Skip to comments.
FEC restricts use of 'soft money'
Washington Times ^
| 2/19/04
| Steve Miller
Posted on 02/18/2004 10:08:05 PM PST by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:13:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The Federal Election Commission yesterday voted 4-2 to place restrictions on political advocacy groups with no expressed party affiliation that use "soft money" to influence elections.
At the same time, the six-member commission delayed a decision on a campaign-finance law that prohibits money from big businesses and unions from going to tax-exempt groups that are connected to political parties.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaignfinance; fec; softmoney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
02/18/2004 10:08:05 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
The Republican chairman of the commission, Bradley Smith, chastised his party yesterday for pushing for a prohibition of soft money after blocking campaign-finance reform efforts for years. "It is not our place to measure the law in partisanship," said Mr. Smith, who was nominated to his post in 2000 by President Clinton. "Frankly, I'm disappointed that my party seems to be afraid to combat this campaign on ideas. If they think they can win by silencing their opponents, I think they are going to lose," he said. What kind of a Republican gets nominated by Bill Clinton?
Thanks for posting this Kattracks! You're a credit to this site!
Regards,
TS
2
posted on
02/18/2004 10:13:57 PM PST
by
The Shrew
(Radio FreeRepublic - The New NPR)
To: kattracks
So does this mean no more kids in a sweatshop from Moveon.org?
3
posted on
02/18/2004 10:15:41 PM PST
by
Moosehead
To: kattracks
Be careful what you ask for: you may get it.
4
posted on
02/18/2004 10:17:08 PM PST
by
sourcery
(This is your country. This is your country under socialism. Any questions? Just say no to Socialism!)
To: kattracks
bump
To: kattracks
"Today's ruling effectively shuts down illicit 527 groups that operate in the shadows by using unregulated soft money to influence federal elections," said Ed Gillespie, Republican National Committee Chairman
This won't make the left happy.
6
posted on
02/18/2004 10:19:42 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com..............................send a FReeper to Congress!)
To: kattracks
That recommendation was denounced by supporters of Democrats, particularly a coalition of 324 special-interest and advocacy groups
Yes!!!!
7
posted on
02/18/2004 10:20:13 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com..............................send a FReeper to Congress!)
To: kattracks; The Shrew
The coalition, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People's National Voter Fund, Planned Parenthood, the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Organization for Women Legal Defense and Education Fund, sent commissioners a letter saying that any restrictions "would entirely shut down many of the advocacy activities of our organizations."
I have trouble accepting unelected bodies making laws, but this doesn't seem so bad =o)
This should be in FRONT PAGE NEWS!!!
8
posted on
02/18/2004 10:21:16 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com..............................send a FReeper to Congress!)
To: The Shrew
What kind of a Republican gets nominated by Bill Clinton?Sort of like Bill Cohen at DOD.
To: The Shrew; GeronL
10
posted on
02/18/2004 10:22:48 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: GeronL
Hillary is not going to be happy that her group of Hollywood liberals can't contribute to defeating President Bush, especially Soros. ROFLOL!
11
posted on
02/18/2004 10:23:17 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: kattracks
Today's ruling effectively shuts down illicit 527 groups that operate in the shadows by using unregulated soft money to influence federal elections," said Ed Gillespie, Republican National Committee Chairman. I wonder if there is a list of these 527 groups out there some where.
12
posted on
02/18/2004 10:26:18 PM PST
by
NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
(Michael <a href = "http://www.michaelmoore.com/" title="Miserable Failure">"Miserable Failure"</a>)
To: kcvl
Look at my #10........remember him?????
13
posted on
02/18/2004 10:27:36 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: kcvl; kattracks
No doubt there would be Ketchup/Heinz Foundation "Charitable" money in 527 groups too.
14
posted on
02/18/2004 10:27:46 PM PST
by
NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
(Michael <a href = "http://www.michaelmoore.com/" title="Miserable Failure">"Miserable Failure"</a>)
To: GeronL
URGENT ACTION NEEDED: Oppose the Nomination of BRADLEY SMITH to FEC
March 3, 2000
Dear Senator,
On Wednesday, March 8, the Senate Rules Committee will conduct hearings regarding the nomination of Professor Bradley A. Smith to serve as a Commissioner to the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
As the Brennan Center for Justice said when this nomination was originally offered by the Republicans in 1999, Brad Smith is a wholly inappropriate choice to serve as a Commissioner to the FEC.
The enclosed memo, prepared by the Brennan Center, outlines the facts about Smith and his self-described "radical" position on campaign finance laws and their enforcement.
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed Smith neatly summed up his feelings about the nation's federal campaign laws: "The most sensible reform is a simple one: repeal of the Federal Election Campaign Act."
An FEC Commissioner is called upon to uphold, administer, and enforce the nation's campaign finance laws and regulations. Smith, however, has consistently voiced his strong disagreement with the mission of the FEC and the election laws that he would be called upon to enforce as a Commissioner. Indeed, Smith does not disagree with only a few aspects of current campaign finance law; rather he believes that the entire federal campaign finance scheme is fundamentally flawed and unworkable.
As The New York Times wrote in a July 13, 1999 editorial: "Mr. Smith's writings make plain that his agenda as a commission member would be a further dismantling of reasonable campaign limits intended to curb the corrupting influence of big money rather than serious enforcement of current campaign finance laws."
While FEC Commissioners must administer and enforce the nation's campaign finance laws, Smith has a long, documented history of vigorously opposing them. A decision to appoint Smith as an FEC Commissioner would be tantamount to voting to repeal the Federal Election Campaign Act.
In short, Smith would be a disastrous FEC Commissioner. The Brennan Center for Justice strongly urges you to reject the nomination of Bradley A. Smith to the Federal Election Commission.
Sincerely,
E. Joshua Rosenkranz
President
Brennan Center for Justice At NYU School of Law
15
posted on
02/18/2004 10:28:43 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Mr. Smith is a sensible guy.
There should be no limits or rules about who you give your money to in the election process.
But it should all be PUBLIC INFORMATION.
16
posted on
02/18/2004 10:33:46 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com..............................send a FReeper to Congress!)
To: Howlin
Oh man! Thanks for the reminder!
Regards,
TS
17
posted on
02/18/2004 10:34:46 PM PST
by
The Shrew
(Radio FreeRepublic - The New NPR)
To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
The coalition, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People's National Voter Fund, Planned Parenthood, the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Organization for Women Legal Defense and Education Fund, sent commissioners a letter saying that any restrictions "would entirely shut down many of the advocacy activities of our organizations." That would be these TYPES of groups.
18
posted on
02/18/2004 10:35:07 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com..............................send a FReeper to Congress!)
To: GeronL
It may not survive the constitutional scrutiny it is sure to get because it sets up the FEC to pick and choose among causes.
19
posted on
02/18/2004 10:36:46 PM PST
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
"No doubt there would be Ketchup/Heinz Foundation..." Oooh yes indeed!
Teresa Heinz Kerry: Bag Lady for the Radical Left
By Ben Johnson
FrontPageMagazine.com | February 13, 2004
20
posted on
02/18/2004 10:40:07 PM PST
by
yoe
(WMD come in small containers/vials...small minds don't want you to know that.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson