Skip to comments.
Hardball:Sen. John Edwards (on Iraq: No. I didn’t get misled)
msnbc ^
| Oct.13 2003
| hardball
Posted on 02/19/2004 3:43:19 AM PST by Eurotwit
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
1
posted on
02/19/2004 3:43:19 AM PST
by
Eurotwit
To: Eurotwit; William McKinley; kattracks
Geez, I actually have more respect for the ambulance chaser after seeing the above transcript. Impressive.
Not that I'll be putting his bumper sticker on my car anytime soon...
2
posted on
02/19/2004 3:47:51 AM PST
by
Coop
("Hero" is the last four-letter word I'd use to describe John Kerry.)
To: Eurotwit
"EDWARDS: I think that we were right to go. I think we were right to go to the United Nations. I think we couldnt let those who could veto in the Security Council hold us hostage. And I think Saddam Hussein, being gone is good. Good for the American people, good for the security of that region of the world, and good for the Iraqi people. "Well, for a sleazy trial lawyer, appears you've got some slight degree of honor in you. (He also must know that once the Bush campaign fires their engines up they're gonna steamroll everyone on the Iraq issue)
3
posted on
02/19/2004 3:48:18 AM PST
by
The G Man
(John Kerry? America just can't afford a 9/10 President in a 9/11 world. Vote Bush-Cheny '04.)
To: Coop
The United States has had a long history of nonintervention, of basically taking the dont tread on me and if you dont well leave you alone. We broke with that tradition for Iraq. What is your standard for breaking with tradition of nonintervention? What is this fat, no-ratings sissy talking about? American non-intervention in the Spanish American War? Mexican War? WWI? WW2? Korea? Nam? Grenada? IraqI? What planet is fatboy living on?
4
posted on
02/19/2004 3:53:25 AM PST
by
Huck
(OK. I'm over it.)
To: All
As everyone here knows, pointed out so perfectly by El Rushbo, the democrats need to feed their partners in crime by deciding on a universal term that is then used to create the illusion that there is a common realization among the press of a real problem.....
When this was used in a simpler news world, it looked like everyone came upon the thought innocently and the folks at home were fooled...
The media whores who support this criminal manipulation designed to look like "truth" have been eviserated by the 24 hour news cycle that sees the "word of the year" coming up way to often to be just a coincedence.....it becomes clear that this is an organized ploy of unscruplous people that are willing to do anything to regain the power they've lost
Welcome to credibility
The strongest point in GWB's arsenal is that people believe him and trust him, (unlike the bozo who last occupied the White House) so of course, the democrats see that this must be attacked.....
The problem with gravitas in the past, and credibility now is that it gets driven into the ground by so many different media types and dem politicians, that it becomes clear to the folks at home that this isn't anything more than a campaign message, and it gets ignored becausethey do not like being manipulated.
Then the democrats walk around after the election wondering what happened and why there are now more GOP senators than before.....
Until they get rid of the terry's and the beasts, they are doomed
Just like the jobs lie.....America is changing and the jobs aren't being lost, more and more Americans are moving into the work force as Self Employed, possibily the coolest way to work....the democrats just leave out the fact that by measuring housholds instead of payrolls we are gaining not loosing, and for not making this point LOUDER I blame the RNC, not the crooks on the other side....
Come on Ed...you've started strong, now lets grow a pair and attack the same way.....
And this year's word for the GOP, to be used everywhere, should be LIARS
5
posted on
02/19/2004 3:58:40 AM PST
by
The Wizard
(democrats are enemies of America)
To: Eurotwit
Hitlery-Edwards what a ticket
6
posted on
02/19/2004 4:00:37 AM PST
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: The Wizard
Wiz ... are you going to spam every thread with that?
7
posted on
02/19/2004 4:06:57 AM PST
by
The G Man
(John Kerry? America just can't afford a 9/10 President in a 9/11 world. Vote Bush-Cheny '04.)
To: All
Someone should lance (Prissy Chrissy) like the festering boil that he is! That boy is infected.
Edweird is just starting his seperation and clarification stage from Lurch. Funny thing, he beat "horse face" in the race to the "middle". I will never trust Edweird. As a "dim" trial lawyer, he would argue that what he said was diametricly opposed to what he actually stated.
LLS
8
posted on
02/19/2004 4:10:28 AM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(We point out Kerry's record and the facts, and they just THINK it's attack politics.)
To: LibLieSlayer
Edwards is licking his chops to repeal the tax cuts. He thinks he is going to get 1/3 of such repeal and expenses.
To: Coop
I did too when he stood up for his vote and going to Iraq.
He then he started trashing the character of George Bush.He said despicable things.I like him less,now.I could not finish it.
10
posted on
02/19/2004 4:12:29 AM PST
by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: Eurotwit
Interesting.
Of course Edwards voted against funding the Iraqi occupation, but still he seems to make sense.
Edwards does well among independents and Republicans, even with his class warfare rhetoric. I find his anti-free trade positions troubling for the future of the economy. Still I like the guy, (is it all a lawyer trick?)
I think Edwards will be the next Democrat president (in 2008).
11
posted on
02/19/2004 4:12:37 AM PST
by
Martin Tell
(I will not be terrified or Kerrified.)
To: The G Man
I posted it as a warning to the folks and someone moved it off the topic, what am I supposed to do when a moderator doesn't like me
12
posted on
02/19/2004 4:20:28 AM PST
by
The Wizard
(democrats are enemies of America)
To: Eurotwit
They left will use a pound of truth to hide one ounce of lie.
13
posted on
02/19/2004 4:20:30 AM PST
by
garylmoore
(It is as it was)
To: Martin Tell
You will not think that after President Bush's campaign "educates" you on his past. He has been involved in some cases (where he profited greatly at the expense of those he pretends to represent), and when these and other sheister facts come out, his "glow" will be hugely deminished.
LLS
14
posted on
02/19/2004 4:21:13 AM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(We point out Kerry's record and the facts, and they just THINK it's attack politics.)
To: The Wizard
More people trust Kerry than Bush.
15
posted on
02/19/2004 4:23:05 AM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
("You can dip a pecan in gold, but it's still a pecan"-- Deep Thoughts by JC Watts)
To: Coop
MATTHEWS: Were you misled by the president in the State of the Union address on the argument that Saddam Hussein was trying get uranium from NigerHere we go again, the president did not say Niger in the State of the Union address
16
posted on
02/19/2004 4:23:28 AM PST
by
mware
To: Coop
Except for the fact that he didn't have the balls to say this when Dean was in the race, and the fact that he flat out lies about there not being a coalition in Iraq (tell that to the Poles who just died, tell that to the Brits, tell that to the Aussies).
The fun part of this is what he is doing now is trying to draw some differences between himself and Kerry to see if he can steal the nomination-- and if he gets that traction, you will see Kerry start to adopt the same positions to remove the distinctions. So we are likely to see Kerry twisting himself into inconsistency again.
To: GraniteStateConservative
Not a chance.
18
posted on
02/19/2004 4:24:46 AM PST
by
Coop
("Hero" is the last four-letter word I'd use to describe John Kerry)
To: GraniteStateConservative
no one trusts Kerry
19
posted on
02/19/2004 4:25:09 AM PST
by
The Wizard
(democrats are enemies of America)
To: Eurotwit
Archived for the responses to "BUSH LIED" charges. [Caps and quotes just don't convey the feigned horror and venom dripping from those words that the users try to portray, da idiots....]
20
posted on
02/19/2004 4:26:05 AM PST
by
Adder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson