Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: schaketo
A friend of mine emailed me this some time ago. I've posted it several times because it profiles the central flaw in the reparations movement.


While travelling to work the other day, I happened to catch Michael Medved's talk show with some woman who is the head of one those groups demanding reparation for Africans in America due to slavery. Of course I'd heard of this before and had already decided it was ok by me as long as it was done fairly. Here's what I would consider a fair system of reparation to descendents of slaves:

First & foremost, reparation must include repatriation. Any African who doesn't want to be repatriated is admitting that they're better off in the US than they would have been had they been left in Africa. If having their ancestors brought here in slavery has made them better off than they would have been otherwise, then what claim do they have to reparation? Of course any repatriation would have to be permanent. Those being repatriated would have to give up their US citizenship.

Second, reparation dollar amounts must be based on the African enonomy not the US economy. If we have damaged some Africans by removing them from Africa, then obviously the amount of reparation we owe them would have to based on what they could be expected to earn in Africa not the US. If there income expectancy is higher in the US, then where is the economic damage? I have developed the following formula and taken wild guesses at the variables.

A 30 year old African decides he wants his reparation and he would like to be repatriated to Kenya. Ok, we find out the life expectancy in Kenya is 50 years. We also find out the average annual income in Kenya is $2,000. So we subtract his age from 50 and find out he has 20 years to live in Kenya. We multiple 20 times $2,000 and his reparation amount is $40,000. Plus we would give him free transportation to Kenya.

Since we have given him Kenya's average annual income for the rest of his life, he should be able to move to Kenya and live the rest of his life without ever having to work again. What more could a reasonable man ask?

It seems totally reasonable to me to base all of this on African life expectancies and African income levels because had we not enslaved their ancestors, then that is what they would have been born into. That is what they would have to look forward to. With the above two rules, I totally support reparation for Africans in America.




3 posted on 02/15/2004 6:36:06 AM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: William Terrell
First & foremost, reparation must include repatriation. Any African who doesn't want to be repatriated is admitting that they're better off in the US than they would have been had they been left in Africa.

An additional benefit to repatriation is that the repatriated could work to end slavery in the place where it still exists---Africa.

5 posted on 02/15/2004 6:39:17 AM PST by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: William Terrell
On the mark!
7 posted on 02/15/2004 6:40:14 AM PST by Northern Yankee ( Freedom needs a soldier...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: William Terrell
I agree entirely with your post but I think our govt. is entitled to deduct any monies this person or his family might have been given in any of the federal programs prior to his leaving the USA for good.
12 posted on 02/15/2004 6:45:07 AM PST by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: William Terrell
>First & foremost, reparation must include repatriation.

Brilliant!
13 posted on 02/15/2004 6:45:18 AM PST by applemac_g4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: William Terrell
Shouldn't people of Slavic descent get money too.. After all their nationality is the root word for Slave.
20 posted on 02/15/2004 7:02:06 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: William Terrell
Pretty good. As I mention above, first subtract the dollar amounts that AFRICAN nations owe to American blacks for their share. $40,000 divided by 50%= $20,000.
33 posted on 02/15/2004 7:33:25 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrack of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: William Terrell
Excellent, Bill!
I would also calculate the amount of money paid to Black Americans in the form a welfare and other Government programs since the end of slavery and subtract that from any reparation fund. Additionally, any white American who was denied employment to meet Affirmative Action quotas should have a right to reparations as well, also coming from the fund, and the black beneficiary of that program should have to repay any salary earned from the employment.
36 posted on 02/15/2004 7:39:10 AM PST by Ignatz (Helping people be more like me since 1960....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: William Terrell
This seems like a perfectly reasonable idea to me. I vote yea.
58 posted on 02/15/2004 8:38:45 AM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: William Terrell
A reparation plan I can go along with.
76 posted on 02/15/2004 9:38:43 AM PST by spodefly (February is Tagline History Month!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: William Terrell
awesome
82 posted on 02/15/2004 11:37:32 AM PST by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: William Terrell

Reparations?

Of course, but pay them in Confederate dollars.


99 posted on 09/15/2004 10:24:18 PM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson