, then start all over again.
19 posted on
02/20/2004 6:15:49 AM PST by
ZULU
(GOD BLESS SENATOR McCARTHY!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson