Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats not swayed by Bush documents
AP | 2/14/04 | JENNIFER LOVEN

Posted on 02/13/2004 11:50:41 PM PST by kattracks

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hundreds of pages of documents that the White House said comprise President Bush's entire military record offer no new answers to the election-year questions that have swirled around his Vietnam-era service.

Democrats who have led the criticism greeted Friday's release of documents with skepticism.

"Each revelation of material from the Bush White House has raised more questions than it has answered," said Democratic National Committee spokeswoman Debra DeShong. "It remains to be seen if these newest documents will provide any answers."

The White House distributed the two-inch stack of papers, and allowed reporters a brief look through another several dozen pages of medical records that were not allowed out of a briefing room, in yet another effort to quiet a political storm that has showed no sign of abating.

Bush was in the Texas Air National Guard from 1968 to 1973, much of the time as a pilot, but never went to Vietnam or flew in combat.

His military record has been an issue in his campaigns as far back as 1994. It was revived this year by Democrats who see an opportunity to puncture Bush's popularity on national security issues and whose front-runner to challenge the president for re-election is decorated Vietnam War veteran John Kerry.

The criticism, which Kerry himself has stayed relatively clear of while not quieting others in his party, centers around the year between roughly May 1972 and May 1973 for which there are few records.

Bush had asked to be able to transfer temporarily from the Texas Guard to an Alabama base during that time so he could work on the Senate campaign of a family friend. Reports differ on how long he was actually in Alabama, but it's generally believed that he returned to his Texas unit after the November 1972 election.

Democrats questioning whether Bush ever showed up for duty in Alabama have called on him to publicize his entire file to put the matter to rest. Though the president promised to do so in an interview last Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," the White House appeared reluctant until the mass document release late Friday.

"Our understanding is that this is the entire file," presidential press secretary Scott McClellan said. "The record documents that the accusations by some are false."

Many pages in the pile of military records were duplicates, as they came from different repositories.

They show Bush getting a glowing recommendation for promotion to 1st lieutenant — which he received on Nov. 7, 1970 — and exemplary performance evaluations from his commanders at Ellington Air Force Base in Houston.

"Lieutenant Bush is an outstanding young pilot and officer and is a credit to this unit," Lt. Col. Bobby Hodges wrote on May 27, 1971. "This officer is rated in the upper 10 percent of his contemporaries."

The documents also show no sign that Bush received special treatment either to get into the Guard when there were long waiting lists at the height of the Vietnam War or to be discharged from it nearly eight months before his six-year service obligation was completed in order to attend Harvard Business School; that he was subject to any disciplinary action while in the military; or that damaging details were hidden in his medical record.

All were questions some Democrats had said needed to be answered.

But the records provided no evidence Bush served in Alabama.

Bush requested the transfer on Sept. 5, 1972. It was granted on Sept. 11 and he was told to report for duty to the 187th TAC Recon Group at Dannelly Air National Guard Base in Montgomery, Ala.

One of the few other mentions of Alabama in the documents was in an Ellington performance evaluation, covering the period from May 1, 1972 to April 30, 1973, that could not rate Bush because he was absent from the base.

"A civilian occupation made it necessary for him to move to Montgomery, Ala.," wrote Lt. Col. William D. Harris Jr. "He cleared this base on 15 May 1972 and has been performing equivalent training in a non-flying status with the 187 Tac Recon Gp. Dannelly ANG Base, Alabama."

Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, the Texas Air National Guard commander at the time, wrote at the bottom that he concurred "with the comments of the reporting official."

But there was no documentation from the Alabama side. Several members of the Alabama unit that Bush was assigned to have told The Associated Press that they couldn't recall ever seeing him, while one retired Alabama Guard officer said he remembers Bush showing up for duty.

Earlier this week, the White House for the first time released payroll records it said proved Bush served in Alabama.

Those records, which were not included in the documents released Friday, showed Bush was paid for 25 days of service during the one-year period in question — most of them in 1973. He was not paid for any service during a more than five-month period in 1972, from April 17 to Oct. 27.

He was paid for two days in late October of that year, four days in mid-November and no days in December. They do not say what Bush did to receive pay or where he did it.

In what aides said was further proof, the White House also has distributed a copy of a dental exam Bush received at the Alabama base on Jan. 6, 1973.

The documents released Friday also showed that Bush lost his status as a Guard pilot because of his failure to have the required annual medical exam. White House communications director Dan Bartlett said Bush went on non-flying status because of his move to Alabama and thus had "no need or reason" to take the physical.



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: awol; bush; jerrykillian; militaryrecord; nationalguard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2004 11:50:41 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Yep. Just as I had predicted, the snowfall of proof didn't sway the Democrats. It only "raised more questions".
2 posted on 02/13/2004 11:53:04 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (The South isn't Bush's backyard; The South is Bush's front yard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Republicans not Swayed by Kerry Denial of Second Affair.
3 posted on 02/13/2004 11:53:06 PM PST by Ingtar (Understanding is a three-edged sword : your side, my side, and the truth in between ." -- Kosh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The truth never stopped them before.
4 posted on 02/13/2004 11:53:44 PM PST by kuma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Is this a surprise? There could be videotape of every second of his service with a certificate of autheticity from LBJ, Jimmy CArter, and John F. Kennedy resurected from the deat AND the democrats would still nitpick. I challenge any normal person to recreate their lives from 30 years ago.
5 posted on 02/13/2004 11:55:58 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Ok, so what, anyone have proof of the citation posted on the JFKERRY website.

"For Kerry's bravery, Rassmann recommended that he be recognized, and Kerry was awarded the Bronze Star with Combat V."

citation reads "The man was receiving sniper fire from both banks. Lt Kerry directed his gunners to provide supressing fire, while from an exposed position on the bow, his arm bleeding and in pain with disregard for his personal safety he pulled the man aboard."

Is this in his military records? We need proof!

After seeing General Clark praising JFKerry today after outing him earlier in the week, nothing out of JFKerry can be believe anymore with out proof.

JFKerry show us your military records.
6 posted on 02/14/2004 12:00:58 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Let them nitpick...they're digging themselves a bigger hole by doing so.
7 posted on 02/14/2004 12:04:21 AM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
I'm totally sick of the dims and their petty presstitutes. In fact, their are all becoming very shameful, again. This story is the header on the Excite home page. Disgusting.
8 posted on 02/14/2004 12:05:36 AM PST by raisincane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What else is new?

If Republicans had any sense they would decry this as a "politically motivated witch hunt."

That's what liberals would do. Republicans never quite seem to understand that bloated language gets you lots of political mileage.

9 posted on 02/14/2004 12:09:06 AM PST by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Which senator claimed to have been awarded a medal they were ultimatly shown not to have it been awarded? Was that kerry. It is a vaugue late night recall.
10 posted on 02/14/2004 12:09:25 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The American people don't care about this. It was 35 years ago. It's boring. They don't care about Kerry and Nam , either. It too was 35 years ago.

People care about today. Dinosaur history is irrelevant.
The liberals press cares, but no one is watching. They'll figure it out.
Actually, Bush is getting sympathy. People are starting to feel sorry fir him because they like the guy personally. Reporting when he had hemorrhoids is just going too far. Bush will come out on top of this issue, and he won't have to do anything.

11 posted on 02/14/2004 12:12:16 AM PST by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Time for the 'Rats to pull their dirty tricks elsewhere - they've been soundly thumped regarding GWB's NG duty with the release of these records.
12 posted on 02/14/2004 12:14:23 AM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Not sure, but the other Kerry (sp) from Nebraska who lost a leg, and thought about running for President.

I am not sure but that is what comes to mind.
13 posted on 02/14/2004 12:15:37 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
His silver star story just doesn't work. What he described would NOT get him a silver star.
I'll bet he found them on the field after a protest like the rumors say, and that's why he won't release his records. He'll NEVER do it. He'll be sooooo busted!!!

Bush is proud of his service to this country. He released all he had. He has nothing to hide.
Bush is an honest man.

14 posted on 02/14/2004 12:17:32 AM PST by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
They don't care about Kerry and Nam , either. It too was 35 years ago.

They should care about what he did after Viet Nam.....

15 posted on 02/14/2004 12:20:16 AM PST by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Democrats questioning whether Bush ever showed up for duty in Alabama have called on him to publicize his entire file to put the matter to rest. Though the president promised to do so in an interview last Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," the White House appeared reluctant until the mass document release late Friday.

The key word here would be "APPEAR"

And who says this .. the liberal press and DNC hacks

They asked for proof of pay ... Bush gave it to them

They asked for medical records .. Bush gave it to them

Then they pranced out Burkett, who if you do a google turns out to a far left whack job ... so Bush releases ALL of the documents to prove there is no conspiracy as is being claimed

And what do these nit wit liberals do .. the keep digging themselves a hole where they look like pathetic losers

16 posted on 02/14/2004 12:24:53 AM PST by Mo1 (" Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Bushtastic
Welcome to Free Republic
18 posted on 02/14/2004 12:34:07 AM PST by Mo1 (" Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bushtastic
Troll cleanup in aisle three.
19 posted on 02/14/2004 12:36:04 AM PST by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
THE REASON THE DEMS ARE NOT SWAYED BY THE DOCUMENTS IS OBVIOUS .. THEY'RE JUST TOO STOOOOOOPID TO READ THEM.
20 posted on 02/14/2004 12:41:06 AM PST by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson