Skip to comments.
Canada AmBushed by loose Conan
The Gazette ^
| February 14, 2004
| JOSH FREED
Posted on 02/14/2004 10:10:22 AM PST by Columbine
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
So now President Bush is responsible for Conan too.
Never mind that the fools paid to bring Conan to Canada! It's all the president's fault.
This so called writer included his email address with the article. I presume that means he wants comments!
1
posted on
02/14/2004 10:10:23 AM PST
by
Columbine
To: Columbine
Back when the Left was in full swoon for Howard Dean, they just loved Triumph the Insult Dog making a complete ass out of John Kerry on Leno. All of a sudden he just isn't so cool any more. Go figure.
2
posted on
02/14/2004 10:14:28 AM PST
by
CFC__VRWC
(AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
To: Columbine
The "funniest" thing about O'Brien's show is the federal and Ontario governments poured $1 million of our tax dollars into the visit. Now, THAT'S FUNNY! LOLOL!
But I wonder how he'd feel if we let Canada's Insulting Beaver Puppet loose on U.S. TV to yuk it up about Sept. 11.
Apples and oranges and really, really bad, stupid and hurtful analogy. It is one thing to make witty observations on people's behavior -- that is 90% of humor through the ages. It is another thing to suggest the unprovoked killing of 3,000 innocent people -- ANYWHERE -- could be the target of humor. To my knowledge, there is no analagous event in Canadian history. Also, many Canadians were killed on 9/11. These Canuks really take themselves seriously if this is the analogy they with to propose.
3
posted on
02/14/2004 10:16:41 AM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Everyone is stupid! That is why they do all those stupid things! -- H. Simpson.)
To: Columbine
You gotta love Canada. While so many nations in the world practice deception, Canadians don't even try to hide their stupidity.
4
posted on
02/14/2004 10:17:58 AM PST
by
counterpunch
(click my name to check out my 'toons!)
To: Columbine
I saw clips of thise piece and it was hilarious. Then again, I'm not Canadian and therefore humor-free.
5
posted on
02/14/2004 10:18:43 AM PST
by
Catspaw
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: Columbine
All I ever see are the same two jokes quoted from that show. Are they all copying from one another? Where is the funny stuff?
7
posted on
02/14/2004 10:20:33 AM PST
by
VadeRetro
To: freedumb2003
Well, maybe eating yellow snow really is a deep and serious wound for Canadians.
Remember the Yellow Snow Epidemic of '97?
Thousands were lost.
8
posted on
02/14/2004 10:22:06 AM PST
by
counterpunch
(click my name to check out my 'toons!)
To: Columbine
'But I wonder how he'd feel if we let Canada's Insulting Beaver Puppet loose on U.S. TV to yuk it up about Sept. 11'
Jeez, Canadians must lack a sense of perspective. That's like me joking abut someone's bad haircut and they respond with a joke about my mother being a whore.
9
posted on
02/14/2004 10:22:33 AM PST
by
Bogey78O
(Why are we even having this debate?)
To: Columbine
My sympathies to the Canadians who had to shell out one million for Conan's visit. Let advertizing cover all his costs.
10
posted on
02/14/2004 10:23:58 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
To: Columbine
For the last two years we Canadians have become more and more distant from a U.S. run by George W. Bush. We've proposed legalizing pot laws and gay marriage. We've refused to fight in Iraq. We've become so anti-Bush a poll in last week's Maclean's magazine found only 15 per cent of Canadians would vote for him as a leader. Hear that Conservatives? They are doing polls in other countries to discuss business that isn't even theirs. If it hasn't been declared already, this is going to be a war between us and the world. The enemy already has a huge foothold in this country. It is called the Democrat Party.
To: Columbine
Let me get this straight.
- Canadian taxpayers shelled out C$1mil, which is probably almost half a million, to import an American talk show host, who is (to be charitable) not the most popular in America.
- A key ingredient in his unpopularity is his persona. Maybe he's charming in person, I don't know, but on TV he comes across as: a jerk.
- Imported to Canada at Canadian behest, paid in money earned by regular Canadians, the jerk -- Lo! and behold -- acted like: a jerk.
- His "insult dog" alter ego acted like an even bigger jerk. This is predictable even to me, who like most sensible people on either side of fifty-four forty hasn't seen a cumulative five minutes of this show.
- So, now Canadians are upset, and of course, like everything Canada screws up, from their quintessentially French defence policy ("Ten-SHUN. Dress right, DRESS! Hands UP!") to their great health care system ("Sorry, you're too old for a heart transplant. Best bet is to try to establish US residency..."), it's all the fault of Uncle Sam.
Cry me a river.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
To: freedumb2003
Apples and oranges and really, really bad, stupid and hurtful analogy. Exactly. That'd be like joking about an intentionally-set Halifax Explosion.
13
posted on
02/14/2004 10:32:59 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(Chat is my milieu)
To: Criminal Number 18F
Well, actually, according to the writer, it's all Bush's fault.
To: Columbine
54/40 or fight!
15
posted on
02/14/2004 10:36:41 AM PST
by
SevenDaysInMay
(Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
To: VadeRetro
All I ever see are the same two jokes quoted from that show. Are they all copying from one another? Where is the funny stuff? The funny stuff is that these nutty people used tax dollars to pay for being insulted.
That cracks me up!
16
posted on
02/14/2004 10:39:58 AM PST
by
Columbine
(Bush '04 - Owens '08)
To: Columbine
Not CIA...grass-roots !
ANNEX CANADIA !
17
posted on
02/14/2004 10:40:22 AM PST
by
PoorMuttly
("The cheaper the hood, the more colorful the language." - Humphrey Bogart (The Maltese Falcon)
To: martin_fierro
Wow! Thanks for the link and the history. Reading about that tragedy (and that is the correct word in this context) my first reaction was one of deep sorrow. The compounding of the delay between collision and explosion that brought all those eyes to be in range was particularly heart-wrenching.
And like you point out, that was an ACCIDENT!
The idea that someone would even consider using a tragedy like that (which is what this author is doing) to make ploitical and journalistic hay is sick.
18
posted on
02/14/2004 10:42:22 AM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Everyone is stupid! That is why they do all those stupid things! -- H. Simpson.)
To: freedumb2003
The idea that someone would even consider using a tragedy like that (which is what this author is doing) to make ploitical and journalistic hay is sick. On the other hand, having the French embedded in Canada may be a comparable tragedy up there.
19
posted on
02/14/2004 10:50:24 AM PST
by
per loin
To: per loin
On the other hand, having the French embedded in Canada may be a comparable tragedy up there. LOL! I shudder to even think of it. Another beautiful irony is that the French DESPISE the French-Canuks (or at least so I have been told by my Canadian friends).
20
posted on
02/14/2004 10:53:51 AM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Everyone is stupid! That is why they do all those stupid things! -- H. Simpson.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson