Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
Nowadays the anti pollution mavens would not have stood for such a dumping but would have insisted on recycling. That would have actually helped the autoworkers because it would have meant cheaper steel.
184 posted on 02/13/2004 10:53:06 PM PST by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]


To: drlevy88
That would have actually helped the autoworkers because it would have meant cheaper steel.

Bingo! Go to the head of the class, sir -- you've just identified a tangible "imbalance" along the lines of what I was describing. The auto workers are "helped" because they are able to take advantage of a situation (albeit temporary) in which they can produce cars using recycled steel -- while the workers in the iron and coal mines who would have been producing the steel must suffer on the unemployment line for a period of time because their commodities are not needed.

At the risk of sounding sarcastic, I'll point out that in this case, it is obviously imperative for the U.S. government to dump the vehicles overboad rather than recycle them -- because we must maintain full employment in our economy no matter how inefficient it may be.

190 posted on 02/13/2004 11:04:32 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson