[Coop]

Geez, I actually have more respect for the ambulance chaser after seeing the above transcript. Impressive.

Not that I'll be putting his bumper sticker on my car anytime soon...

[The G Man]

"EDWARDS: I think that we were right to go. I think we were right to go to the United Nations. I think we couldn’t let those who could veto in the Security Council hold us hostage. And I think Saddam Hussein, being gone is good. Good for the American people, good for the security of that region of the world, and good for the Iraqi people. "

Well, for a sleazy trial lawyer, appears you've got some slight degree of honor in you. (He also must know that once the Bush campaign fires their engines up they're gonna steamroll everyone on the Iraq issue)

[The Wizard]

As everyone here knows, pointed out so perfectly by El Rushbo, the democrats need to feed their partners in crime by deciding on a universal term that is then used to create the illusion that there is a common realization among the press of a real problem.....

When this was used in a simpler news world, it looked like everyone came upon the thought innocently and the folks at home were fooled...

The media whores who support this criminal manipulation designed to look like "truth" have been eviserated by the 24 hour news cycle that sees the "word of the year" coming up way to often to be just a coincedence.....it becomes clear that this is an organized ploy of unscruplous people that are willing to do anything to regain the power they've lost

Welcome to credibility

The strongest point in GWB's arsenal is that people believe him and trust him, (unlike the bozo who last occupied the White House) so of course, the democrats see that this must be attacked.....

The problem with gravitas in the past, and credibility now is that it gets driven into the ground by so many different media types and dem politicians, that it becomes clear to the folks at home that this isn't anything more than a campaign message, and it gets ignored becausethey do not like being manipulated.

Then the democrats walk around after the election wondering what happened and why there are now more GOP senators than before.....

Until they get rid of the terry's and the beasts, they are doomed

Just like the jobs lie.....America is changing and the jobs aren't being lost, more and more Americans are moving into the work force as Self Employed, possibily the coolest way to work....the democrats just leave out the fact that by measuring housholds instead of payrolls we are gaining not loosing, and for not making this point LOUDER I blame the RNC, not the crooks on the other side....

Come on Ed...you've started strong, now lets grow a pair and attack the same way.....

And this year's word for the GOP, to be used everywhere, should be LIARS

[joesnuffy]

Hitlery-Edwards what a ticket

[Martin Tell]

Interesting.

Of course Edwards voted against funding the Iraqi occupation, but still he seems to make sense.

Edwards does well among independents and Republicans, even with his class warfare rhetoric. I find his anti-free trade positions troubling for the future of the economy. Still I like the guy, (is it all a lawyer trick?)

I think Edwards will be the next Democrat president (in 2008).

[garylmoore]

They left will use a pound of truth to hide one ounce of lie.

[Adder]

Archived for the responses to "BUSH LIED" charges. [Caps and quotes just don't convey the feigned horror and venom dripping from those words that the users try to portray, da idiots....]

[elli1]

When asked about Gov Schwarzenegger's potential to be a good gov, Edwards replied that he had serious doubts because:

Well, I mean, he-First of all, he has no experience governing....

[demkicker]

I just got this email sent to me & think it's worth posting here for others to cut, paste & send. Spead the truth!

The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor. Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.

Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.

FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.

Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.

John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.

Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.

In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 300 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.

Worst president in history? Come on!

Pass this on and spread the truth!

[Oldeconomybuyer]

bump

[yoe]

"The United States has had a long history of nonintervention..."

...until terrorists, with help from Saddam, flew their hijacked planes into the Twin Towers, declaring war against America - why do people like Matthews, Katie, etc. always leave out the TT's, almost as if it never happened.

As for France, Germany and Russia, they were busy with the "Oil For Food Program" and stood to loose millions if not billions, only Kofi knows for sure.......Those three countries were caught with their hands in the Iraq cookie jar! Don’t ever forget that Kofi was running that little scam.

[VRWC_minion]

We dodged a bullet with Kerry. We owe a lot to Dean for motivating the base.

[Jim Noble]

Edwards response to this line of questioning kicks Kerry's ass.

[ought-six]

Bush would defeat John alQerry. He'd have a much, much harder time defeating Edwards.

[MEG33]

It would have been nice to note the date in your personal post.

[Happy2BMe]

Talk about a "baited" interview. Edwards handled it very well.

[Between the Lines]

Well, the first thing I should say is I take responsibility for my vote.

Responsibility? A Democrat? Backs the president? How is the weather in hell today?

[Just mythoughts]

The smooth talking Edwards most recent take about his vote was he did not know what President Bush knew.

This is what the leaked "memo" gives the road map to. We don't know everything President Bush knows.

That is their big problem, they have itched and whined and moaned all through the Administration about how secret the White House is.

So last year they knew they needed to plant the seeds of President Bush being a "liar" as per the old blowhard Teddy on the Senate floor. Their FEAR is that President Bush has intel they don't know and it might expose some of them in a compromising way.

They must at least get the masses to question President Bush's credibility.

[Constitution Day]

Indexing to Edwards Watch...

[McGruff]

Bookmarking.