Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Killed Jesus?: Setting the Record Straight
BreakPoint ^ | 12 Feb 04 | Charles Colson

Posted on 02/13/2004 11:51:10 AM PST by Mr. Silverback

The cover of the latest NEWSWEEK magazine asks the right question: "Who killed Jesus?" This has been a raging debate for a year, since Mel Gibson started his remarkable film project THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST. He immediately ran into a buzz saw of opposition from the liberal media and Jewish groups who were afraid the film would rekindle anti-Semitism.

Now, Jews have a legitimate concern about this. During the Middle Ages, Christians treated Jews terribly. In Russia there were pogroms against the Jews. And of course some of the maniacs around Hitler professed that they were killing Jews to purify the Christian race.

But is this sensitivity today well-founded? If we would look at history alone, we would have to say that Pontius Pilate certainly was guilty. Legend has it that years after the crucifixion he was frantically washing his hands trying to cleanse himself from the blood of Christ. And, of course, Caiphus the High Priest certainly bears his share of responsibility. So do the crowds who yelled, "Crucify him." So was it the Romans or the Jews, the venality of Pontius Pilate or the passion of the mob?

It was both and neither. The Jews didn't cause the death of Jesus, nor did the Romans. They were merely instruments carrying out what God had decreed. He sent His only begotten Son to die on the cross so that the sins of mankind might be forgiven. And those who take Scripture seriously have always known who killed Jesus: You and I and all other sinful human beings did so.

Mel Gibson understands this. In his movie, THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST, the hand holding the spike being nailed through Christ's wrist is Gibson's. Who killed Jesus? Mel Gibson knows. And he made the very point with his own hand that he was responsible, not the Jews.

Similarly the Dutch painter, Rembrandt painted THE RAISING OF THE CROSS as a self-portrait. As Christ hangs on the cross while it is being lifted into place, the soldier pulling it up is Rembrandt. Who killed Jesus? Rembrandt knew. He did. And I did. And you did. We're the ones who sent Jesus to the cross loaded down with our sins.

So enough of this foolish controversy. My advice to Christians is that you make it abundantly clear to your friends and neighbors that we are the ones responsible and then take them to see the film. Let them experience the passion and explain to them why it was necessary for Jesus to go to the cross. And be ready with a biblical answer for your Jewish friends who hear all of this propaganda, most of it stirred up by professional activists.

Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, says that it is not who is to blame that really has everybody up in arms. The media elite know that if people see this film, the right answer to the haunting question "Who Killed Jesus?" will be clear. What strikes terror into the hearts of the media elite is that people might once again be convicted of sin, repent, and come to faith in Christ.

So, three cheers for Mel Gibson. And thanks to NEWSWEEK for asking the right question, even if it does not have the right answer. But now it is up to us Christians to do our job to educate our neighbors and flood the movie theaters.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: charlescolson; crucifixion; thepassion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-202 last
To: jwh_Denver
Who said I wanted to have a war just because I am reminding Gentiles that when they point a finger at the Jews, they should be pointing two fingers back at themselves/ourselves. Either one is a Jew or a Gentile and the Gentiles living today are descended from the pagan Gentiles living at that time, just as the Jews are descended from the Jews living at that time, notwithstanding people who convert somewhere along the line. We need to repent for 2000 years of boasting against the branches.
201 posted on 03/17/2004 9:22:27 AM PST by Prodigal Daughter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Daughter
We need to repent for 2000 years of boasting against the branches.

If this was the point of your last post to me I'm sorry I missed it. In my post #102 I had absolutely no intentions of giving the "right" to Gentiles to point a finger at the Jews. I never even thought of it and this is first I've heard of it. Why should I repent for the Gentiles for the last 2000 years when I had nothing to do with their actions? I can repent for mine but I don't ever remember getting on the Jews case for killing Jesus Christ, but maybe I have. I can repent for myself.

I do not war or argrue over Scriptures. I will peacefully debate them but once it's shown to me a person does not believe the Scriptures (which I admit may not be the correct ones) I show I bow out. They have the God given right to believe what they want and I respect that. I am not referring to you here in the sense or warring or argruing Scriptures.
202 posted on 03/17/2004 1:45:33 PM PST by jwh_Denver (Excuse me for awhile, my tagline is having a tantrum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-202 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson