Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tactics Changing for Both Coalition Forces, Terrorists in Afghanistan
American Forces Press Service ^ | Feb. 17, 2004 | By Kathleen T. Rhem

Posted on 02/17/2004 10:48:30 AM PST by Calpernia

U.S. and coalition actions in Afghanistan have forced terrorist groups operating there to change their strategies. So coalition forces continue to adapt their tactical approach in response, the top U.S. general in that country said today.

Army Lt. Gen. David Barno, commander of Combined Forces Command Afghanistan, explained that Taliban forces used to attack coalition elements in large numbers, until they realized that would get them killed in large numbers. Today terrorists go after soft targets in smaller numbers, Barno said from Afghanistan in a video teleconference with Pentagon reporters.

He said he sees enemy forces "adapting and changing (their) tactics, based upon the progress the Afghan people and government have made."

Barno pointed out that "last summer we would encounter hundreds of Taliban in the field and other terrorists in large groups." He called that contact "a non- habit-forming way to encounter coalition forces."

"They were destroyed in large numbers. So they have adapted their tactics, based on that," he said.

Taliban and al Qaeda terrorists operating in Afghanistan have realized they can't effectively attack coalition military forces, so they have started to focus their attacks on other areas, such as nongovernmental aid organizations.

To combat this change in tactics, coalition forces are moving toward "a classic counterinsurgency strategy," Barno said. Over the past three months, commanders have been sending small units, from battalions down to platoons, into areas for long-term stays.

These units "operate continuously out of those areas; maintain and develop relations with the tribal elders, with the mullahs, with the local government officials; (and) work hand in hand with the (coalition provincial reconstruction teams) that are now going into those areas," Barno said. "And the units then ultimately get great depth of knowledge, understanding and much better intelligence access to the local people in those areas by 'owning,' as it were, those chunks of territory."

The general called this "a fairly significant change" in the tactical approach and said it has resulted in more weapons caches turned in by local civilians.

Better cooperation with Pakistani forces is also leading to increased security in Afghanistan. In what Barno described as "a hammer-and-anvil approach," Pakistani military and paramilitary troops drive terrorist forces out of Pakistani frontier lands and over the Afghan border – where coalition and Afghan national military forces are waiting for them.

"(We're using) our forces in concert with the Afghan forces on this side of the border to be able to … crush the al Qaeda elements between the Pakistani and the coalition forces," he said.

Pakistani forces are also taking major steps to rein in lawlessness in tribal areas along Pakistan's border with Afghanistan. Barno said the Pakistani government had not previously sought control in these frontier lands, which are widely believed to harbor terrorists and their supporters.

During the past six to eight weeks, Pakistani government forces have been using "innovative" means to enlist the help of tribal leaders to "uncover and disrupt terrorist organizations that may be living and operating in their midst," Barno said.

He said that ultimate responsibility for driving the terrorists out of Pakistan's border regions lies with the Pakistani government, and he expressed optimism that it would happen.

"The efforts that I see that have evolved with the Pakistani military here over the last two or three months show the greatest promise we have seen in a while of ensuring that those al Qaeda forces in those areas are driven out," he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; coalition; ltgenbarno; southasia; taliban; terroristgroups

1 posted on 02/17/2004 10:48:33 AM PST by Calpernia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; Jessamine; ...
Pro Military, Pro Coalition News!

Taliban and al Qaeda terrorists operating in Afghanistan have realized they can't effectively attack coalition military forces, so they have started to focus their attacks on other areas, such as nongovernmental aid organizations.

Private Mail to be added to or removed from the GNFI (or Pro-Coalition) ping list.

2 posted on 02/17/2004 10:53:45 AM PST by Calpernia (http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Innovative means works for me. Whatever it takes.
3 posted on 02/17/2004 10:55:58 AM PST by Thebaddog (Woof this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Dog
Calpernia,

Thanks for the post. This is confirmation of what some have been seeing alluded to in other articles.

4 posted on 02/17/2004 11:00:19 AM PST by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
To combat this change in tactics, coalition forces are moving toward "a classic counterinsurgency strategy," Barno said. Over the past three months, commanders have been sending small units, from battalions down to platoons, into areas for long-term stays.

These units "operate continuously out of those areas; maintain and develop relations with the tribal elders, with the mullahs, with the local government officials; (and) work hand in hand with the (coalition provincial reconstruction teams) that are now going into those areas," Barno said. "And the units then ultimately get great depth of knowledge, understanding and much better intelligence access to the local people in those areas by 'owning,' as it were, those chunks of territory."

This is a text book Special Forces mission...

5 posted on 02/17/2004 11:01:25 AM PST by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
I heard a guy promoting a book. Said he was, ahem, a merc in Afghanistan. Anyway, one story was the Taliban's adherence
to flooding in to a new bomb crater for cover. Not living in the 21st century was hazardous for them, as spotters
resent the GPSS coordinates to the next load of JDAMS.
6 posted on 02/17/2004 11:05:54 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
We are winning ~ the bad guys are losing ~ al-Qaeda and the democrats are sad ~ very sad!

~~ Bush/Cheney 2004 ~~
>
7 posted on 02/17/2004 11:08:10 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; armymarinemom; Khurkris; CheneyChick
Army Lt. Gen. David Barno, commander of Combined Forces Command Afghanistan, explained that Taliban forces used to attack coalition elements in large numbers, until they realized that would get them killed in large numbers.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hoo ah!

8 posted on 02/17/2004 11:59:47 AM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl ("(We)..come to rout out tyranny from its nest. Confusion to the enemy." - B. Taylor, US Marine, 2/28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
One of the ideological changes I have hoped would come out of this campaign against terrorists is the left's hypocrisy in blaming the US/West for the actions of terrorists.

The NGOs blame the US for creating the terrorists by blaming us for the "conditions" in the terrorist's propaganda. When in truth, the terrorists create and worsen those conditions, then pass off the blame, in order to radicalize and control their populations.

The NGOs blame the US for not protecting the victims of terrorists rather than the terrorists for committing the acts.

The NGOs blame the US for not protecting NGOs from the terrorists while refusing US security so they can maintain an appearance of independence and leftist/populist purity.

At some point, the left and their multilateralist/internationalist organizations are going to have to identify these violent radicals as violators of their beloved Geneva Conventions and Protocols and come down hard on those that target civilians and civil institutions.

The problem for them is, radicalism and terroristic guerilla warfare have been at the heart of their Marxist revolution ideology. Coming down hard on terrorism could endanger the anticipated revolt.

But for someone optimistically conservative about the world we live in, I can only keep hope alive.
9 posted on 02/17/2004 12:04:14 PM PST by optimistically_conservative (This tagline recently seen at Taglinus FreeRepublicus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl; armymarinedad

10 posted on 02/17/2004 12:19:34 PM PST by armymarinemom (The family reunion is moving to Iran this year-Central location and a shorter trip for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
Well said!

Bump!
11 posted on 02/17/2004 12:52:00 PM PST by Calpernia (http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Bump!
12 posted on 02/17/2004 8:06:29 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; general_re; BlueLancer; Poohbah; hellinahandcart
Barno pointed out that "last summer we would encounter hundreds of Taliban in the field and other terrorists in large groups." He called that contact "a non- habit-forming way to encounter coalition forces."
13 posted on 02/17/2004 8:10:44 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton; general_re; BlueLancer; Poohbah; hellinahandcart
Good news bump.

More here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1079235/posts

14 posted on 02/17/2004 8:19:33 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dighton; aculeus; Poohbah; BlueLancer; hellinahandcart; Thinkin' Gal
During the past six to eight weeks, Pakistani government forces have been using "innovative" means to enlist the help of tribal leaders....

"We're gonna make him an offer he can't refuse..."

15 posted on 02/17/2004 8:25:11 PM PST by general_re (Remember that what's inside of you doesn't matter because nobody can see it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson