Skip to comments.
Dems fret over Kerry's 'Clintonian' response
WorldNet Daily ^
| Feb 13 2004
Posted on 02/13/2004 6:38:53 PM PST by new cruelty
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: new cruelty
Maybe, unlike Clinton, Kerry could honestly say "I've had no sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky."
2
posted on
02/13/2004 6:44:05 PM PST
by
NCPAC
To: new cruelty
Predication. Hillary will let him twist in the wind for months on this. Why clean Kerry's clock now and go into the convention the defacto winner months ahead of time? Kind of like have a 20 point lead with 5 minutes to play.
No, its the big MO Hillary is after. Come into the convention with feear uncertainty and doubt; right up to the last minute. And head out the convention door with the crown on her head with a full head of steam.
3
posted on
02/13/2004 6:44:22 PM PST
by
Swanks
To: new cruelty
I have been saying this since I heard Kerry's response. It is a non-denial denial. What crappy reporters, failing to pin him down. Or should I say what Leftist enablers?
4
posted on
02/13/2004 6:44:26 PM PST
by
PackerBoy
(Just my opinion ....)
To: new cruelty
LOL, but Kerry said he has said his last word on the subject, period. LOL! Guess either his have to keep sweating, or "our hero" will have to go back on that little vow.
To: new cruelty
Just watched Mr. Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks, on the Dennis Miller program . If he's not the epitome of fountain spouting liberal politics, I haven't seen one. Talk about being "Johnny on the Spot" for being right on topic.
Talk about being boycott waiting to happen.
6
posted on
02/13/2004 6:47:18 PM PST
by
olde north church
(There come's a time when the only choice is to fight fire with stupidity!)
To: PackerBoy
Under the standard that the media holds Bush, Kerry must prove his whereabouts every day during the time he is alleged to have the affair. He must prove that he never spent any time alone with the woman. He must produce all of his medical and personal records so we can verify that he isn't lying. Its not enough to deny the allegations.
7
posted on
02/13/2004 6:48:11 PM PST
by
07055
To: new cruelty
"I know that you know what you think you know is known to be in the know, but what you know has no known connection to the situation as many now know, which is nothing I know about."
8
posted on
02/13/2004 6:48:51 PM PST
by
whereasandsoforth
(tagged for migratory purposes only)
To: KellyAdmirer
There is a name out there. Where is the body?
9
posted on
02/13/2004 6:48:54 PM PST
by
Thebaddog
(Woof this!)
To: new cruelty
Ketchup boy is just trying out the other condiments.
To: new cruelty
Why should this upset the RATS, the press is giving Kerry a pass, looks like Kerry can say and do anything he wants.
11
posted on
02/13/2004 6:51:15 PM PST
by
mystery-ak
(*terrorism has been exaggerated*....Kerry....We must defeat him, our lives depend on it.)
To: new cruelty
Here is the correct response if you are innocent:
"This type of unfounded character assassination has more than just me as a victim. I have a wife and a family who are effected by these lies. The seeds of distrust are sown among the many hard working people who have devoted a lot of their time to my winning the nomination.
If it was just me hurt personally I would brush it off. But my friends and family have to face other people who will now have doubts in their minds because of these rotten lies. The other person named is also smeared in this lie.
I have not had an extramarital affair of any kind.
Produce the so called people involved instead of making these scurrilous charges.
That bum Drudge, who smeared Sidney Blumenthal with the false wife beating charge just hasn't learned his lesson
My wife, my children, my friends, my co-workers, and the American people deserve better than this total fabrication".....
12
posted on
02/13/2004 6:51:17 PM PST
by
Capt. Tom
(Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb republicans. - Capt. Tom)
To: Swanks
I keep hearing this stuff about Hillary, but she would get her clock cleaned by Bush.
As the article says, memories aren't that short, and Hillary would galvanize the Republican party like no other opponent.
Don't forget: she has no money, and could not raise enough to mount a decent campaign two months out.
Hillary is not running in 2004; she's running in 2008, and it is in her interest to wound any Democrat candidate.
13
posted on
02/13/2004 6:52:01 PM PST
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: PackerBoy
Were this a Republican, the media frenzy would be underway demanding answers.
14
posted on
02/13/2004 6:52:31 PM PST
by
mwl1
To: PackerBoy
What crappy reporters, failing to pin him down. Or should I say what Leftist enablers?It was a Don Imus interview wasn't it?
I've eaten lettuce that had more smarts than Don Imus.
15
posted on
02/13/2004 6:53:24 PM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: 07055
"Under the standard that the media holds Bush, Kerry must prove his whereabouts every day..."
Yeah, but that would be true only if the media were unbiased. Note that none of the major news sources have said anything about this scandal or about Kerry's actions after Vietnam or anything else that might have the potential to damage him. It's not fair at all, but it's the way that the news media works, unfortunately.
16
posted on
02/13/2004 6:54:02 PM PST
by
Eisenhower
("A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel." - Robert Frost)
To: 07055
On Target!
17
posted on
02/13/2004 6:56:02 PM PST
by
Jank
To: 07055
It is kind of funny to me that most Democrats dont have a clue as to how to handle the information age revolution.
Knowledge is power.
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.
The more we know...
Hoisted by their own petards!
18
posted on
02/13/2004 6:57:22 PM PST
by
sarasmom
(Every day of my life forces me to add to the number of people who can kiss my @ss.)
To: Swanks
I had put the Clinton idea to bed, but there is a lot of chaos in the party.
As soon as the Dem crown is about to be placed, there's a catastrophe, twice now.
Could it happen also to Edwards?
My hope is that this is a Clintonian machination, which the rad-dems reject as Shrillary tries to make her move.
It's like chess pieces being removed from the board....Dean the straightahead rook, and Kerry the angular bishop. Does the Queen have maximum freedom and power, or will she get removed herself, leaving the board empty?
To: dead
That's not saying much.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson