Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drlevy88
There "could be," but there is no first principle dictating that there must.

I've used the phrase "could be" in purely theoretical terms. The reality is that the world operates under any number of economic "imbalanced conditions" nearly 100% of the time. In fact, the day you think everything is "balanced" is a good time to be concerned -- because in economic terms, "balanced" and "stagnation" are pretty much synonymous.

As for 100% efficiency in growing lettuce, bullhockey.

I used the "100% efficiency" condition to help illustrate how the process would work if we were trading commodities or finished products that weren't as easy to produce (in terms of the labor requirements) as a head of lettuce.

If you were producing commercial bakery ovens and I were producing farm tractors, then doubling your output wouldn't be so easy.

Consider the question again, and for the sake of the argument assume that two heads of lettuce per week is your current capacity. How would you address the problem?

186 posted on 02/13/2004 10:58:37 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
As you allude, an imbalance should be an opportunity to grow. But if a government (e.g. Chicommunism) halts the growth, then we mostly cause more misery by feeding to the imbalance.
187 posted on 02/13/2004 11:03:17 PM PST by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
How would you address the problem?

Better technology for all

189 posted on 02/13/2004 11:04:26 PM PST by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson