To: archy; Solson
Well, then I can't see how she ALSO gave an interview about her "affair" to a US tv network.
5 posted on
02/16/2004 10:20:13 AM PST by
summer
To: Chris Talk; GeronL
FYI.
12 posted on
02/16/2004 10:21:40 AM PST by
summer
To: summer
Well, then I can't see how she ALSO gave an interview about her "affair" to a US tv network. Considering how this story was spiked their response will be: "Interview? What interview? (meanwhile, ripping ribbon from cassette and into trash)"
17 posted on
02/16/2004 10:22:29 AM PST by
smith288
(http://www.ejsmithweb.com/FR/JohnKerry/)
To: summer
Something isn't right here. A denial from one standpoint and a supposed "interview" and quotes from "friends" that looked very similar to Propertius' comments on this site.
Inquiring minds...
30 posted on
02/16/2004 10:26:12 AM PST by
Solson
(Our work is the presentation of our capabilities. - Von Goethe)
To: summer
What are the chances of that unedited interview surfacing? Ha.
93 posted on
02/16/2004 10:45:54 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(This space intentionally blank)
To: summer
"Well, then I can't see how she ALSO gave an interview about her "affair" to a US tv network.
"
Probably never happened. That was a "report" in the UK media that such an interview had happened. There has been no confirming information. This story has the potential to embarrass conservatives, and deserves to be simply dropped.
119 posted on
02/16/2004 10:54:58 AM PST by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: summer
Well, that interview will never see the light of day. It'd be interesting if the cameraman sold a copy of the tape to The Enquirer, but of course, Lovie will buy everyone off.
267 posted on
02/16/2004 11:43:17 AM PST by
hershey
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson