Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alleged Kerry Affair with Intern Draws Media Attention
Talon News ^ | February 13, 2004 | Jimmy Moore

Posted on 02/13/2004 5:53:30 AM PST by new cruelty

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: new cruelty
What You Don't Know about John Kerry

Now it appears there is even more we don't know about John Kerry!!

81 posted on 02/13/2004 9:42:59 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Rush this morning, termed a married Democratic nominee for president having an affair with an intern as a "resume enhancer." Well said.
82 posted on 02/13/2004 11:03:47 AM PST by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Ryan Bailey; labard1; Always Right; over3Owithabrain; byteback; quesera; InterceptPoint; ...
I've not seen such a partisan media in my lifetime, its irresponsible and sickening.

Yes, the media is more liberal than ever, given the HATE they have for G.W., and their desire for a one world government, U.N. as major honcho.

The media is currently giving the biggest pass ever to Kerry, Drudge didn't leak the story General Clark did, this is a democrat infight.

Yes!

There is no excuse for the US Media's sitting on this story while running the AWOL allegations against Pres. Bush.

No, and yes! There is a reason for the lamestream media to be closed-mouthed about this Kerry intern story. Nothing is verified yet! Right?

But, the disgusting hits on G.W. about the "AWOL" crap is totally all Liberal horses**t!

I have said forever that the mainstream media is the most influential, evil, destructive institution in the country today. I have been stopped by my own desire to my impression of today's mainstream media by the realization that I'd be suspended or banned from here by suggesting my characterization of the matter.

I love FR so much that I do not want to be sent away. FR is the best website in the country, no site is even in second place, IMO.

But, the mainstream/liberal/sycophantic/Democrat/mainstream media today in America is basically a group of a few very powerful liberal folks who have controlled the media for over sixty years.

The problem for me is, that when I SUGGEST who these owners of the media are, the producers of the media product, and the directors of the media's direction, I get in real trouble.

Just let me say that .......... if you look back to the short list of fellows who were permitted to buy up and own the three major television networks back at their inception, you will see a common thread, and today a similar group of people are deconstructing this country, on purpose - deconstructing this country with their control of the influence of American voters' opinion.

IMO, it is time, before this very important election 2004, to have the American voters realize who owns, operates, and directs the direction of the reporting of all political events in this country.

We are at a point in America where most citizens, thanks to the media, think that cuts in tax rates bring LESS renenue into the government...........and that is totally wrong. At this point, the mainstream media takes every opportunity to suggest that all our efforts in Iraq constitute a "quagmire". And on and on.

At this point in America, the mainstream media has taken it upon themselves to completely ignore the effect of the Supreme Courts decision on CFR.

The mainstream media has nothing to do but ignore what 'The Founding Fathers' meant as the intent of "The Press".......... a watchdog on government, an institution to keep the citizens up on the truth.

Well, I'm tired of it, and it's time for all of us to try to figure out how to get things right before a Democrat is elected this time around.

Sorry for all the meandering, I just care alot about this.

It is time to expose the mainstream media, because, along with the liberal courts and the public schools, they are the most evil institutions in the country.

It is a VERY partisan media, and that fact has to be somehow exposed to the majority of voters before November or there will be a Democrat in the White House......... maybe The Beast.

Sorry ........... I don't write real well, I just care.

83 posted on 02/13/2004 12:14:43 PM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: thesummerwind
Gee, get a grip.

Here's a FR thread from before your time that gives the simple facts behind the liberal control of the media:
American Journalism and the Constitution (Tony Snow)

84 posted on 02/13/2004 12:28:38 PM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: thesummerwind
Sorry ........... I don't write real well, I just care.

You have not a thing to be sorry about.!

If the R's keep their powder dry, on this issue, the media by default will further expose themselves for what they are. The term journalist is now becoming a misnomer. There are few true journalists in the media. Most who consider themselves journalists are just using their job as an arm of the DNC, thus they are nothing but political hacks. Alas, it has been this way, and will remain this way, until the people who buy their product, wake up and smell the coffee.!!

85 posted on 02/13/2004 12:39:47 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: thesummerwind
I agree that the mainstream media is quite hostile to us. Being someone who has been very politically interested for almost 50 years, I can only say that we have better ways to get out our message and respond to the mainstream media than ever before.

There were few conservative or libertarian voices heard nationally when William Buckley founded the National Review. So as bad as current media stories are today, it's a lot better than it used to be-- with one major exception. In those earlier years both parties at least claimed to be strong on defense and in favor of a strong bipartisan foreign policy. No mainstream press in those (pre-Vietnam days) would ever have questioned the good faith or factual assertions of the US government, much less have relentlessly cheered for the enemy when the US was at war.
86 posted on 02/13/2004 1:12:09 PM PST by labard1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
What media attention?
87 posted on 02/13/2004 1:16:17 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: labard1
it's a lot better than it used to be-- with one major exception

Disagree ......... the exception is today........... the people, the voting public is less informed, more somnambulant than four or five decades ago.

I'm 57, so we're somewhat the same age.

But we have more of a problem today, IMO, even with FoxNews and conservative talk radio, because ......... the people are so involved with paying their taxes and have been taught that after that, all they should care about is self-gratification, a pizza, and a rented movie. You know the average voting American is relatively clueless on political details, and nearly totally influenced by the media they see.

For verification, check out "Jay Walking" on Leno!

88 posted on 02/13/2004 1:21:21 PM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
Most who consider themselves journalists are just using their job as an arm of the DNC, thus they are nothing but political hacks.

Yes, you are so right. But my question is to you .................. when will a majority of the voting Americans understand what you just said? Before November?

I doubt it, but I pray something "Godly" happens to enlighten the country, the best founded country in the world.

But, there is trouble ahead. The ruthless, unending Democrat hatred, voter fraud, and their media enablers could possibly ruin this country this fall.

89 posted on 02/13/2004 1:29:41 PM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
Gee, get a grip.

I read sweet Tony's words. Thanks.

Now, what's your point? Do you have a grip, smitty?

100 words or less would be good!

90 posted on 02/13/2004 1:34:42 PM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
a FR thread from before your time

What's that mean, genius?

"before your time"...............

91 posted on 02/13/2004 1:37:47 PM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: thesummerwind
If you want to argue that our public schools are a disgrace and much worse today than they were 50 or 100 years ago, you'll get no argument from me. If you want to also observe that college faculties (other than engineering, science, and math) are more leftist and more intent on indoctrinating our children rather than educating them, I'll agree.

But we can't blame all that on what we usually call "the media." The schools are more responsible than the media for the "Jay Walking" show.
92 posted on 02/13/2004 1:45:15 PM PST by labard1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
From Snow;"Talk radio, the Internet and cable television have shattered the "mainstream" media's grip on the distribution of facts and ideas.

Now, you get a grip! At least as much as twenty five times as many citizens watch NBC, ABC, SeeBS, and CNN versus FoxNews every night of the week. Get your grip.

You're dreaming, smitty.

shattered the "mainstream" media's grip on the distribution of facts and ideas ............. all respect due, you're dreaming!

93 posted on 02/13/2004 1:46:15 PM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: labard1
O.K., you're right. ;)
94 posted on 02/13/2004 1:48:15 PM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: thesummerwind
Whatever. Feel free not to 'ping' me.
95 posted on 02/13/2004 1:49:48 PM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
Great point you made, smitty. Thanks for the intelligent answer.
96 posted on 02/13/2004 1:51:29 PM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Sender
Whoa, I never thought of that! I'm sure that if a small fry shows up, he will come before the cameras to announce how proud he is that daddy is a Vietnam Vet.

Of course, I'm assuming you've heard that rumor...kerry was in Vietnam...;^)

97 posted on 02/13/2004 1:52:22 PM PST by small voice in the wilderness (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sender
Malvern, Pennsylvania

OMG, this is minutes from my home!

98 posted on 02/13/2004 1:55:17 PM PST by pettifogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: thesummerwind
When you start with Rush Limbaugh, add other talk radio, Fox news, plus blogs and sites that try to emulate Free Republic, you have lots of sources of news for people who are motivated to get information not covered honestly by the mainstream press. Yes, it would be nice to have more of a mainstream network presence today (even though its market share is steadily shrinking).

My recollection of old behavioral studies on political opinion formation showed that "opinion leaders" tended to have a much bigger impact on political decision making than any other factor. The information is readily available for people motivated to find it (which is a defining factor to be "opinion leaders"). Those folks have a much better chance to get good information today than they did in years past. Folks who watch Fox News are MUCH more influential than folks who watch Brokaw, just like readers of the Wall Street Journal are MUCH more influential than readers of USA Today, notwithstanding the lower audience/readership of the more influential sources.
99 posted on 02/13/2004 2:06:21 PM PST by labard1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: labard1
you have lots of sources of news for people who are motivated to get information not covered honestly by the mainstream press

I hear you, but unfortunately for Bush and Republicans there just are NOT NEARLY ENOUGH "people who are motivated to get information". And not much will change before November.

The mainstream media will most likely win this election.

100 posted on 02/14/2004 12:24:33 AM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson