Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RIAA sued for extortion and racketeering
CNET ^ | 2/18/2004 | John Borland

Posted on 02/18/2004 7:51:27 PM PST by plain talk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 02/18/2004 7:51:28 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: plain talk
About time a backlash on RIAA occurred. Hooray!
2 posted on 02/18/2004 7:59:58 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Anyone know how to get in touch with Mr. Lombardo? I smell a class-action.
3 posted on 02/18/2004 8:07:53 PM PST by Houmatt (Justice For Carlie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Yes, information please.
My IP sold me out to the RIAA months ago.
4 posted on 02/18/2004 8:09:53 PM PST by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Backlash? One case? ....more like twenty lashes with a wet noodle. Seems to me that some of these perps want to change the subject.
5 posted on 02/18/2004 8:13:18 PM PST by Banjoguy (Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
The lawsuit will fail. It's an idiotic concept. But of course that's never stopped people from filing lawsuits before.
6 posted on 02/18/2004 8:16:47 PM PST by flashbunny (Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
The lawsuit will fail. It's an idiotic concept.

Are you a lawyer? Or do you just play one on FreeRepublic?

7 posted on 02/18/2004 8:29:52 PM PST by ProudGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
Your probably right, but as long as it keeps the goons at RIAA busy enough to stop them from molesting more 12 year olds then its all good :)

Maybe it'll even give them some time to think about their blatant price gouging, well and pigs may fly too :/
8 posted on 02/18/2004 8:31:24 PM PST by battousai (Coming Soon to an election near you: Pasty White Hillary and the Nine umm Three? Dwarfs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy
What subject might that be? Downloading songs off of the internet for personal use?
9 posted on 02/18/2004 8:56:42 PM PST by Houmatt (Justice For Carlie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
The lawsuit will fail. It's an idiotic concept. But of course that's never stopped people from filing lawsuits before.

Frivolous lawsuits are a dime a dozen..(so to speak). Coffee spills, trips in Walmart, and the like.

I think being sold out by a company that you pay your hard earned money to is worth some hard fought litigation. Isn't that what "civil liberty" is all about? Or does that only apply to liberal causes?

10 posted on 02/18/2004 9:04:03 PM PST by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LisaMalia
Which company sold you out? I am curious.
11 posted on 02/18/2004 9:08:54 PM PST by Houmatt (Justice For Carlie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
My internet provider....:)
12 posted on 02/18/2004 9:20:32 PM PST by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
The lawsuit will fail. It's an idiotic concept. But of course that's never stopped people from filing lawsuits before.

That depends, the RIAA has already been found guilty in a court of law for price fixing.

13 posted on 02/18/2004 9:43:46 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
BTTT!!
14 posted on 02/18/2004 10:20:30 PM PST by Lael (Patent Law...not a single Supreme Court Justice is qualified to take the PTO Bar Exam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Bart Lombardo
15 posted on 02/18/2004 10:35:25 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace (Michael <a href = "http://www.michaelmoore.com/" title="Miserable Failure">"Miserable Failure"</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Technically they were not found guilty. They agreed to give states and the lawyers and out of court settlement into the millions. The consumers were "promised" a check (if they didn't get a whole lot of responses to the offer for a free check, no questions asked). Consumers didn't get a check.

Since it was an out of court settlement, they were not found guilty in a court of law of price fixing. We all know they did.

16 posted on 02/18/2004 11:08:27 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: weegee
I heard different, that they lost the case.

But anyway, the RIAA is guilty of so much more than what is listed in this lawsuit.

17 posted on 02/19/2004 7:12:33 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ProudGOP
Are you a lawyer? Or do you just play one on FreeRepublic?

I am and I've actually gone to trial on several Civil RICO suits over the last 15 years. The case doesn't stand a chance unless they can show that RIAA has engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, which typically requires one or more schemes to commit fraud supported by at least two predicate acts (i.e. mail and/or wire fraud) commited within the previous ten years, that would have continued indefinately if the scheme had not been uncovered. I don't see the fraud or the predicate acts that are absolutely necessary under the RICO Act for simply suing people for stealing music in violation of the Copyright Laws and then offering to settle with them for a fraction of what they could be liable for if their cases went to trial.

18 posted on 02/19/2004 7:31:44 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
1) Downloading a song for your personal use is not a violation of copyright laws.

2) The RIAA has demanded internet service providers turn over their membership rolls for the sole purpose of filing lawsuits against people who are not doing anything wrong.

3) The people sued by and large are not in a position to fight back from a lawsuit of this kind and so they are forced to settle out of court, and the RIAA knows it.

Are you familiar with the grandmother that was sued in the first round of lawsuits? The RIAA insisted on suing her even though she did not even own a personal computer. They were forced to drop the suit but strongly hinted they might refile it in the future. And you are telling me this is not extortion tactics?

Sorry, but you are dead wrong on this one.

19 posted on 02/19/2004 9:16:35 AM PST by Houmatt (Justice For Carlie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
This is where you can find contact information on Mr. Lombardo.

I wonder if you have to put up any money to make it a class action lawsuit....?

20 posted on 02/19/2004 9:24:34 AM PST by Houmatt (Justice For Carlie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson