And we already know the results of what will happen if they even tried.
His whole argument boils down to I don't understand (He uses the word "Vague" in that article over and over) the evolution of the Flagellum so it must be designed.
Scientifically it would be shot down because the flagellum didn't evolve from the TTSS system instead they have a common ancestor so his methodology is flawed right at the onset.
Your post should be peer-reviewed, Miller’s article should be peer-reviewed, and Begley’s article should be in a peer-reviewed journal (unless the Wall Street Journal counts). I will try to submit this post for peer reviewing so we might discuss it…
All post here are peer reviewed, In this case our peers are fellow freepers and the moderators.
In the interim… Refereed Journals: Do They Insure Quality or Enforce Orthodoxy? -Frank J. Tipler
Oh boo hoo, The ol' I'm a victim of a conspiracy card
I see ‘might have’ and ‘could have’ in peer-reviewed articles all the time. His argument is not ‘I don’t understand’ but I do understand this is not a result of stupidity. Furthermore, ironically the term ‘vague’ in Mike Gene’s article is used in reference to the peer-reviewed articles he referenced.